Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Colon & Rectum, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Missouri 6,10 38.7 (37.8, 39.6) 1,463 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.1, -0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 36.6 (36.5, 36.7) 67,886 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.4, -3.2)
Stone County 6,10 25.5 (17.2, 37.3) 7 2008-2012 * *
Audrain County 6,10 25.5 (15.8, 39.3) 5 2008-2012 * *
Nodaway County 6,10 25.8 (15.2, 41.9) 4 2008-2012 * *
Camden County 6,10 26.2 (18.8, 36.0) 9 2008-2012 * *
Newton County 6,10 28.4 (21.3, 37.3) 11 2008-2012 * *
Taney County 6,10 29.2 (21.8, 38.6) 11 2008-2012 * *
Randolph County 6,10 29.2 (18.3, 44.8) 5 2008-2012 * *
St. Charles County 6,10 31.3 (27.9, 35.1) 61 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.1 (-10.3, 7.0)
Douglas County 6,10 31.8 (17.5, 54.5) 3 2008-2012 * *
Laclede County 6,10 32.0 (22.3, 44.7) 7 2008-2012 * *
Platte County 6,10 32.3 (25.5, 40.4) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend -9.7 (-37.2, 29.8)
Cape Girardeau County 6,10 32.3 (25.6, 40.4) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.8 (-22.2, 14.1)
Cass County 6,10 33.1 (26.8, 40.5) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend 7.2 (-10.8, 28.9)
Livingston County 6,10 33.1 (19.5, 53.5) 4 2008-2012 * *
Andrew County 6,10 33.2 (20.4, 52.0) 4 2008-2012 * *
Polk County 6,10 33.8 (22.8, 48.3) 6 2008-2012 * *
Webster County 6,10 33.8 (23.4, 47.4) 7 2008-2012 * *
Perry County 6,10 34.0 (21.3, 52.3) 5 2008-2012 * *
Boone County 6,10 34.3 (28.5, 40.9) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.0 (-31.9, 41.1)
Warren County 6,10 34.8 (23.9, 49.2) 7 2008-2012 * *
Pettis County 6,10 35.4 (26.1, 47.1) 10 2008-2012 * *
Texas County 6,10 35.4 (23.3, 51.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
Morgan County 6,10 35.4 (23.7, 52.3) 6 2008-2012 * *
Greene County 6,10 36.6 (32.6, 41.1) 62 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.9 (-13.1, 4.2)
Miller County 6,10 36.7 (24.7, 53.0) 6 2008-2012 * *
Christian County 6,10 36.7 (28.9, 46.0) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.4 (-25.4, 27.7)
Ste. Genevieve County 6,10 37.0 (23.7, 56.4) 5 2008-2012 * *
Callaway County 6,10 37.5 (27.3, 50.3) 9 2008-2012 * *
Benton County 6,10 37.6 (25.8, 55.1) 7 2008-2012 * *
Osage County 6,10 37.6 (21.2, 62.7) 3 2008-2012 * *
Hickory County 6,10 37.8 (19.3, 69.9) 3 2008-2012 * *
Vernon County 6,10 38.0 (24.8, 56.4) 5 2008-2012 * *
Jackson County 6,10 38.1 (35.4, 41.0) 152 2008-2012 falling falling trend -6.1 (-9.0, -3.0)
Clinton County 6,10 38.2 (24.1, 58.0) 5 2008-2012 * *
Jefferson County 6,10 38.7 (33.7, 44.2) 45 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.1 (-16.4, 7.8)
Lawrence County 6,10 38.8 (28.8, 51.4) 10 2008-2012 * *
St. Louis County 6,10 39.0 (36.9, 41.1) 278 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.7, 6.5)
Scott County 6,10 39.2 (29.2, 51.7) 10 2008-2012 * *
Barry County 6,10 39.2 (28.6, 52.8) 10 2008-2012 * *
Johnson County 6,10 39.4 (28.9, 52.5) 9 2008-2012 * *
New Madrid County 6,10 39.6 (25.8, 58.9) 5 2008-2012 * *
Franklin County 6,10 39.8 (32.9, 47.7) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (-23.5, 30.8)
Lafayette County 6,10 39.9 (29.0, 53.8) 9 2008-2012 * *
Adair County 6,10 41.0 (27.4, 59.4) 6 2008-2012 * *
Gasconade County 6,10 41.2 (25.9, 63.4) 5 2008-2012 * *
Linn County 6,10 41.5 (25.7, 65.3) 4 2008-2012 * *
Wright County 6,10 41.6 (27.5, 61.2) 6 2008-2012 * *
Pemiscot County 6,10 41.7 (26.9, 62.2) 5 2008-2012 * *
Washington County 6,10 41.8 (27.5, 61.0) 6 2008-2012 * *
Wayne County 6,10 42.0 (25.5, 66.8) 4 2008-2012 * *
Clay County 6,10 42.2 (37.2, 47.8) 51 2008-2012 falling falling trend -12.4 (-18.2, -6.2)
Cole County 6,10 42.3 (33.9, 52.3) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-10.8, 8.9)
Cooper County 6,10 42.4 (27.1, 64.3) 5 2008-2012 * *
