Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

All Cancer Sites, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
New Mexico 3,8 388.1 (384.4, 391.8) 8,765 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 453.8 (453.5, 454.1) 1,526,274 § falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Bernalillo County 7,8 404.1 (397.4, 411.0) 2,820 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.0, 1.1)
Catron County 7,8 375.5 (306.6, 460.3) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Chaves County 7,8 375.8 (355.8, 396.7) 272 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.7, -0.7)
Cibola County 7,8 375.5 (344.1, 409.0) 109 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Colfax County 7,8 377.4 (338.1, 420.5) 76 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.2, 8.3)
Curry County 7,8 336.5 (312.9, 361.3) 153 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
De Baca County 7,8 467.1 (351.3, 612.0) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.8, 3.4)
Dona Ana County 7,8 381.0 (369.2, 393.2) 799 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.3)
Eddy County 7,8 391.3 (369.0, 414.6) 239 stable stable trend -6.3 (-13.6, 1.6)
Grant County 7,8 366.5 (340.4, 394.2) 166 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Guadalupe County 7,8 361.2 (293.5, 440.9) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Harding County 7,8 498.9 (324.3, 767.2) 7 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.4, 6.4)
Hidalgo County 7,8 357.0 (292.2, 432.7) 22 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.1)
Lea County 7,8 357.1 (335.8, 379.3) 214 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Lincoln County 7,8 363.9 (332.5, 397.8) 117 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Los Alamos County 7,8 406.2 (368.8, 446.6) 94 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Luna County 7,8 420.6 (389.3, 453.9) 144 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
McKinley County 7,8 332.9 (312.4, 354.3) 205 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
Mora County 7,8 359.0 (295.8, 433.2) 25 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Otero County 7,8 393.0 (372.5, 414.3) 286 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Quay County 7,8 412.7 (363.3, 467.7) 56 stable stable trend -4.7 (-9.8, 0.8)
Rio Arriba County 7,8 351.8 (327.5, 377.4) 164 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Roosevelt County 7,8 360.7 (323.0, 401.5) 68 stable stable trend -4.7 (-10.2, 1.2)
San Juan County 7,8 356.1 (341.0, 371.6) 435 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
San Miguel County 7,8 355.6 (327.3, 385.7) 125 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Sandoval County 7,8 395.4 (380.5, 410.7) 564 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.8)
Santa Fe County 7,8 374.3 (361.3, 387.6) 691 falling falling trend -6.1 (-10.9, -1.0)
Sierra County 7,8 424.2 (382.0, 470.8) 100 stable stable trend -8.5 (-18.3, 2.5)
Socorro County 7,8 404.4 (365.6, 446.3) 84 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 1.0)
Taos County 7,8 339.0 (314.3, 365.2) 154 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Torrance County 7,8 558.5 (510.0, 610.6) 108 rising rising trend 17.1 (1.9, 34.4)
Union County 7,8 303.0 (242.8, 375.0) 18 falling falling trend -19.6 (-34.3, -1.6)
Valencia County 7,8 402.3 (382.7, 422.6) 334 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/03/2016 9:54 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top