Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for New York by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Ovary, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent AAPC
sort sort by trenddescending
New York 6,10 13.0 (12.7, 13.3) 1,528 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 12.0 (12.0, 12.1) 21,341 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.7)
Kings County 6,10 12.1 (11.3, 13.0) 170 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.7, 0.8)
Queens County 6,10 12.7 (11.9, 13.6) 168 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.6, 7.1)
New York County 6,10 13.8 (12.7, 14.9) 130 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2 (-4.4, 8.8)
Suffolk County 6,10 14.2 (13.1, 15.4) 129 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.3 (-7.0, 8.2)
Nassau County 6,10 14.3 (13.2, 15.5) 127 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.7 (-19.3, 12.6)
Westchester County 6,10 13.7 (12.4, 15.2) 82 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.2, 3.5)
Bronx County 6,10 11.0 (9.9, 12.1) 81 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.1 (-20.5, 13.4)
Erie County 6,10 12.8 (11.6, 14.2) 80 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.1 (-11.2, 5.9)
Monroe County 6,10 11.8 (10.4, 13.3) 55 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.4 (-22.3, 15.2)
Onondaga County 6,10 14.0 (12.1, 16.2) 40 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.3 (-15.2, 10.3)
Richmond County 6,10 13.9 (12.0, 16.0) 39 2007-2011 falling falling trend -10.7 (-18.8, -1.9)
Orange County 6,10 15.1 (12.7, 17.7) 30 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.4 (-27.7, 8.7)
Rockland County 6,10 13.4 (11.1, 16.1) 24 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.9 (-12.8, 10.4)
Dutchess County 6,10 12.8 (10.5, 15.4) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.1 (-22.6, 34.8)
Oneida County 6,10 13.7 (11.1, 16.8) 21 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.1 (-10.4, 14.0)
Albany County 6,10 9.7 (7.8, 11.9) 19 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.9 (-25.2, 18.5)
Niagara County 6,10 12.6 (10.0, 15.6) 18 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.1 (-33.3, 56.4)
Saratoga County 6,10 12.0 (9.5, 15.0) 17 2007-2011 stable stable trend -20.3 (-46.3, 18.2)
Broome County 6,10 12.5 (9.8, 15.7) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.8 (-23.8, 19.0)
Ulster County 6,10 13.7 (10.7, 17.2) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.3 (-27.0, 17.6)
Rensselaer County 6,10 14.2 (11.0, 18.1) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.6 (-22.0, 24.1)
Chautauqua County 6,10 14.0 (10.6, 18.2) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend 12.8 (-17.5, 54.2)
Ontario County 6,10 15.9 (11.9, 20.9) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.4 (-29.9, 52.7)
Chemung County 6,10 18.2 (13.5, 24.0) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.1 (-26.3, 47.1)
Schenectady County 6,10 9.9 (7.3, 13.2) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.8 (-22.1, 35.8)
Steuben County 6,10 14.2 (10.1, 19.3) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -15.1 (-39.2, 18.6)
Putnam County 6,10 12.5 (8.8, 17.3) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.1 (-31.6, 18.0)
Cattaraugus County 6,10 15.4 (10.8, 21.3) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 7.4 (-6.9, 23.9)
Jefferson County 6,10 13.0 (9.2, 18.0) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-41.8, 67.9)
Oswego County 6,10 10.2 (7.1, 14.2) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.8 (-33.8, 48.8)
Genesee County 6,10 18.4 (12.7, 26.0) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.3 (-32.7, 61.7)
Tompkins County 6,10 14.9 (10.3, 21.0) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 7 (-25.3, 53.4)
Wayne County 6,10 11.9 (8.3, 16.8) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 7.5 (-40.9, 95.4)
Warren County 6,10 15.5 (10.6, 22.2) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9 (-52.2, 73.1)
Cayuga County 6,10 12.0 (8.1, 17.2) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.2 (-13.0, 34.4)
Herkimer County 6,10 12.4 (8.3, 18.1) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 25.5 (-36.9, 149.4)
Sullivan County 6,10 11.9 (7.9, 17.4) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.9 (-25.6, 65.3)
Livingston County 6,10 14.2 (9.4, 20.8) 6 2007-2011 falling falling trend -27.9 (-47.0, -2.0)
Allegany County 6,10 19.9 (12.9, 29.4) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 58.1 (-1.2, 152.8)
Chenango County 6,10 15.1 (9.9, 22.5) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -15.8 (-40.4, 19.0)
Otsego County 6,10 11.9 (7.6, 17.9) 5 2007-2011 rising rising trend 20.4 (5.8, 37.1)
St. Lawrence County 6,10 8.1 (5.2, 12.0) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -14.1 (-35.7, 14.9)
Wyoming County 6,10 22.3 (14.4, 33.2) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.2 (-32.3, 38.5)
Columbia County 6,10 12.7 (8.0, 19.2) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.3 (-39.2, 68.7)
Delaware County 6,10 13.9 (8.8, 21.4) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 31.9 (-1.1, 75.9)
Fulton County 6,10 12.9 (8.3, 19.5) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 7.5 (-1.1, 16.7)
Washington County 6,10 12.3 (7.8, 18.7) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.7 (-37.4, 39.2)
Clinton County 6,10 9.5 (6.0, 14.5) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.7 (-15.6, 16.9)
Madison County 6,10 10.3 (6.4, 15.7) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 20.7 (-54.5, 220.6)
Orleans County 6,10 15.9 (10.0, 24.3) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.8 (-43.9, 81.2)
Cortland County 6,10 13.7 (8.3, 21.5) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1 (-43.5, 80.6)
Seneca County 6,10 16.3 (9.5, 26.4) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 20 (-34.6, 120.1)
Tioga County 6,10 12.7 (7.5, 20.2) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.8 (-43.2, 86.0)
Greene County 6,10 11.6 (6.7, 19.0) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.6 (-38.0, 97.4)
Schoharie County 6,10 14.8 (8.3, 24.9) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -16.7 (-51.9, 44.2)
Essex County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend 9.7 (-36.4, 89.1)
Franklin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Hamilton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lewis County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Montgomery County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 rising rising trend 54.6 (3.7, 130.6)
Schuyler County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Yates County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/24/2014 9:29 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are EAPCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top