Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Cervix, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
North Carolina 6,10 7.1 (6.7, 7.4) 359 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.5, 6.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 7.7 (7.6, 7.8) 12,476 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -0.9)
Sampson County 6,10 18.1 (12.1, 26.1) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Richmond County 6,10 14.1 (8.2, 22.6) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Halifax County 6,10 13.7 (8.1, 21.6) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Vance County 6,10 13.4 (7.8, 21.5) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Lenoir County 6,10 11.6 (6.7, 18.6) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Johnston County 6,10 10.6 (7.8, 14.2) 9 2008-2012
*
*
Duplin County 6,10 10.2 (5.9, 16.7) 3 2008-2012
*
*
Edgecombe County 6,10 10.2 (5.8, 16.7) 3 2008-2012
*
*
Harnett County 6,10 9.7 (6.4, 14.1) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Burke County 6,10 9.6 (6.0, 14.6) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Surry County 6,10 9.1 (5.4, 14.6) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Buncombe County 6,10 8.9 (6.7, 11.6) 12 2008-2012
*
*
Wayne County 6,10 8.9 (5.9, 12.9) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Gaston County 6,10 8.9 (6.5, 11.8) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Rowan County 6,10 8.7 (6.0, 12.3) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Cumberland County 6,10 8.3 (6.4, 10.6) 13 2008-2012
*
*
Moore County 6,10 8.3 (4.9, 13.1) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Nash County 6,10 8.3 (5.1, 12.6) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Onslow County 6,10 7.5 (4.8, 11.1) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Davidson County 6,10 7.1 (4.9, 10.1) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Mecklenburg County 6,10 7.1 (6.1, 8.3) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.7 (-10.2, 9.7)
Randolph County 6,10 7.1 (4.6, 10.4) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Union County 6,10 7.1 (4.9, 9.8) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Durham County 6,10 7.0 (5.1, 9.3) 9 2008-2012
*
*
Cleveland County 6,10 7.0 (4.1, 11.1) 4 2008-2012
*
*
New Hanover County 6,10 6.6 (4.5, 9.3) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Robeson County 6,10 6.5 (4.0, 9.8) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Brunswick County 6,10 6.2 (3.4, 10.3) 3 2008-2012
*
*
Catawba County 6,10 6.0 (3.9, 8.9) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Rockingham County 6,10 6.0 (3.4, 9.8) 3 2008-2012
*
*
Guilford County 6,10 5.9 (4.7, 7.4) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 8.6 (-18.1, 44.1)
Cabarrus County 6,10 5.9 (3.9, 8.5) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Forsyth County 6,10 5.7 (4.2, 7.4) 11 2008-2012
*
*
Orange County 6,10 5.6 (3.3, 8.9) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Pitt County 6,10 5.4 (3.4, 8.2) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Wake County 6,10 5.4 (4.5, 6.5) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend 15.8 (-20.6, 68.9)
Alamance County 6,10 5.4 (3.3, 8.2) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Iredell County 6,10 5.2 (3.2, 7.9) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Henderson County 6,10 5.0 (2.6, 8.6) 3 2008-2012
*
*
Alexander County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Alleghany County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Anson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Ashe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Avery County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Beaufort County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Bertie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Bladen County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Caldwell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Camden County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Carteret County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Caswell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Chatham County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Cherokee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Chowan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Clay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Columbus County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Craven County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Currituck County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Dare County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Davie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Franklin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Gates County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Graham County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Granville County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Greene County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Haywood County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Hertford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Hoke County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Hyde County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Jackson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Jones County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Lee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Lincoln County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Macon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Madison County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Martin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
McDowell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Mitchell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Montgomery County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Northampton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Pamlico County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Pasquotank County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Pender County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Perquimans County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Person County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Polk County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Rutherford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Scotland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Stanly County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Stokes County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Swain County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Transylvania County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Tyrrell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Warren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Washington County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Watauga County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Wilkes County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Wilson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Yadkin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Yancey County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/31/2015 4:49 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top