Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for New York by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Melanoma of the Skin, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
New York 6,10 14.1 (13.7, 14.4) 1,607 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.4, 4.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 15.9 (15.8, 16.0) 27,524 § 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Schuyler County 6,10 33.7 (20.9, 52.4) 4 2008-2012 * *
Wyoming County 6,10 31.1 (21.0, 44.5) 6 2008-2012 * *
St. Lawrence County 6,10 27.1 (21.3, 34.1) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.7 (-16.5, 8.6)
Yates County 6,10 25.3 (14.1, 41.6) 3 2008-2012 * *
Tioga County 6,10 23.1 (15.7, 32.9) 7 2008-2012 * *
Essex County 6,10 23.1 (15.0, 34.3) 6 2008-2012 * *
Ontario County 6,10 23.1 (18.0, 29.2) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.5 (-13.4, 26.3)
Lewis County 6,10 22.6 (12.6, 37.4) 3 2008-2012 * *
Cayuga County 6,10 22.1 (16.2, 29.6) 10 2008-2012 * *
Orleans County 6,10 21.3 (13.9, 31.4) 5 2008-2012 * *
Tompkins County 6,10 20.9 (15.3, 27.7) 10 2008-2012 * *
Chenango County 6,10 20.6 (13.6, 29.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
Madison County 6,10 20.5 (14.5, 28.1) 8 2008-2012 * *
Erie County 6,10 20.4 (18.7, 22.2) 116 2008-2012 rising rising trend 13.0 (1.3, 26.1)
Seneca County 6,10 20.2 (11.9, 32.1) 4 2008-2012 * *
Schoharie County 6,10 20.1 (11.4, 32.7) 4 2008-2012 * *
Chemung County 6,10 20.0 (14.8, 26.6) 11 2008-2012 * *
Monroe County 6,10 20.0 (18.1, 22.0) 86 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.6 (-22.5, 41.2)
Steuben County 6,10 19.7 (14.6, 26.1) 11 2008-2012 * *
Wayne County 6,10 19.5 (14.4, 25.9) 10 2008-2012 * *
Nassau County 6,10 19.5 (18.1, 20.9) 165 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.8 (-10.8, 8.0)
Livingston County 6,10 19.4 (13.0, 27.8) 6 2008-2012 * *
Chautauqua County 6,10 19.4 (15.1, 24.5) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.9 (-31.8, 58.2)
Suffolk County 6,10 18.7 (17.5, 20.1) 166 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.6, 0.6)
Columbia County 6,10 18.5 (12.5, 26.6) 7 2008-2012 * *
Broome County 6,10 18.2 (14.8, 22.3) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend 8.5 (-21.3, 49.8)
Saratoga County 6,10 18.2 (15.0, 21.8) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.0 (-17.4, 26.0)
Allegany County 6,10 18.0 (11.2, 27.3) 5 2008-2012 * *
Greene County 6,10 17.8 (11.6, 26.5) 6 2008-2012 * *
Putnam County 6,10 17.7 (13.0, 23.5) 10 2008-2012 * *
Washington County 6,10 17.6 (11.8, 25.3) 6 2008-2012 * *
Warren County 6,10 17.4 (11.7, 24.8) 7 2008-2012 * *
Delaware County 6,10 17.1 (11.3, 25.2) 6 2008-2012 * *
Niagara County 6,10 17.1 (14.0, 20.7) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend 11.3 (-7.1, 33.4)
Genesee County 6,10 17.1 (11.3, 24.8) 6 2008-2012 * *
Rensselaer County 6,10 16.9 (13.3, 21.2) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 12.3 (-23.5, 64.8)
Otsego County 6,10 16.8 (11.4, 23.9) 7 2008-2012 * *
Ulster County 6,10 16.1 (12.8, 19.9) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend 9.6 (-15.2, 41.7)
Oswego County 6,10 15.9 (11.7, 21.1) 10 2008-2012 * *
Sullivan County 6,10 15.8 (11.0, 22.1) 7 2008-2012 * *
Albany County 6,10 15.8 (13.3, 18.7) 29 2008-2012 stable stable trend 8.0 (-14.5, 36.3)
Clinton County 6,10 15.4 (10.7, 21.6) 7 2008-2012 * *
New York County 6,10 15.1 (14.0, 16.3) 150 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.4 (-17.6, 10.9)
Westchester County 6,10 15.0 (13.6, 16.5) 89 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.7 (-13.0, 6.7)
Montgomery County 6,10 14.9 (9.1, 23.2) 4 2008-2012 * *
Rockland County 6,10 14.9 (12.4, 17.7) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.8 (-14.8, 13.1)
Onondaga County 6,10 14.8 (12.7, 17.0) 39 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.7 (-14.4, 13.0)
Oneida County 6,10 14.4 (11.5, 17.7) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.2 (-36.7, 35.9)
Richmond County 6,10 14.3 (12.3, 16.5) 39 2008-2012 stable stable trend 8.6 (-15.6, 39.8)
Schenectady County 6,10 14.1 (10.8, 18.2) 13 2008-2012 * *
Herkimer County 6,10 13.9 (8.9, 20.6) 6 2008-2012 * *
Dutchess County 6,10 13.8 (11.4, 16.6) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-11.1, 12.0)
Jefferson County 6,10 13.2 (9.3, 18.1) 8 2008-2012 * *
Orange County 6,10 12.8 (10.6, 15.2) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.0 (-23.7, 18.4)
Franklin County 6,10 12.4 (7.3, 20.0) 4 2008-2012 * *
Fulton County 6,10 11.6 (7.1, 18.1) 4 2008-2012 * *
Cattaraugus County 6,10 11.1 (7.1, 16.6) 5 2008-2012 * *
Queens County 6,10 7.7 (7.0, 8.4) 104 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.4 (-10.4, 6.3)
Kings County 6,10 7.3 (6.7, 8.0) 103 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.2 (-11.4, 13.4)
Bronx County 6,10 3.6 (3.0, 4.3) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.1 (-19.0, 13.5)
Cortland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Hamilton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/29/2015 5:28 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top