Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
North Carolina 6,10 71.5 (70.8, 72.2) 7,438 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 63.7 (63.6, 63.8) 213,812 § falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.3)
Mecklenburg County 6,10 59.2 (56.6, 61.8) 434 stable stable trend -1.4 (-9.0, 6.9)
Wake County 6,10 57.3 (54.7, 59.9) 399 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.5)
Guilford County 6,10 71.2 (67.9, 74.6) 364 stable stable trend -4.8 (-10.2, 1.0)
Forsyth County 6,10 72.0 (68.2, 76.0) 274 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.1, 3.8)
Buncombe County 6,10 66.0 (61.9, 70.2) 204 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.2, -0.9)
Cumberland County 6,10 74.2 (69.6, 79.1) 200 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.8, 7.1)
Gaston County 6,10 84.1 (78.9, 89.6) 199 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.6, 7.2)
Davidson County 6,10 85.7 (79.9, 91.7) 170 stable stable trend -1.9 (-10.3, 7.2)
Durham County 6,10 67.6 (62.8, 72.7) 156 stable stable trend -4.0 (-13.7, 6.7)
New Hanover County 6,10 67.8 (63.0, 72.8) 155 stable stable trend -4.2 (-13.2, 5.8)
Randolph County 6,10 90.9 (84.5, 97.7) 153 stable stable trend -3.9 (-10.7, 3.3)
Rowan County 6,10 85.5 (79.2, 92.2) 140 stable stable trend -2.8 (-9.1, 4.0)
Cabarrus County 6,10 78.2 (72.3, 84.5) 133 stable stable trend -2.6 (-8.1, 3.3)
Alamance County 6,10 69.8 (64.4, 75.6) 125 stable stable trend -2.3 (-9.0, 5.0)
Iredell County 6,10 72.1 (66.5, 78.1) 125 stable stable trend -1.0 (-12.9, 12.5)
Catawba County 6,10 68.3 (62.9, 74.0) 124 stable stable trend -5.0 (-12.7, 3.4)
Brunswick County 6,10 67.6 (61.9, 73.7) 118 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.4, 5.2)
Johnston County 6,10 73.8 (67.7, 80.3) 117 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Rockingham County 6,10 92.9 (85.4, 101.0) 115 stable stable trend -6.4 (-13.2, 0.9)
Henderson County 6,10 61.4 (56.3, 67.0) 109 stable stable trend -4.9 (-11.5, 2.3)
Union County 6,10 59.2 (54.0, 64.8) 102 stable stable trend -0.0 (-15.7, 18.4)
Wayne County 6,10 74.2 (67.8, 81.1) 101 stable stable trend -0.9 (-11.3, 10.6)
Moore County 6,10 69.6 (63.5, 76.3) 100 stable stable trend 2.5 (-6.0, 11.7)
Onslow County 6,10 86.0 (78.5, 94.0) 100 stable stable trend -1.7 (-15.3, 14.1)
Craven County 6,10 77.6 (70.7, 84.9) 97 stable stable trend -2.0 (-17.0, 15.7)
Robeson County 6,10 70.7 (64.4, 77.5) 96 stable stable trend 3.3 (-9.1, 17.6)
Pitt County 6,10 65.9 (60.0, 72.2) 95 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.4, 4.6)
Burke County 6,10 80.5 (73.4, 88.3) 94 stable stable trend -1.8 (-19.4, 19.7)
Caldwell County 6,10 88.5 (80.5, 97.2) 93 falling falling trend -6.3 (-9.0, -3.4)
