Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Ovary, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Mississippi 6,10 9.9 (9.2, 10.6) 167 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.8 (-12.6, 6.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 12.0 (12.0, 12.1) 21,341 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.7)
Madison County 6,10 7.3 (4.4, 11.4) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -21.2 (-54.2, 35.6)
Rankin County 6,10 7.8 (5.2, 11.2) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.8 (-15.7, 16.7)
Jones County 6,10 8.6 (5.0, 14.1) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.2 (-40.5, 89.3)
Forrest County 6,10 9.6 (5.8, 15.0) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -18.8 (-34.7, 1.0)
Harrison County 6,10 9.8 (7.2, 13.1) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.0, 7.8)
Hinds County 6,10 10.2 (7.8, 13.0) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.3 (-10.4, 26.1)
Pearl River County 6,10 10.5 (5.9, 17.3) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -29.9 (-66.6, 47.1)
Jackson County 6,10 11.1 (8.0, 15.1) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -13.8 (-50.6, 50.7)
Washington County 6,10 11.3 (6.6, 18.0) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.7 (-42.0, 37.4)
DeSoto County 6,10 11.3 (8.3, 15.2) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -16.5 (-37.0, 10.7)
Lee County 6,10 11.8 (7.9, 17.1) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1 (-30.5, 41.0)
Lauderdale County 6,10 12.0 (8.0, 17.4) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.1 (-50.7, 78.9)
Alcorn County 6,10 13.3 (7.5, 22.0) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.6 (-35.9, 39.0)
Lowndes County 6,10 16.6 (11.1, 24.1) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.7 (-20.2, 32.2)
Union County 6,10 21.3 (12.0, 34.9) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.7 (-38.2, 50.1)
Adams County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Amite County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Attala County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Benton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Bolivar County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Calhoun County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Carroll County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Chickasaw County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Choctaw County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Claiborne County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Clarke County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Clay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Coahoma County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Copiah County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Covington County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Franklin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
George County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Greene County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Grenada County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Hancock County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Holmes County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Humphreys County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Issaquena County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Itawamba County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jasper County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jefferson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jefferson Davis County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Kemper County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lafayette County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lamar County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lawrence County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Leake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Leflore County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lincoln County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Marion County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Marshall County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Monroe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Montgomery County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Neshoba County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Newton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Noxubee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Oktibbeha County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Panola County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Perry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Pike County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Pontotoc County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Prentiss County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Quitman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Scott County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Sharkey County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Simpson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Smith County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Stone County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Sunflower County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Tallahatchie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Tate County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Tippah County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Tishomingo County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Tunica County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Walthall County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Warren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (0.0, 0.0)
Wayne County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Webster County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Wilkinson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Winston County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Yalobusha County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Yazoo County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/24/2014 1:38 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top