Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Montana by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Cancer Sites, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent AAPC
sort sort by trenddescending
Montana 6,10 456.8 (451.3, 462.5) 5,363 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 459.8 (459.4, 460.1) 1,514,446 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Golden Valley County 6,10 620.1 (427.2, 882.9) 8 2007-2011 falling falling trend -27.1 (-46.3, -1.1)
Treasure County 6,10 596.7 (398.4, 878.7) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.3 (-46.1, 49.4)
Musselshell County 6,10 579.6 (494.0, 677.5) 38 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.8 (-12.8, 23.5)
Fallon County 6,10 571.0 (465.7, 694.7) 22 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.7 (-15.6, 5.2)
Stillwater County 6,10 519.2 (461.2, 583.2) 63 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.6, 5.3)
Mineral County 6,10 510.9 (430.1, 604.6) 33 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.5 (-3.2, 10.7)
Prairie County 6,10 509.3 (364.1, 705.8) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.4 (-15.7, 34.2)
Dawson County 6,10 508.7 (451.6, 571.5) 62 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1 (-10.9, 14.5)
Sweet Grass County 6,10 507.7 (420.7, 609.4) 26 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.7 (-18.5, 6.9)
Meagher County 6,10 506.1 (392.7, 647.8) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.8 (-14.6, 28.6)
Flathead County 6,10 505.3 (485.9, 525.2) 542 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.2, 7.6)
Judith Basin County 6,10 494.8 (382.2, 634.7) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.7 (-35.3, 23.2)
Hill County 6,10 491.9 (445.2, 542.3) 84 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.5 (-9.8, 9.9)
Custer County 6,10 491.4 (441.7, 545.5) 76 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.1 (-9.9, 15.7)
Yellowstone County 6,10 488.7 (473.6, 504.2) 817 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.1, 3.4)
Richland County 6,10 479.3 (424.2, 540.1) 57 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.6 (-12.6, 12.9)
Roosevelt County 6,10 478.4 (419.3, 543.6) 49 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.7 (-19.8, 28.9)
Blaine County 6,10 477.1 (407.2, 555.8) 35 2007-2011 stable stable trend 7.3 (-17.0, 38.6)
Fergus County 6,10 473.4 (428.3, 522.7) 88 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.3 (-10.9, 11.6)
Rosebud County 6,10 471.6 (408.7, 541.5) 44 2007-2011 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.8, -2.2)
Powell County 6,10 466.8 (405.3, 535.9) 43 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-20.4, 23.0)
Teton County 6,10 465.3 (403.1, 535.6) 43 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.9 (-17.4, 9.5)
Big Horn County 6,10 465.1 (409.4, 526.0) 53 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.1 (-12.5, 23.8)
Beaverhead County 6,10 464.8 (408.5, 527.1) 54 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.1 (-13.4, 1.8)
Glacier County 6,10 464.4 (410.7, 523.0) 56 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.1 (-17.0, 30.6)
Petroleum County 6,10 463.7 (270.9, 784.9) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.6 (-69.1, 234.6)
Lake County 6,10 463.4 (431.8, 496.9) 170 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.3 (-9.7, 5.7)
Cascade County 6,10 462.2 (443.0, 482.0) 450 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.2 (-8.3, 6.5)
Jefferson County 6,10 462.1 (408.7, 520.9) 65 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3 (-19.1, 16.2)
Silver Bow County 6,10 454.5 (425.8, 484.6) 197 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.3, 1.4)
Pondera County 6,10 451.4 (386.7, 524.5) 38 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7 (-18.3, 5.9)
Phillips County 6,10 447.8 (374.5, 533.4) 29 2007-2011 rising rising trend 5.7 (1.2, 10.4)
Lewis and Clark County 6,10 444.9 (422.7, 467.9) 323 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.1 (-11.0, 1.2)
Lincoln County 6,10 441.4 (406.7, 478.8) 134 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.3 (-15.4, 18.9)
Toole County 6,10 439.5 (366.0, 524.1) 26 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.9 (-19.6, 17.3)
Wibaux County 6,10 437.1 (304.8, 622.1) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.4 (-29.6, 11.5)
Chouteau County 6,10 435.2 (370.2, 509.2) 34 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.4 (-19.2, 10.8)
Park County 6,10 434.1 (393.9, 477.6) 91 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.4 (-16.9, 17.0)
Missoula County 6,10 432.4 (414.5, 450.9) 464 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.3, 8.0)
Powder River County 6,10 429.8 (325.2, 567.1) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.5 (-14.3, 20.1)
Sanders County 6,10 429.3 (385.3, 477.8) 79 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.7 (-9.5, 14.3)
Daniels County 6,10 424.1 (316.8, 563.2) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend 7 (-20.2, 43.4)
Gallatin County 6,10 423.8 (402.9, 445.5) 329 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.4 (-7.8, 9.4)
Valley County 6,10 421.4 (367.2, 482.3) 47 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.2 (-21.4, 16.8)
Deer Lodge County 6,10 420.9 (371.7, 475.6) 57 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.7 (-8.4, 17.6)
Ravalli County 6,10 404.7 (380.8, 429.8) 233 2007-2011 falling falling trend -4 (-7.1, -0.8)
Carbon County 6,10 396.9 (350.8, 448.2) 58 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.0, 7.9)
McCone County 6,10 390.2 (278.0, 537.2) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.8 (-41.3, 44.8)
Wheatland County 6,10 387.3 (296.6, 501.6) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.3 (-29.3, 13.8)
Sheridan County 6,10 383.2 (310.9, 471.0) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3 (-11.1, 5.9)
Madison County 6,10 383.0 (332.5, 440.1) 46 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.3 (-18.9, 28.9)
Liberty County 6,10 372.2 (281.8, 485.5) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.7 (-32.9, 13.5)
Broadwater County 6,10 361.3 (301.5, 430.7) 27 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.7 (-13.6, 22.1)
Garfield County 6,10 357.6 (239.6, 520.5) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -15.2 (-50.3, 44.6)
Granite County 6,10 335.1 (259.2, 430.4) 17 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.1 (-18.0, 32.3)
Carter County 6,10 245.1 (149.9, 391.7) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2 (-35.1, 60.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/31/2014 7:13 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are EAPCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top