Cleveland County 6,10 76.5 (69.6, 84.0) 92 stable stable trend -2.9 (-8.2, 2.7)
Harnett County 6,10 85.4 (77.5, 93.8) 89 stable stable trend -2.8 (-10.4, 5.5)
Nash County 6,10 75.4 (68.3, 83.1) 86 stable stable trend 1.4 (-8.5, 12.4)
Surry County 6,10 83.1 (75.2, 91.8) 81 stable stable trend -8.0 (-16.0, 0.7)
Carteret County 6,10 80.6 (72.6, 89.3) 79 stable stable trend -9.5 (-21.4, 4.3)
Rutherford County 6,10 76.3 (68.5, 84.8) 72 stable stable trend -4.2 (-13.2, 5.8)
Wilkes County 6,10 75.0 (67.3, 83.3) 72 falling falling trend -6.7 (-8.5, -4.9)
Wilson County 6,10 73.9 (66.3, 82.1) 71 stable stable trend -2.7 (-17.7, 15.0)
Orange County 6,10 60.2 (53.8, 67.1) 70 falling falling trend -9.0 (-13.1, -4.7)
Stanly County 6,10 86.5 (77.4, 96.5) 67 stable stable trend 1.3 (-14.3, 19.6)
Lenoir County 6,10 85.3 (76.3, 95.2) 66 stable stable trend -4.8 (-18.8, 11.5)
Lincoln County 6,10 74.9 (66.8, 83.8) 66 stable stable trend -1.3 (-11.3, 9.7)
Sampson County 6,10 81.0 (72.1, 90.8) 61 stable stable trend 4.2 (-4.1, 13.3)
Haywood County 6,10 64.9 (57.6, 73.0) 60 stable stable trend 7.6 (-11.9, 31.5)
Columbus County 6,10 81.5 (72.3, 91.6) 59 stable stable trend 3.5 (-3.3, 10.8)
Beaufort County 6,10 85.5 (75.8, 96.3) 59 stable stable trend 4.6 (-3.6, 13.5)
Granville County 6,10 85.9 (76.1, 96.8) 57 stable stable trend -2.3 (-9.6, 5.7)
Franklin County 6,10 81.5 (71.9, 92.1) 54 falling falling trend -9.8 (-18.3, -0.5)
Lee County 6,10 80.9 (71.3, 91.5) 52 stable stable trend -5.7 (-14.0, 3.5)
Halifax County 6,10 70.6 (62.2, 80.0) 52 stable stable trend -2.4 (-13.1, 9.5)
Stokes County 6,10 81.9 (72.0, 92.8) 52 stable stable trend 2.3 (-14.3, 22.2)
Richmond County 6,10 88.7 (77.8, 100.6) 50 stable stable trend 3.0 (-8.5, 16.1)
McDowell County 6,10 82.2 (72.2, 93.4) 49 stable stable trend -2.2 (-14.6, 11.9)
Chatham County 6,10 51.7 (45.3, 58.8) 49 stable stable trend -2.9 (-10.7, 5.6)
Pender County 6,10 69.1 (60.4, 78.9) 47 stable stable trend -2.8 (-21.3, 20.0)
Edgecombe County 6,10 66.7 (58.3, 76.1) 46 stable stable trend -3.7 (-18.3, 13.5)
Macon County 6,10 77.1 (67.0, 88.5) 46 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.1, 3.7)
Davie County 6,10 76.3 (66.3, 87.5) 42 stable stable trend 6.0 (-12.9, 28.8)
Duplin County 6,10 59.7 (51.8, 68.6) 42 stable stable trend 0.7 (-5.7, 7.5)
Yadkin County 6,10 79.3 (68.7, 91.4) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-17.2, 19.7)
Person County 6,10 81.9 (70.8, 94.4) 40 stable stable trend -2.9 (-9.8, 4.4)
Vance County 6,10 74.3 (64.2, 85.6) 40 rising rising trend 10.9 (5.1, 17.1)
Cherokee County 6,10 75.5 (64.5, 88.2) 36 stable stable trend 2.7 (-24.4, 39.4)
Alexander County 6,10 77.4 (66.2, 90.2) 35 stable stable trend 0.2 (-18.7, 23.6)
