Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Ovary, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent AAPC
sort sort by trenddescending
North Carolina 6,10 11.7 (11.3, 12.1) 641 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.8, 1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 12.0 (12.0, 12.1) 21,341 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.7)
Alamance County 6,10 12.8 (9.8, 16.6) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend 9.8 (-16.9, 45.1)
Alexander County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Alleghany County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Anson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Ashe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Avery County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Beaufort County 6,10 11.3 (6.4, 18.5) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.7 (-58.1, 157.0)
Bertie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Bladen County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Brunswick County 6,10 11.4 (8.0, 16.0) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.6 (-48.1, 64.6)
Buncombe County 6,10 13.6 (11.1, 16.6) 21 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.9 (-7.4, 14.4)
Burke County 6,10 15.7 (11.4, 21.1) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.6 (-31.9, 30.9)
Cabarrus County 6,10 11.0 (8.2, 14.5) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.3 (-28.5, 25.4)
Caldwell County 6,10 11.2 (7.4, 16.5) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.3 (-24.6, 21.4)
Camden County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Carteret County 6,10 13.6 (9.1, 19.8) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.1 (-26.3, 19.5)
Caswell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Catawba County 6,10 13.1 (9.9, 17.0) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.8 (-33.8, 48.6)
Chatham County 6,10 9.6 (5.8, 15.1) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -34.1 (-80.1, 118.6)
Cherokee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (0.0, 0.0)
Chowan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Clay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Cleveland County 6,10 13.3 (9.6, 18.2) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -14 (-47.4, 40.8)
Columbus County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Craven County 6,10 9.6 (6.4, 13.9) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.4 (-33.2, 50.9)
Cumberland County 6,10 10.6 (8.4, 13.2) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend -16.9 (-34.7, 5.8)
Currituck County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Dare County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Davidson County 6,10 9.8 (7.3, 13.0) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.7 (-25.9, 53.6)
Davie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Duplin County 6,10 11.6 (7.0, 18.1) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.5 (-49.4, 54.9)
Durham County 6,10 13.1 (10.4, 16.2) 17 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.4 (-25.9, 25.9)
Edgecombe County 6,10 8.7 (4.9, 14.4) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.2 (-45.5, 79.1)
Forsyth County 6,10 12.0 (9.9, 14.4) 25 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.4 (-9.3, 7.2)
Franklin County 6,10 15.6 (10.1, 23.0) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8 (-48.8, 65.2)
Gaston County 6,10 8.5 (6.3, 11.2) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.9 (-9.7, 2.3)
Gates County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Graham County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Granville County 6,10 10.7 (6.2, 17.4) 3 2007-2011 falling falling trend -29.2 (-45.5, -8.2)
Greene County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Guilford County 6,10 11.5 (9.8, 13.5) 33 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.8 (-20.6, 2.4)
Halifax County 6,10 8.5 (4.7, 14.4) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 30.8 (-31.7, 150.5)
Harnett County 6,10 12.0 (8.4, 16.8) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7 (-40.9, 46.2)
Haywood County 6,10 7.9 (4.5, 13.2) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.7 (-53.7, 91.8)
Henderson County 6,10 17.0 (13.0, 21.9) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.6 (-36.2, 36.8)
Hertford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Hoke County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Hyde County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Iredell County 6,10 13.0 (9.8, 16.9) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.4 (-21.2, 20.8)
Jackson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Johnston County 6,10 11.1 (8.1, 14.8) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.7 (-39.0, 42.7)
Jones County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.9 (-44.5, 52.9)
Lenoir County 6,10 14.1 (9.5, 20.3) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.5 (-30.0, 44.4)
Lincoln County 6,10 11.6 (7.6, 17.1) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 11.6 (-27.4, 71.5)
Macon County 6,10 18.9 (11.9, 29.3) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -16 (-41.3, 20.2)
Madison County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Martin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
McDowell County 6,10 11.9 (7.1, 19.3) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.4 (-47.0, 65.4)
Mecklenburg County 6,10 11.6 (10.1, 13.1) 49 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.4 (-20.9, 17.9)
Mitchell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Montgomery County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Moore County 6,10 10.7 (7.5, 15.0) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.2 (-30.0, 46.3)
Nash County 6,10 10.5 (7.1, 14.9) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.1 (-20.0, 27.8)
New Hanover County 6,10 13.6 (10.7, 17.0) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.4 (-23.7, 10.1)
Northampton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Onslow County 6,10 11.5 (8.2, 15.8) 8 2007-2011 falling falling trend -21.4 (-36.9, -2.1)
Orange County 6,10 12.9 (9.2, 17.5) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.2 (-29.9, 54.9)
Pamlico County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Pasquotank County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Pender County 6,10 8.9 (5.0, 15.0) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -15.6 (-55.7, 60.9)
Perquimans County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Person County 6,10 20.4 (13.3, 30.1) 5 2007-2011 rising rising trend 44.5 (6.9, 95.3)
Pitt County 6,10 13.0 (9.7, 17.1) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.3 (-28.3, 17.3)
Polk County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Randolph County 6,10 11.7 (8.6, 15.5) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.6 (-11.3, 28.2)
Richmond County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend 7.7 (-42.4, 101.1)
Robeson County 6,10 11.9 (8.5, 16.2) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.3 (-27.0, 54.7)
Rockingham County 6,10 14.1 (10.0, 19.3) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3 (-20.2, 33.0)
Rowan County 6,10 13.2 (9.9, 17.3) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.1 (-35.3, 80.7)
Rutherford County 6,10 14.5 (10.0, 20.5) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.2 (-40.4, 63.9)
Sampson County 6,10 9.1 (5.4, 14.6) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.8 (-54.9, 134.1)
Scotland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Stanly County 6,10 8.5 (4.9, 14.0) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 19.4 (-52.4, 199.4)
Stokes County 6,10 16.2 (10.6, 24.0) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 17.7 (-14.7, 62.4)
Surry County 6,10 12.2 (8.1, 17.8) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.3 (-39.0, 78.1)
Swain County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Transylvania County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Tyrrell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Union County 6,10 10.3 (7.6, 13.7) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.5 (-20.6, 17.3)
Vance County 6,10 12.9 (7.6, 20.8) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 15.9 (-20.0, 67.9)
Wake County 6,10 12.2 (10.7, 13.8) 50 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.5 (-19.7, 8.8)
Warren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Washington County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Watauga County 6,10 19.3 (12.1, 29.4) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.9 (-57.8, 123.1)
Wayne County 6,10 11.2 (8.0, 15.3) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 16.1 (-11.1, 51.7)
Wilkes County 6,10 9.1 (5.7, 14.1) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.1 (-51.8, 63.8)
Wilson County 6,10 8.1 (4.9, 12.7) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11 (-46.3, 47.7)
Yadkin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Yancey County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/23/2014 7:42 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are EAPCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top