Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Colon & Rectum, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Nebraska 6,10 48.4 (47.0, 49.8) 969 2007-2011 falling falling trend -6 (-8.9, -3.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 43.3 (43.2, 43.4) 142,173 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -4.1 (-4.9, -3.3)
Adams County 6,10 58.2 (47.8, 70.2) 23 2007-2011 falling falling trend -9.9 (-13.7, -6.0)
Antelope County 6,10 56.0 (37.2, 82.7) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (0.0, 0.0)
Arthur County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Banner County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Blaine County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Boone County 6,10 49.1 (28.2, 80.9) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -22.3 (-56.0, 37.2)
Box Butte County 6,10 34.4 (22.0, 51.8) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.1 (-47.0, 66.3)
Boyd County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Brown County 6,10 59.5 (34.3, 102.2) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -14.9 (-51.1, 48.3)
Buffalo County 6,10 48.7 (40.0, 58.7) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend -15.4 (-39.4, 18.2)
Burt County 6,10 42.6 (26.8, 66.2) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.3 (-48.7, 56.6)
Butler County 6,10 57.3 (39.1, 82.0) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -17.9 (-40.7, 13.5)
Cass County 6,10 50.0 (39.0, 63.1) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.8 (-15.4, 16.3)
Cedar County 6,10 39.2 (25.7, 58.7) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -19.2 (-59.5, 61.3)
Chase County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Cherry County 6,10 50.2 (31.7, 77.8) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12 (-51.5, 59.5)
Cheyenne County 6,10 32.4 (19.9, 50.4) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -27.3 (-72.4, 91.2)
Clay County 6,10 51.6 (33.3, 78.2) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.9 (-25.7, 11.8)
Colfax County 6,10 34.4 (20.7, 53.8) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (0.0, 0.0)
Cuming County 6,10 33.9 (21.3, 52.4) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.5 (-30.3, 41.8)
Custer County 6,10 51.2 (36.4, 70.9) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.9 (-32.1, 41.6)
Dakota County 6,10 61.3 (46.7, 79.0) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10 (-20.0, 1.2)
Dawes County 6,10 30.1 (16.6, 50.8) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 12.7 (-27.4, 75.0)
Dawson County 6,10 62.2 (49.5, 77.4) 17 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6 (-26.0, 19.6)
Deuel County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Dixon County 6,10 62.8 (39.6, 95.5) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.2 (-23.0, 35.7)
Dodge County 6,10 53.5 (44.5, 63.9) 26 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.1 (-15.1, 8.3)
Douglas County 6,10 47.6 (44.8, 50.5) 224 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6 (-15.4, 4.5)
Dundy County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Fillmore County 6,10 43.2 (25.0, 71.2) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -14.2 (-28.2, 2.6)
Franklin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Frontier County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.7 (-45.1, 72.1)
Furnas County 6,10 68.8 (44.8, 104.0) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -18.9 (-41.4, 12.2)
Gage County 6,10 47.7 (37.7, 60.0) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.3 (-26.0, 13.6)
Garden County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Garfield County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Gosper County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Grant County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Greeley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Hall County 6,10 56.4 (48.4, 65.3) 37 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.2 (-23.7, 8.0)
Hamilton County 6,10 27.0 (15.6, 44.6) 3 2007-2011 falling falling trend -40.1 (-59.8, -10.8)
Harlan County 6,10 70.0 (42.7, 113.3) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8 (-42.2, 101.8)
Hayes County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Hitchcock County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Holt County 6,10 57.8 (41.4, 79.3) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.7 (-5.9, 18.8)
Hooker County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Howard County 6,10 50.9 (31.9, 78.6) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -22.9 (-44.3, 6.7)
Jefferson County 6,10 42.5 (27.0, 65.1) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1 (-10.2, 13.6)
Johnson County 6,10 60.2 (38.2, 92.3) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -18.2 (-49.9, 33.7)
Kearney County 6,10 61.7 (40.5, 91.3) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 14.5 (-21.0, 65.9)
Keith County 6,10 59.6 (41.5, 84.1) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 12.8 (-8.2, 38.7)
Keya Paha County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Kimball County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Knox County 6,10 53.7 (36.8, 76.9) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.1 (-13.1, 34.4)
Lancaster County 6,10 43.2 (39.6, 46.9) 113 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6 (-17.7, 7.4)
Lincoln County 6,10 46.9 (38.1, 57.2) 21 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.5 (-17.6, 3.9)
Logan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Loup County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Madison County 6,10 54.6 (44.9, 65.9) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.7 (-15.8, 12.6)
McPherson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Merrick County 6,10 42.1 (26.5, 64.7) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -23 (-52.9, 25.9)
Morrill County 6,10 48.3 (27.9, 79.7) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 19.2 (-29.4, 101.0)
Nance County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Nemaha County 6,10 46.3 (29.5, 70.7) 5 2007-2011 falling falling trend -22.6 (-38.2, -3.2)
Nuckolls County 6,10 56.4 (33.5, 92.0) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.5 (-41.0, 38.9)
Otoe County 6,10 41.6 (30.3, 56.3) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5 (-37.9, 45.4)
Pawnee County 6,10 67.7 (40.2, 115.5) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -24.2 (-53.2, 23.0)
Perkins County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Phelps County 6,10 46.5 (31.2, 67.6) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 13.7 (-24.9, 72.1)
Pierce County 6,10 61.8 (42.3, 88.6) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 12.6 (-46.3, 136.0)
Platte County 6,10 56.6 (46.2, 68.8) 21 2007-2011 stable stable trend -13.1 (-34.7, 15.6)
Polk County 6,10 39.4 (22.3, 66.8) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.6 (-37.9, 28.8)
Red Willow County 6,10 49.2 (35.1, 67.9) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.1 (-35.2, 24.5)
Richardson County 6,10 66.4 (48.2, 90.7) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.9 (-31.1, 23.1)
Rock County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Saline County 6,10 76.4 (58.1, 98.8) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.4 (-30.5, 26.1)
Sarpy County 6,10 46.3 (40.7, 52.4) 54 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.2 (-13.5, 10.7)
Saunders County 6,10 51.7 (39.7, 66.3) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.6 (-26.5, 13.7)
Scotts Bluff County 6,10 46.6 (38.0, 56.8) 21 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.8 (-32.5, 34.2)
Seward County 6,10 50.7 (37.8, 67.0) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.2 (-26.7, 39.7)
Sheridan County 6,10 67.6 (42.3, 103.7) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.8 (-43.1, 59.3)
Sherman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Sioux County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Stanton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Thayer County 6,10 41.9 (25.7, 68.4) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.2 (-18.9, 44.3)
Thomas County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Thurston County 6,10 64.6 (40.4, 98.1) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 17.5 (-11.9, 56.8)
Valley County 6,10 48.3 (28.0, 81.3) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 33.7 (-9.7, 97.8)
Washington County 6,10 46.8 (35.0, 61.5) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.9 (-10.9, 28.3)
Wayne County 6,10 40.4 (24.8, 62.7) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -13.4 (-43.1, 31.9)
Webster County 6,10 86.4 (57.6, 128.9) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.2 (-45.8, 83.8)
Wheeler County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
York County 6,10 35.3 (23.5, 51.1) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -20.1 (-47.3, 21.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/25/2014 11:04 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top