Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Dakota by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Cervix, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countascending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
North Dakota 6,10 6.6 (5.4, 8.0) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.5 (-26.7, 14.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 7.7 (7.6, 7.8) 12,476 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -0.9)
Cass County 6,10 6.8 (4.3, 10.2) 5 2008-2012 * *
Adams County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Barnes County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Benson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Billings County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Bottineau County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Bowman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Burke County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Burleigh County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Cavalier County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Dickey County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Divide County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Dunn County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Eddy County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Emmons County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Foster County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Golden Valley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Grand Forks County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Grant County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Griggs County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Hettinger County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Kidder County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
LaMoure County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Logan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
McHenry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
McIntosh County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
McKenzie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
McLean County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Mercer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Morton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Mountrail County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Nelson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Oliver County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Pembina County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Pierce County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ramsey County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ransom County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Renville County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Richland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Rolette County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Sargent County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Sheridan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Sioux County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Slope County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Stark County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Steele County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Stutsman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Towner County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Traill County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Walsh County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ward County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wells County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Williams County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/01/2015 1:45 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top