Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Lung & Bronchus, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countascending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Missouri 6,10 76.2 (75.3, 77.1) 5,236 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 63.7 (63.6, 63.8) 213,812 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.3)
St. Louis County 6,10 69.6 (67.5, 71.8) 850 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Jackson County 6,10 76.2 (73.3, 79.2) 538 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
St. Louis City 6,10 89.7 (84.9, 94.6) 275 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.2, 2.2)
St. Charles County 6,10 74.3 (70.2, 78.5) 257 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.4, 5.1)
Greene County 6,10 69.6 (65.5, 74.0) 215 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.8 (-16.2, 8.1)
Jefferson County 6,10 89.4 (83.7, 95.4) 196 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.0 (-9.9, 4.3)
Clay County 6,10 83.9 (78.4, 89.7) 178 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.2 (-10.0, 13.8)
Jasper County 6,10 81.3 (74.3, 88.8) 102 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.1 (-15.3, 32.8)
Franklin County 6,10 74.5 (67.6, 82.0) 87 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.7 (-10.8, 3.9)
Boone County 6,10 64.3 (58.2, 70.9) 84 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.8 (-13.2, 6.7)
Buchanan County 6,10 83.0 (75.1, 91.4) 83 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.9 (-4.2, 14.9)
St. Francois County 6,10 108.5 (98.2, 119.6) 82 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.9 (-8.4, 7.3)
Cass County 6,10 69.5 (62.7, 76.8) 79 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (-12.4, 14.2)
Cape Girardeau County 6,10 67.0 (59.5, 75.3) 58 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.7 (-13.7, 7.6)
Taney County 6,10 80.2 (71.0, 90.4) 57 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.3 (-13.2, 18.1)
Cole County 6,10 65.7 (57.9, 74.2) 54 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.1 (-13.1, 12.6)
Platte County 6,10 60.6 (53.3, 68.6) 54 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.2 (-20.8, 8.7)
Butler County 6,10 91.2 (80.4, 103.2) 52 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.3 (-19.7, 18.9)
Christian County 6,10 65.6 (57.8, 74.2) 52 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.3 (-11.2, 0.9)
Camden County 6,10 67.9 (59.3, 77.7) 49 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.3 (-16.0, 27.0)
Scott County 6,10 95.5 (83.4, 108.9) 46 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.1 (-5.8, 17.2)
Howell County 6,10 86.1 (75.1, 98.2) 46 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.2 (-14.3, 4.8)
Lincoln County 6,10 89.4 (77.8, 102.2) 45 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.5 (-24.0, 32.8)
Dunklin County 6,10 100.3 (86.9, 115.4) 41 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.0 (-11.0, 21.5)
Barry County 6,10 80.3 (69.4, 92.7) 40 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.2 (-16.9, 8.1)
Newton County 6,10 56.5 (48.9, 65.2) 40 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.8 (-30.1, 29.6)
Stone County 6,10 67.3 (57.8, 78.3) 39 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.1 (-11.4, 22.2)
Phelps County 6,10 77.8 (67.0, 89.9) 38 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.9 (-22.5, 16.7)
Callaway County 6,10 79.2 (68.0, 91.7) 37 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.6 (-7.6, 9.5)
Pettis County 6,10 76.1 (65.5, 88.0) 37 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.1 (-17.8, 21.5)
Stoddard County 6,10 86.9 (74.5, 101.0) 36 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.5 (-9.9, 14.3)
Laclede County 6,10 77.2 (65.9, 90.0) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.7 (-13.3, 21.7)
Marion County 6,10 92.7 (79.0, 108.1) 34 2008-2012 falling falling trend -7.8 (-14.2, -0.9)
Benton County 6,10 92.7 (78.4, 109.6) 33 2008-2012 stable stable trend 7.5 (-22.6, 49.5)
Lawrence County 6,10 66.6 (56.7, 77.7) 33 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.5 (-18.3, 2.5)
Henry County 6,10 99.1 (84.1, 116.2) 32 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.9 (-19.2, 11.8)
Johnson County 6,10 67.0 (56.9, 78.4) 32 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.1 (-12.6, 14.5)
Pulaski County 6,10 93.7 (79.4, 109.7) 31 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.6 (-18.5, 31.7)
Crawford County 6,10 97.5 (82.6, 114.5) 31 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.3 (-20.2, 24.5)
Lafayette County 6,10 72.3 (61.2, 85.1) 30 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.8 (-9.8, 12.8)
Warren County 6,10 77.2 (65.2, 90.9) 30 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.4 (-18.2, 28.3)
Webster County 6,10 74.5 (62.9, 87.7) 30 2008-2012 stable stable trend -11.2 (-26.6, 7.4)
Audrain County 6,10 90.4 (75.9, 106.9) 28 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.1 (-14.8, 29.5)
Morgan County 6,10 84.6 (70.9, 100.7) 28 2008-2012 stable stable trend 9.3 (-18.9, 47.4)
Ray County 6,10 98.0 (82.2, 116.1) 28 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.1 (-11.1, 10.0)
Texas County 6,10 75.3 (63.2, 89.3) 28 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.6 (-28.3, 29.5)
Miller County 6,10 89.1 (74.6, 105.7) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.7 (-20.7, 40.8)
Wayne County 6,10 120.2 (100.1, 143.8) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.3 (-15.1, 10.2)
Washington County 6,10 84.9 (70.3, 101.8) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.3 (-33.4, 37.5)
New Madrid County 6,10 100.1 (83.1, 120.0) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.8 (-13.2, 31.3)
