Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Melanoma of the Skin, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Michigan 5,10 18.8 # (18.5, 19.2) 2,053 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.7 (-8.5, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 19.9 (19.8, 20.0) 65,719 § 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Emmet County 6,10 46.0 # (36.8, 56.8) 19 2008-2012 falling falling trend -22.3 (-38.6, -1.6)
Grand Traverse County 6,10 35.3 # (30.1, 41.1) 35 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.3 (-33.8, 44.1)
Charlevoix County 6,10 34.4 # (25.5, 45.5) 11 2008-2012 * *
Otsego County 6,10 31.1 # (22.1, 42.5) 9 2008-2012 * *
Leelanau County 6,10 30.5 # (21.6, 42.2) 10 2008-2012 * *
Gladwin County 6,10 29.2 # (21.2, 39.4) 11 2008-2012 * *
Kalkaska County 6,10 26.6 # (16.9, 39.8) 5 2008-2012 * *
Montmorency County 6,10 26.0 # (15.9, 42.4) 4 2008-2012 * *
Livingston County 6,10 26.0 # (22.7, 29.5) 51 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.4 (-18.9, 12.6)
Benzie County 6,10 25.9 # (17.4, 37.8) 7 2008-2012 * *
Alpena County 6,10 25.9 # (18.7, 35.1) 10 2008-2012 * *
Ottawa County 6,10 25.3 # (22.6, 28.2) 66 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (-14.2, 16.7)
Kent County 6,10 24.8 # (23.0, 26.7) 146 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-26.3, 34.4)
Washtenaw County 6,10 24.3 # (21.9, 26.9) 79 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.7 (-27.1, 16.8)
Lapeer County 6,10 24.2 # (19.9, 29.2) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.9 (-29.9, 29.0)
Shiawassee County 6,10 23.7 # (19.0, 29.2) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.3 (-27.9, 27.1)
Allegan County 6,10 22.8 # (19.0, 27.0) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend -14.7 (-30.7, 4.9)
St. Clair County 6,10 22.7 # (19.6, 26.1) 42 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.0 (-11.3, 15.0)
Jackson County 6,10 22.5 # (19.5, 25.9) 41 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.7 (-14.4, 1.7)
Huron County 6,10 21.7 # (15.5, 29.6) 10 2008-2012 * *
Tuscola County 6,10 21.4 # (16.6, 27.3) 14 2008-2012 * *
Cheboygan County 6,10 21.3 # (14.4, 30.5) 7 2008-2012 * *
Oakland County 7,8 21.3 (20.1, 22.4) 285 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Berrien County 6,10 21.2 # (18.3, 24.6) 39 2008-2012 stable stable trend -13.3 (-33.1, 12.3)
Midland County 6,10 21.2 # (17.2, 25.9) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-25.9, 31.9)
Osceola County 6,10 20.9 # (13.8, 30.6) 6 2008-2012 * *
Manistee County 6,10 20.9 # (14.4, 29.8) 7 2008-2012 * *
Lenawee County 6,10 20.5 # (16.9, 24.8) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-17.8, 18.7)
Ingham County 6,10 20.4 # (18.0, 23.0) 55 2008-2012 stable stable trend -12.1 (-38.7, 26.1)
Eaton County 6,10 20.0 # (16.5, 24.1) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.6 (-25.8, 41.8)
Mecosta County 6,10 19.9 # (14.5, 26.8) 9 2008-2012 * *
Isabella County 6,10 19.9 # (15.1, 25.8) 12 2008-2012 * *
Roscommon County 6,10 19.8 # (12.8, 29.6) 7 2008-2012 * *
Oceana County 6,10 19.2 # (12.8, 27.8) 6 2008-2012 * *
Bay County 6,10 19.2 # (15.8, 23.0) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend -10.7 (-27.8, 10.5)
Kalamazoo County 6,10 19.1 # (16.7, 21.8) 47 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.7 (-19.4, 20.0)
Clinton County 6,10 18.9 # (14.8, 23.9) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend -15.0 (-41.1, 22.6)
Montcalm County 6,10 18.8 # (14.5, 23.9) 14 2008-2012 * *
Antrim County 6,10 18.7 # (12.8, 26.9) 7 2008-2012 * *
Muskegon County 6,10 18.6 # (16.0, 21.7) 36 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.0 (-25.5, 16.1)
Chippewa County 6,10 18.6 # (13.3, 25.5) 8 2008-2012 * *
Macomb County 7,8 18.6 (17.3, 19.9) 175 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Genesee County 6,10 18.5 # (16.7, 20.3) 86 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.3 (-18.0, 11.6)
Newaygo County 6,10 18.2 # (13.5, 24.0) 11 2008-2012 * *
Menominee County 6,10 18.0 # (11.7, 26.8) 6 2008-2012 * *
Houghton County 6,10 17.8 # (11.9, 25.6) 6 2008-2012 * *
Wexford County 6,10 17.8 # (12.0, 25.4) 6 2008-2012 * *
Clare County 6,10 17.7 # (12.2, 24.9) 7 2008-2012 * *
Branch County 6,10 17.5 # (12.7, 23.6) 9 2008-2012 * *
Calhoun County 6,10 17.4 # (14.6, 20.7) 28 2008-2012 falling falling trend -11.4 (-19.2, -2.8)
Cass County 6,10 17.4 # (12.9, 23.0) 11 2008-2012 * *
Presque Isle County 6,10 17.3 # (9.1, 30.6) 3 2008-2012 * *
Barry County 6,10 17.2 # (12.9, 22.5) 12 2008-2012 * *
Missaukee County 6,10 16.7 # (9.3, 28.0) 3 2008-2012 * *
Monroe County 6,10 16.4 # (13.8, 19.5) 28 2008-2012 stable stable trend -11.6 (-39.4, 28.9)
Van Buren County 6,10 15.8 # (12.1, 20.3) 13 2008-2012 * *
Gratiot County 6,10 15.7 # (11.0, 21.7) 7 2008-2012 * *
Marquette County 6,10 14.9 # (11.2, 19.5) 12 2008-2012 * *
Sanilac County 6,10 14.7 # (10.4, 20.4) 8 2008-2012 * *
Saginaw County 6,10 14.7 # (12.5, 17.1) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.5 (-20.7, 10.3)
Ionia County 6,10 14.4 # (10.6, 19.1) 10 2008-2012 * *
Iosco County 6,10 14.3 # (9.5, 21.2) 6 2008-2012 * *
Alcona County 6,10 14.1 # (8.3, 26.2) 4 2008-2012 * *
Arenac County 6,10 14.0 # (8.2, 23.1) 4 2008-2012 * *
Ogemaw County 6,10 13.7 # (8.1, 22.0) 4 2008-2012 * *
St. Joseph County 6,10 13.6 # (9.8, 18.3) 9 2008-2012 * *
Delta County 6,10 12.8 # (8.4, 18.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
Hillsdale County 6,10 11.5 # (7.9, 16.4) 7 2008-2012 * *
Wayne County 7,8 11.3 (10.6, 12.0) 217 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Dickinson County 6,10 10.5 # (6.1, 17.3) 4 2008-2012 * *
Mason County 6,10 9.0 # (5.5, 14.5) 4 2008-2012 * *
Alger County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Baraga County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Crawford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Gogebic County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Iron County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Keweenaw County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Lake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Luce County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Mackinac County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ontonagon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Oscoda County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Schoolcraft County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/03/2015 11:21 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top