Oregon County 6,10 42.9 (23.4, 73.3) 3 2008-2012 * *
Lincoln County 6,10 42.9 (32.3, 55.8) 11 2008-2012 * *
Howell County 6,10 43.5 (32.8, 56.8) 12 2008-2012 * *
Buchanan County 6,10 43.7 (36.1, 52.4) 24 2008-2012 falling falling trend -8.1 (-11.3, -4.9)
Grundy County 6,10 44.0 (26.4, 71.4) 4 2008-2012 * *
Cedar County 6,10 44.3 (26.9, 69.8) 4 2008-2012 * *
DeKalb County 6,10 44.5 (24.9, 75.6) 3 2008-2012 * *
Bates County 6,10 45.2 (29.6, 66.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
St. Louis City 6,10 45.2 (40.8, 49.9) 81 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.2 (-15.8, 6.8)
Moniteau County 6,10 45.2 (28.0, 69.9) 4 2008-2012 * *
Phelps County 6,10 45.2 (34.1, 59.1) 12 2008-2012 * *
Dunklin County 6,10 45.6 (33.5, 61.0) 10 2008-2012 * *
Ripley County 6,10 45.9 (28.2, 71.6) 4 2008-2012 * *
Butler County 6,10 46.0 (35.5, 58.9) 14 2008-2012 * *
Crawford County 6,10 46.1 (32.5, 64.1) 8 2008-2012 * *
Jasper County 6,10 46.5 (39.6, 54.3) 33 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.7 (-21.7, 15.9)
Ray County 6,10 46.6 (32.0, 66.0) 7 2008-2012 * *
Saline County 6,10 46.8 (32.3, 65.9) 7 2008-2012 * *
Henry County 6,10 47.4 (34.1, 65.1) 9 2008-2012 * *
Macon County 6,10 47.8 (31.7, 70.5) 6 2008-2012 * *
Iron County 6,10 49.5 (28.2, 81.7) 4 2008-2012 * *
Dent County 6,10 49.9 (32.9, 73.7) 6 2008-2012 * *
Mississippi County 6,10 50.3 (31.4, 77.3) 5 2008-2012 * *
St. Francois County 6,10 50.9 (41.4, 62.2) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.7 (-21.9, 43.1)
Marion County 6,10 51.7 (38.0, 69.1) 10 2008-2012 * *
Stoddard County 6,10 54.9 (41.5, 71.6) 12 2008-2012 * *
Gentry County 6,10 56.4 (32.1, 95.7) 3 2008-2012 * *
Pulaski County 6,10 56.5 (41.8, 74.4) 10 2008-2012 * *
Pike County 6,10 57.7 (39.7, 82.0) 7 2008-2012 * *
Daviess County 6,10 65.7 (38.7, 106.0) 4 2008-2012 * *
Montgomery County 6,10 66.3 (43.4, 98.2) 6 2008-2012 * *
Harrison County 6,10 69.2 (44.1, 105.9) 5 2008-2012 * *
Atchison County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Barton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Bollinger County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Caldwell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Carroll County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Carter County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Chariton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Clark County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Dade County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Dallas County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Holt County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Howard County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Knox County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Lewis County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Madison County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Maries County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
McDonald County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Mercer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Monroe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ozark County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Putnam County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ralls County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Reynolds County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Schuyler County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Scotland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Shannon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Shelby County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
St. Clair County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Sullivan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Worth County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/03/2015 4:38 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top