Polk County 6,10 60.9 (50.4, 73.1) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.1 (-20.6, 34.0)
Randolph County 6,10 80.7 (66.6, 96.9) 23 2008-2012 rising rising trend 10.2 (0.1, 21.3)
Saline County 6,10 80.6 (66.4, 97.0) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend -11.9 (-34.5, 18.5)
Wright County 6,10 86.1 (70.6, 104.4) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.8 (-16.2, 17.4)
Bates County 6,10 89.9 (73.3, 109.4) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.8 (-11.8, 22.2)
Pemiscot County 6,10 93.9 (76.2, 114.6) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.1 (-17.0, 20.4)
Clinton County 6,10 75.2 (60.9, 92.0) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.1 (-31.6, 43.0)
McDonald County 6,10 80.6 (65.0, 98.8) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.2 (-33.3, 26.4)
Mississippi County 6,10 111.7 (90.3, 136.8) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.0 (-25.6, 18.6)
Pike County 6,10 84.7 (68.6, 103.8) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.6 (-22.4, 46.4)
Vernon County 6,10 67.6 (54.5, 83.0) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.4 (-11.6, 25.7)
Ripley County 6,10 92.4 (74.4, 113.9) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend 15.2 (-8.6, 45.1)
Livingston County 6,10 88.4 (70.8, 109.3) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.0 (-28.3, 33.8)
Dallas County 6,10 80.8 (64.8, 100.0) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.2 (-40.7, 42.1)
Nodaway County 6,10 73.5 (58.8, 91.0) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.3 (-14.2, 17.3)
Dent County 6,10 74.7 (59.7, 92.9) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.4 (-38.3, 36.0)
Perry County 6,10 73.5 (58.6, 91.2) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.1 (-21.6, 43.6)
Madison County 6,10 100.6 (80.0, 125.3) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.3 (-9.3, 1.0)
Bollinger County 6,10 100.0 (79.2, 125.0) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.0 (-19.6, 7.6)
Linn County 6,10 91.5 (72.6, 114.5) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.2 (-19.8, 7.3)
Cedar County 6,10 75.4 (59.5, 94.8) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.0 (-33.5, 59.5)
Gasconade County 6,10 66.4 (52.3, 83.8) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.4 (-21.9, 19.6)
Cooper County 6,10 70.8 (55.6, 89.0) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.3 (-17.4, 8.6)
Hickory County 6,10 72.4 (56.6, 93.5) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.1 (-5.6, 14.9)
Iron County 6,10 97.4 (76.5, 123.2) 15 2008-2012 rising rising trend 26.9 (11.0, 45.0)
Montgomery County 6,10 81.7 (63.5, 104.1) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Ste. Genevieve County 6,10 57.8 (44.9, 73.5) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Ozark County 6,10 80.8 (62.5, 104.3) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Adair County 6,10 50.6 (39.0, 64.7) 13 2008-2012
*
*
Carroll County 6,10 96.0 (74.1, 123.3) 13 2008-2012
*
*
St. Clair County 6,10 75.0 (57.4, 97.6) 13 2008-2012
*
*
Caldwell County 6,10 96.8 (73.7, 125.6) 12 2008-2012
*
*
Harrison County 6,10 88.4 (66.7, 115.7) 12 2008-2012
*
*
Oregon County 6,10 66.7 (50.4, 87.6) 12 2008-2012
*
*
Grundy County 6,10 71.8 (53.9, 94.5) 11 2008-2012
*
*
Osage County 6,10 66.8 (50.4, 87.2) 11 2008-2012
*
*
Macon County 6,10 45.7 (34.2, 60.3) 11 2008-2012
*
*
Moniteau County 6,10 63.5 (47.6, 83.1) 11 2008-2012
*
*
Andrew County 6,10 45.7 (33.7, 60.8) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Barton County 6,10 57.6 (42.5, 76.9) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Lewis County 6,10 76.7 (56.8, 101.7) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Douglas County 6,10 48.4 (35.6, 65.1) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Dade County 6,10 83.6 (60.9, 113.3) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Clark County 6,10 92.3 (67.4, 124.6) 9 2008-2012
*
*
Carter County 6,10 105.1 (76.0, 142.8) 9 2008-2012
*
*
Daviess County 6,10 74.6 (53.3, 102.3) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Howard County 6,10 62.9 (45.0, 86.2) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Sullivan County 6,10 86.1 (61.1, 118.8) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Monroe County 6,10 58.9 (41.3, 82.4) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Ralls County 6,10 56.4 (39.5, 78.8) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Atchison County 6,10 76.8 (53.6, 109.0) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Chariton County 6,10 58.1 (40.1, 82.8) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Putnam County 6,10 91.8 (63.9, 129.9) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Reynolds County 6,10 73.0 (50.5, 103.5) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Shannon County 6,10 62.2 (42.7, 88.4) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Maries County 6,10 53.3 (37.0, 75.3) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Shelby County 6,10 76.4 (52.4, 108.8) 7 2008-2012
*
*
DeKalb County 6,10 43.2 (29.6, 61.3) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Gentry County 6,10 65.9 (44.3, 95.5) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Mercer County 6,10 97.6 (65.1, 143.7) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Knox County 6,10 89.0 (58.5, 132.4) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Holt County 6,10 69.4 (44.9, 104.9) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Schuyler County 6,10 73.1 (44.5, 114.7) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Scotland County 6,10 62.9 (38.6, 98.4) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Worth County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/31/2015 1:46 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top