Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Lung & Bronchus, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Mississippi 6,10 56.9 (55.3, 58.5) 1,009 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 54.1 (53.9, 54.2) 99,801 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Adams County 6,10 58.7 (45.3, 75.2) 14 2008-2012 * *
Alcorn County 6,10 52.3 (40.5, 66.8) 14 2008-2012 * *
Amite County 6,10 57.3 (38.6, 83.6) 6 2008-2012 * *
Attala County 6,10 43.4 (29.3, 62.7) 6 2008-2012 * *
Benton County 6,10 55.9 (31.8, 92.6) 3 2008-2012 * *
Bolivar County 6,10 54.5 (40.9, 71.3) 11 2008-2012 * *
Calhoun County 6,10 70.8 (50.2, 97.9) 8 2008-2012 * *
Carroll County 6,10 47.1 (27.6, 77.0) 4 2008-2012 * *
Chickasaw County 6,10 49.8 (33.5, 72.0) 6 2008-2012 * *
Choctaw County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Claiborne County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Clarke County 6,10 49.8 (33.4, 72.3) 6 2008-2012 * *
Clay County 6,10 59.5 (42.7, 81.2) 8 2008-2012 * *
Coahoma County 6,10 52.8 (37.6, 72.1) 8 2008-2012 * *
Copiah County 6,10 58.7 (43.9, 77.1) 11 2008-2012 * *
Covington County 6,10 52.2 (36.1, 73.8) 7 2008-2012 * *
DeSoto County 6,10 64.2 (56.5, 72.7) 51 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.9 (-9.9, 12.9)
Forrest County 6,10 70.5 (59.1, 83.4) 28 2008-2012 stable stable trend 8.8 (-23.0, 53.9)
Franklin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
George County 6,10 55.7 (38.7, 77.9) 7 2008-2012 * *
Greene County 6,10 46.8 (26.6, 77.0) 3 2008-2012 * *
Grenada County 6,10 74.3 (55.8, 97.4) 11 2008-2012 * *
Hancock County 6,10 60.7 (48.3, 75.6) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.2 (-25.1, 20.2)
Harrison County 6,10 72.1 (64.9, 79.8) 75 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.8 (-21.6, 15.6)
Hinds County 6,10 49.3 (44.1, 55.0) 67 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.2 (-12.6, 7.2)
Holmes County 6,10 69.0 (48.6, 95.2) 8 2008-2012 * *
Humphreys County 6,10 63.9 (38.1, 101.4) 4 2008-2012 * *
Issaquena County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Itawamba County 6,10 55.9 (40.3, 76.2) 9 2008-2012 * *
Jackson County 6,10 67.9 (60.0, 76.6) 55 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.5 (-19.1, 20.0)
Jasper County 6,10 52.3 (35.0, 75.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
Jefferson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Jefferson Davis County 6,10 58.6 (38.5, 86.8) 6 2008-2012 * *
Jones County 6,10 41.3 (33.1, 51.0) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -13.4 (-36.6, 18.2)
Kemper County 6,10 51.1 (29.6, 83.2) 3 2008-2012 * *
Lafayette County 6,10 49.6 (37.5, 64.5) 11 2008-2012 * *
Lamar County 6,10 53.2 (41.8, 66.7) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.5 (-30.0, 50.0)
Lauderdale County 6,10 51.9 (43.3, 61.8) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.8 (-14.3, 25.7)
Lawrence County 6,10 86.9 (60.9, 121.1) 7 2008-2012 * *
Leake County 6,10 44.9 (30.7, 63.8) 6 2008-2012 * *
Lee County 6,10 62.9 (53.3, 73.8) 31 2008-2012 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.2, 9.2)
Leflore County 6,10 67.0 (50.8, 86.7) 12 2008-2012 * *
Lincoln County 6,10 45.8 (33.8, 60.8) 10 2008-2012 * *
Lowndes County 6,10 57.2 (46.7, 69.5) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend -9.4 (-19.8, 2.3)
Madison County 6,10 59.6 (50.2, 70.2) 30 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.8 (-25.8, 19.6)
Marion County 6,10 66.0 (49.8, 86.2) 11 2008-2012 * *
Marshall County 6,10 57.1 (43.7, 73.3) 13 2008-2012 * *
Monroe County 6,10 53.0 (41.1, 67.6) 14 2008-2012 * *
Montgomery County 6,10 42.3 (24.9, 69.0) 4 2008-2012 * *
Neshoba County 6,10 47.0 (33.6, 64.0) 8 2008-2012 * *
Newton County 6,10 39.0 (25.6, 57.3) 5 2008-2012 * *
Noxubee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Oktibbeha County 6,10 40.6 (29.2, 55.0) 8 2008-2012 * *
Panola County 6,10 55.3 (41.5, 72.2) 11 2008-2012 * *
Pearl River County 6,10 67.6 (55.9, 81.2) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.6 (-17.6, 22.8)
Perry County 6,10 77.1 (51.6, 111.4) 6 2008-2012 * *
Pike County 6,10 44.3 (33.5, 57.6) 12 2008-2012 * *
Pontotoc County 6,10 52.6 (38.6, 70.2) 10 2008-2012 * *
Prentiss County 6,10 56.8 (41.9, 75.6) 10 2008-2012 * *
Quitman County 6,10 66.5 (39.2, 106.8) 4 2008-2012 * *
Rankin County 6,10 58.2 (50.9, 66.3) 47 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-8.8, 9.4)
Scott County 6,10 56.7 (41.6, 75.7) 9 2008-2012 * *
Sharkey County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Simpson County 6,10 55.6 (41.0, 74.1) 10 2008-2012 * *
Smith County 6,10 42.2 (27.0, 63.9) 5 2008-2012 * *
Stone County 6,10 62.1 (41.9, 88.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
Sunflower County 6,10 46.9 (32.5, 65.6) 7 2008-2012 * *
Tallahatchie County 6,10 64.7 (42.9, 94.3) 6 2008-2012 * *
Tate County 6,10 68.4 (51.4, 89.2) 11 2008-2012 * *
Tippah County 6,10 51.3 (36.0, 71.4) 7 2008-2012 * *
Tishomingo County 6,10 54.0 (38.2, 74.9) 8 2008-2012 * *
Tunica County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Union County 6,10 52.0 (37.5, 70.6) 9 2008-2012 * *
Walthall County 6,10 34.0 (20.7, 53.8) 4 2008-2012 * *
Warren County 6,10 64.1 (51.8, 78.6) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.3 (-19.5, 6.6)
Washington County 6,10 54.9 (43.6, 68.3) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.8 (-19.6, 19.8)
Wayne County 6,10 52.6 (36.2, 74.3) 7 2008-2012 * *
Webster County 6,10 69.0 (43.8, 104.6) 5 2008-2012 * *
Wilkinson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Winston County 6,10 55.0 (38.0, 77.5) 7 2008-2012 * *
Yalobusha County 6,10 92.1 (67.0, 124.9) 9 2008-2012 * *
Yazoo County 6,10 54.6 (39.1, 74.4) 8 2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/02/2015 2:19 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top