Scotland County 6,10 82.9 (70.8, 96.5) 35 falling falling trend -8.3 (-12.9, -3.3)
Pasquotank County 6,10 73.7 (62.9, 85.9) 34 stable stable trend -6.0 (-27.8, 22.3)
Jackson County 6,10 66.2 (56.2, 77.5) 33 stable stable trend -1.1 (-30.5, 40.8)
Hoke County 6,10 93.4 (78.8, 109.7) 32 stable stable trend -1.5 (-19.2, 20.2)
Ashe County 6,10 74.4 (63.0, 87.5) 32 stable stable trend -6.5 (-25.2, 16.8)
Bladen County 6,10 66.7 (56.2, 78.6) 30 stable stable trend -6.0 (-21.9, 13.2)
Transylvania County 6,10 47.8 (40.3, 56.7) 30 stable stable trend 0.6 (-15.0, 19.2)
Dare County 6,10 66.1 (55.5, 78.4) 29 stable stable trend -12.1 (-23.9, 1.6)
Montgomery County 6,10 76.4 (63.9, 90.9) 27 stable stable trend -5.4 (-21.6, 14.2)
Northampton County 6,10 77.9 (64.9, 93.2) 26 stable stable trend 6.5 (-15.4, 34.1)
Martin County 6,10 75.2 (62.5, 90.0) 26 stable stable trend -11.7 (-29.1, 10.0)
Warren County 6,10 82.9 (68.9, 99.3) 26 stable stable trend -8.0 (-31.9, 24.1)
Watauga County 6,10 51.9 (43.2, 62.0) 26 stable stable trend 2.2 (-16.9, 25.7)
Caswell County 6,10 80.6 (66.8, 96.6) 25 stable stable trend -14.8 (-34.5, 10.9)
Yancey County 6,10 84.8 (70.0, 102.4) 24 stable stable trend 21.7 (-8.2, 61.3)
Hertford County 6,10 66.8 (54.7, 81.0) 22 stable stable trend -4.3 (-40.8, 54.5)
Anson County 6,10 66.5 (54.3, 80.8) 21 stable stable trend 6.9 (-18.1, 39.7)
Polk County 6,10 56.5 (45.8, 69.6) 21 stable stable trend -21.0 (-43.0, 9.3)
Swain County 6,10 107.7 (87.5, 131.6) 20 stable stable trend -9.2 (-17.7, 0.2)
Currituck County 6,10 72.2 (58.0, 88.9) 19 stable stable trend -5.4 (-33.6, 34.8)
Madison County 6,10 65.2 (52.7, 80.2) 19 stable stable trend -3.0 (-24.4, 24.5)
Bertie County 6,10 67.0 (54.1, 82.3) 19 stable stable trend 5.0 (-17.6, 33.9)
Mitchell County 6,10 77.6 (62.6, 95.6) 19 stable stable trend -8.5 (-32.1, 23.4)
Greene County 6,10 80.1 (64.5, 98.4) 19 stable stable trend -8.4 (-28.0, 16.5)
Pamlico County 6,10 82.5 (66.1, 102.6) 19 stable stable trend 8.5 (-19.4, 46.2)
Avery County 6,10 64.4 (50.9, 80.9) 16 stable stable trend -1.7 (-18.7, 18.9)
Clay County 6,10 81.0 (63.7, 103.1) 16 stable stable trend -2.1 (-31.9, 40.8)
Chowan County 6,10 71.8 (56.5, 90.6) 16 stable stable trend 0.7 (-18.3, 24.2)
Perquimans County 6,10 66.5 (51.8, 85.0) 15 stable stable trend -10.3 (-30.0, 15.0)
Jones County 6,10 79.1 (60.2, 103.0) 12
*
*
Alleghany County 6,10 62.9 (47.6, 82.7) 12
*
*
Washington County 6,10 59.2 (44.6, 77.7) 11
*
*
Gates County 6,10 60.6 (44.2, 81.5) 9
*
*
Graham County 6,10 54.7 (38.5, 76.6) 8
*
*
Hyde County 6,10 92.0 (63.1, 130.7) 7
*
*
Tyrrell County 6,10 90.7 (59.1, 135.0) 5
*
*
Camden County 6,10 43.1 (27.6, 64.6) 5
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/27/2016 2:38 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top