Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Melanoma of the Skin, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Ohio 6,10 17.0 (16.5, 17.5) 1,110 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.6, 2.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 15.9 (15.8, 16.0) 27,524 § stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Franklin County 6,10 17.6 (16.1, 19.2) 106 stable stable trend -6.5 (-15.4, 3.3)
Cuyahoga County 6,10 12.9 (11.8, 14.1) 104 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.8)
Hamilton County 6,10 14.9 (13.3, 16.6) 69 stable stable trend 9.6 (-1.4, 21.7)
Montgomery County 6,10 17.2 (15.1, 19.4) 56 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.4, 5.8)
Summit County 6,10 16.7 (14.7, 18.9) 53 stable stable trend 0.5 (-15.4, 19.3)
Stark County 6,10 20.1 (17.4, 23.0) 45 stable stable trend -10.1 (-23.4, 5.5)
Butler County 6,10 15.8 (13.4, 18.6) 31 stable stable trend 2.2 (-8.2, 13.8)
Lorain County 6,10 16.8 (14.1, 19.9) 30 stable stable trend -6.4 (-23.0, 13.9)
Lucas County 6,10 11.8 (9.9, 13.9) 30 stable stable trend -20.7 (-41.6, 7.6)
Warren County 6,10 22.0 (18.3, 26.3) 25 stable stable trend 10.7 (-2.1, 25.1)
Lake County 6,10 18.7 (15.4, 22.5) 24 rising rising trend 23.3 (1.6, 49.7)
Delaware County 6,10 25.5 (20.9, 30.8) 22 stable stable trend -7.8 (-24.7, 12.9)
Greene County 6,10 23.6 (19.2, 28.7) 21 stable stable trend 7.2 (-18.1, 40.4)
Clermont County 6,10 19.2 (15.6, 23.4) 20 stable stable trend -7.5 (-18.9, 5.5)
Licking County 6,10 21.8 (17.6, 26.6) 20 falling falling trend -10.1 (-18.1, -1.3)
Portage County 6,10 21.9 (17.7, 26.9) 20 stable stable trend 9.4 (-32.0, 75.9)
Trumbull County 6,10 14.9 (11.9, 18.4) 19 stable stable trend -10.1 (-24.9, 7.7)
Medina County 6,10 19.6 (15.7, 24.3) 18 stable stable trend -4.1 (-31.1, 33.5)
Clark County 6,10 21.9 (17.3, 27.4) 17 stable stable trend -4.2 (-19.4, 13.9)
Fairfield County 6,10 21.7 (17.3, 26.8) 17 stable stable trend -21.8 (-44.1, 9.3)
Miami County 6,10 25.0 (19.4, 31.7) 15 stable stable trend -5.2 (-35.2, 38.7)
Mahoning County 6,10 9.5 (7.3, 12.2) 14
*
*
Ashtabula County 6,10 23.3 (18.0, 29.8) 14
*
*
Muskingum County 6,10 26.1 (19.8, 33.8) 12
*
*
Geauga County 6,10 24.1 (18.1, 31.5) 12
*
*
Wood County 6,10 17.4 (13.1, 22.6) 12
*
*
Wayne County 6,10 16.6 (12.3, 21.9) 11
*
*
Erie County 6,10 22.7 (16.6, 30.3) 10
*
*
Richland County 6,10 13.3 (9.7, 17.8) 10
*
*
Union County 6,10 34.0 (24.8, 45.5) 9
*
*
Tuscarawas County 6,10 16.1 (11.5, 21.9) 9
*
*
Allen County 6,10 14.4 (10.3, 19.7) 9
*
*
Scioto County 6,10 16.4 (11.6, 22.5) 8
*
*
Ross County 6,10 18.3 (12.8, 25.5) 7
*
*
Columbiana County 6,10 11.5 (7.8, 16.4) 7
*
*
Marion County 6,10 20.9 (14.3, 29.4) 7
*
*
Hancock County 6,10 17.5 (12.0, 24.7) 7
*
*
Auglaize County 6,10 26.1 (17.6, 37.1) 7
*
*
Jefferson County 6,10 14.6 (9.8, 21.0) 7
*
*
Crawford County 6,10 25.0 (16.7, 35.9) 6
*
*
Washington County 6,10 17.9 (12.0, 25.7) 6
*
*
Guernsey County 6,10 29.7 (19.7, 42.7) 6
*
*
Athens County 6,10 20.3 (13.4, 29.7) 6
*
*
Huron County 6,10 16.8 (11.1, 24.3) 6
*
*
Ashland County 6,10 19.0 (12.3, 27.8) 6
*
*
Darke County 6,10 18.3 (12.0, 26.9) 6
*
*
Preble County 6,10 21.3 (13.9, 31.3) 6
*
*
Knox County 6,10 17.5 (11.3, 25.8) 5
*
*
Lawrence County 6,10 14.5 (9.4, 21.5) 5
*
*
Pickaway County 6,10 17.3 (11.1, 25.9) 5
*
*
Shelby County 6,10 19.5 (12.5, 29.0) 5
*
*
Champaign County 6,10 22.3 (14.1, 33.6) 5
*
*
Clinton County 6,10 18.8 (12.0, 28.3) 5
*
*
Putnam County 6,10 30.3 (19.2, 45.3) 5
*
*
Sandusky County 6,10 15.1 (9.5, 22.8) 5
*
*
Belmont County 6,10 11.0 (6.5, 17.4) 4
*
*
Fayette County 6,10 27.9 (16.9, 43.3) 4
*
*
Gallia County 6,10 23.5 (14.0, 37.0) 4
*
*
Seneca County 6,10 11.8 (7.1, 18.5) 4
*
*
Mercer County 6,10 18.2 (10.5, 29.2) 4
*
*
Defiance County 6,10 17.8 (10.3, 28.6) 4
*
*
Coshocton County 6,10 17.4 (9.9, 28.2) 3
*
*
Fulton County 6,10 14.9 (8.5, 24.1) 3
*
*
Holmes County 6,10 19.2 (11.1, 30.6) 3
*
*
Logan County 6,10 12.9 (7.4, 21.0) 3
*
*
Morrow County 6,10 18.9 (10.8, 30.6) 3
*
*
Williams County 6,10 15.5 (8.7, 25.5) 3
*
*
Carroll County 6,10 15.0 (8.5, 25.2) 3
*
*
Madison County 6,10 13.7 (7.7, 22.7) 3
*
*
Ottawa County 6,10 14.6 (7.9, 24.6) 3
*
*
Adams County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Highland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hocking County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Wert County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/30/2016 1:15 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top