Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Cervix, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Michigan 5,10 6.9 # (6.6, 7.2) 354 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.4, 2.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 7.7 (7.6, 7.8) 12,476 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -0.9)
Alcona County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Alger County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Allegan County 6,10 5.7 # (3.2, 9.4) 3 2008-2012 * *
Alpena County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Antrim County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Arenac County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Baraga County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Barry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Bay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Benzie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Berrien County 6,10 6.6 # (4.3, 9.7) 5 2008-2012 * *
Branch County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Calhoun County 6,10 9.4 # (6.4, 13.3) 7 2008-2012 * *
Cass County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Charlevoix County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Cheboygan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Chippewa County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Clare County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Clinton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Crawford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Delta County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Dickinson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Eaton County 6,10 10.3 # (6.7, 15.0) 5 2008-2012 * *
Emmet County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Genesee County 6,10 9.6 # (7.8, 11.6) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.5 (-25.4, 37.9)
Gladwin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Gogebic County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Grand Traverse County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Gratiot County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Hillsdale County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Houghton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Huron County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ingham County 6,10 8.4 # (6.3, 11.1) 11 2008-2012 * *
Ionia County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Iosco County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Iron County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Isabella County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Jackson County 6,10 7.0 # (4.5, 10.4) 5 2008-2012 * *
Kalamazoo County 6,10 7.5 # (5.5, 10.1) 9 2008-2012 * *
Kalkaska County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Kent County 6,10 6.0 # (4.8, 7.5) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.3 (-27.5, 18.5)
Keweenaw County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Lake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Lapeer County 6,10 8.0 # (4.5, 13.1) 3 2008-2012 * *
Leelanau County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Lenawee County 6,10 7.2 # (4.3, 11.5) 4 2008-2012 * *
Livingston County 6,10 5.9 # (3.8, 8.8) 5 2008-2012 * *
Luce County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Mackinac County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Macomb County 7,8 6.4 (5.4, 7.5) 30 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Manistee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Marquette County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Mason County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Mecosta County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Menominee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Midland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Missaukee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Monroe County 6,10 5.5 # (3.4, 8.5) 4 2008-2012 * *
Montcalm County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Montmorency County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Muskegon County 6,10 6.6 # (4.3, 9.7) 5 2008-2012 * *
Newaygo County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Oakland County 7,8 6.0 (5.2, 6.9) 40 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.9)
Oceana County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ogemaw County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ontonagon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Osceola County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Oscoda County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Otsego County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ottawa County 6,10 6.7 # (4.7, 9.1) 8 2008-2012 * *
Presque Isle County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Roscommon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Saginaw County 6,10 5.9 # (3.9, 8.5) 6 2008-2012 * *
Sanilac County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Schoolcraft County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Shiawassee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
St. Clair County 6,10 8.0 # (5.5, 11.3) 7 2008-2012 * *
St. Joseph County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Tuscola County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Van Buren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Washtenaw County 6,10 5.6 # (4.1, 7.5) 10 2008-2012 * *
Wayne County 7,8 9.1 (8.3, 10.0) 89 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Wexford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/30/2015 6:08 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top