Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Ovary, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
North Carolina 6,10 11.5 (11.1, 11.9) 644 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.1, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 11.8 (11.8, 11.9) 21,341 § falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.8)
Alamance County 6,10 12.5 (9.5, 16.2) 12
*
*
Alexander County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaufort County 6,10 11.5 (6.6, 18.8) 4
*
*
Bertie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brunswick County 6,10 14.0 (10.2, 18.8) 11
*
*
Buncombe County 6,10 14.0 (11.5, 17.0) 23 stable stable trend 7.0 (-4.7, 20.0)
Burke County 6,10 15.4 (11.3, 20.7) 10
*
*
Cabarrus County 6,10 10.2 (7.5, 13.5) 10
*
*
Caldwell County 6,10 12.3 (8.3, 17.6) 6
*
*
Camden County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carteret County 6,10 14.1 (9.5, 20.5) 7
*
*
Caswell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Catawba County 6,10 12.4 (9.3, 16.3) 11
*
*
Chatham County 6,10 10.4 (6.6, 15.8) 5
*
*
Cherokee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleveland County 6,10 12.6 (8.9, 17.4) 8
*
*
Columbus County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craven County 6,10 10.6 (7.1, 15.2) 6
*
*
Cumberland County 6,10 10.7 (8.5, 13.3) 17 stable stable trend -5.7 (-33.0, 32.7)
Currituck County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davidson County 6,10 8.4 (6.1, 11.4) 9
*
*
Davie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duplin County 6,10 10.5 (6.2, 16.7) 4
*
*
Durham County 6,10 12.7 (10.2, 15.7) 18 stable stable trend -10.9 (-27.3, 9.2)
Edgecombe County 6,10 8.0 (4.5, 13.3) 3
*
*
Forsyth County 6,10 11.7 (9.7, 14.0) 24 stable stable trend 0.4 (-7.0, 8.4)
Franklin County 6,10 14.4 (9.3, 21.6) 5
*
*
Gaston County 6,10 9.1 (6.8, 11.9) 11
*
*
Gates County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Granville County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Guilford County 6,10 10.3 (8.6, 12.1) 30 stable stable trend -5.5 (-13.7, 3.5)
Halifax County 6,10 8.3 (4.5, 14.1) 3
*
*
Harnett County 6,10 13.6 (9.7, 18.5) 8
*
*
Haywood County 6,10 8.2 (4.7, 13.6) 4
*
*
Henderson County 6,10 16.5 (12.8, 21.2) 15 stable stable trend -12.1 (-35.9, 20.6)
Hertford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iredell County 6,10 12.0 (9.0, 15.8) 11
*
*
Jackson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County 6,10 10.6 (7.7, 14.1) 9
*
*
Jones County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 6,10 9.8 (5.5, 16.0) 3
*
*
Lenoir County 6,10 13.4 (8.9, 19.6) 6
*
*
Lincoln County 6,10 11.0 (7.1, 16.4) 5
*
*
Macon County 6,10 18.2 (11.3, 28.5) 5
*
*
Madison County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County 6,10 16.1 (10.4, 24.3) 5
*
*
Mecklenburg County 6,10 11.1 (9.7, 12.6) 49 stable stable trend -6.0 (-22.8, 14.6)
Mitchell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 6,10 9.4 (6.5, 13.5) 7
*
*
Nash County 6,10 8.7 (5.6, 12.9) 5
*
*
New Hanover County 6,10 12.7 (10.0, 16.0) 15 stable stable trend 1.5 (-12.6, 17.9)
Northampton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Onslow County 6,10 12.0 (8.6, 16.4) 8
*
*
Orange County 6,10 14.2 (10.4, 19.1) 9
*
*
Pamlico County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pender County 6,10 14.6 (9.2, 22.2) 5
*
*
Perquimans County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Person County 6,10 21.3 (14.1, 31.3) 6
*
*
Pitt County 6,10 12.9 (9.6, 16.9) 11
*
*
Polk County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 6,10 10.9 (8.0, 14.7) 9
*
*
Richmond County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robeson County 6,10 11.7 (8.3, 15.9) 8
*
*
Rockingham County 6,10 13.5 (9.5, 18.7) 8
*
*
Rowan County 6,10 13.0 (9.8, 17.0) 11
*
*
Rutherford County 6,10 15.3 (10.6, 21.5) 7
*
*
Sampson County 6,10 13.0 (8.3, 19.5) 5
*
*
Scotland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanly County 6,10 8.7 (5.1, 14.1) 4
*
*
Stokes County 6,10 16.7 (10.8, 24.8) 5
*
*
Surry County 6,10 12.0 (8.0, 17.5) 6
*
*
Swain County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Transylvania County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 6,10 10.6 (7.8, 14.0) 10
*
*
Vance County 6,10 11.0 (6.2, 18.2) 3
*
*
Wake County 6,10 12.0 (10.6, 13.6) 51 stable stable trend 1.8 (-13.1, 19.2)
Warren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County 6,10 17.2 (10.4, 26.9) 4
*
*
Wayne County 6,10 12.3 (8.9, 16.6) 9
*
*
Wilkes County 6,10 7.5 (4.5, 12.1) 4
*
*
Wilson County 6,10 6.9 (4.0, 11.3) 3
*
*
Yadkin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/26/2016 10:33 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top