Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Melanoma of the Skin, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Ohio 6,10 17.0 (16.5, 17.5) 1,110 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.6, 2.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 15.9 (15.8, 16.0) 27,524 § stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Union County 6,10 34.0 (24.8, 45.5) 9
*
*
Putnam County 6,10 30.3 (19.2, 45.3) 5
*
*
Guernsey County 6,10 29.7 (19.7, 42.7) 6
*
*
Fayette County 6,10 27.9 (16.9, 43.3) 4
*
*
Muskingum County 6,10 26.1 (19.8, 33.8) 12
*
*
Auglaize County 6,10 26.1 (17.6, 37.1) 7
*
*
Delaware County 6,10 25.5 (20.9, 30.8) 22 stable stable trend -7.8 (-24.7, 12.9)
Miami County 6,10 25.0 (19.4, 31.7) 15 stable stable trend -5.2 (-35.2, 38.7)
Crawford County 6,10 25.0 (16.7, 35.9) 6
*
*
Geauga County 6,10 24.1 (18.1, 31.5) 12
*
*
Greene County 6,10 23.6 (19.2, 28.7) 21 stable stable trend 7.2 (-18.1, 40.4)
Gallia County 6,10 23.5 (14.0, 37.0) 4
*
*
Ashtabula County 6,10 23.3 (18.0, 29.8) 14
*
*
Erie County 6,10 22.7 (16.6, 30.3) 10
*
*
Champaign County 6,10 22.3 (14.1, 33.6) 5
*
*
Warren County 6,10 22.0 (18.3, 26.3) 25 stable stable trend 10.7 (-2.1, 25.1)
Portage County 6,10 21.9 (17.7, 26.9) 20 stable stable trend 9.4 (-32.0, 75.9)
Clark County 6,10 21.9 (17.3, 27.4) 17 stable stable trend -4.2 (-19.4, 13.9)
Licking County 6,10 21.8 (17.6, 26.6) 20 falling falling trend -10.1 (-18.1, -1.3)
Fairfield County 6,10 21.7 (17.3, 26.8) 17 stable stable trend -21.8 (-44.1, 9.3)
Preble County 6,10 21.3 (13.9, 31.3) 6
*
*
Marion County 6,10 20.9 (14.3, 29.4) 7
*
*
Athens County 6,10 20.3 (13.4, 29.7) 6
*
*
Stark County 6,10 20.1 (17.4, 23.0) 45 stable stable trend -10.1 (-23.4, 5.5)
Medina County 6,10 19.6 (15.7, 24.3) 18 stable stable trend -4.1 (-31.1, 33.5)
Shelby County 6,10 19.5 (12.5, 29.0) 5
*
*
Clermont County 6,10 19.2 (15.6, 23.4) 20 stable stable trend -7.5 (-18.9, 5.5)
Holmes County 6,10 19.2 (11.1, 30.6) 3
*
*
Ashland County 6,10 19.0 (12.3, 27.8) 6
*
*
Morrow County 6,10 18.9 (10.8, 30.6) 3
*
*
Clinton County 6,10 18.8 (12.0, 28.3) 5
*
*
Lake County 6,10 18.7 (15.4, 22.5) 24 rising rising trend 23.3 (1.6, 49.7)
Darke County 6,10 18.3 (12.0, 26.9) 6
*
*
Ross County 6,10 18.3 (12.8, 25.5) 7
*
*
Mercer County 6,10 18.2 (10.5, 29.2) 4
*
*
Washington County 6,10 17.9 (12.0, 25.7) 6
*
*
Defiance County 6,10 17.8 (10.3, 28.6) 4
*
*
Franklin County 6,10 17.6 (16.1, 19.2) 106 stable stable trend -6.5 (-15.4, 3.3)
Hancock County 6,10 17.5 (12.0, 24.7) 7
*
*
Knox County 6,10 17.5 (11.3, 25.8) 5
*
*
Coshocton County 6,10 17.4 (9.9, 28.2) 3
*
*
Wood County 6,10 17.4 (13.1, 22.6) 12
*
*
Pickaway County 6,10 17.3 (11.1, 25.9) 5
*
*
Montgomery County 6,10 17.2 (15.1, 19.4) 56 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.4, 5.8)
Lorain County 6,10 16.8 (14.1, 19.9) 30 stable stable trend -6.4 (-23.0, 13.9)
Huron County 6,10 16.8 (11.1, 24.3) 6
*
*
Summit County 6,10 16.7 (14.7, 18.9) 53 stable stable trend 0.5 (-15.4, 19.3)
Wayne County 6,10 16.6 (12.3, 21.9) 11
*
*
Scioto County 6,10 16.4 (11.6, 22.5) 8
*
*
Tuscarawas County 6,10 16.1 (11.5, 21.9) 9
*
*
Butler County 6,10 15.8 (13.4, 18.6) 31 stable stable trend 2.2 (-8.2, 13.8)
Williams County 6,10 15.5 (8.7, 25.5) 3
*
*
Sandusky County 6,10 15.1 (9.5, 22.8) 5
*
*
Carroll County 6,10 15.0 (8.5, 25.2) 3
*
*
Trumbull County 6,10 14.9 (11.9, 18.4) 19 stable stable trend -10.1 (-24.9, 7.7)
Fulton County 6,10 14.9 (8.5, 24.1) 3
*
*
Hamilton County 6,10 14.9 (13.3, 16.6) 69 stable stable trend 9.6 (-1.4, 21.7)
Ottawa County 6,10 14.6 (7.9, 24.6) 3
*
*
Jefferson County 6,10 14.6 (9.8, 21.0) 7
*
*
Lawrence County 6,10 14.5 (9.4, 21.5) 5
*
*
Allen County 6,10 14.4 (10.3, 19.7) 9
*
*
Madison County 6,10 13.7 (7.7, 22.7) 3
*
*
Richland County 6,10 13.3 (9.7, 17.8) 10
*
*
Cuyahoga County 6,10 12.9 (11.8, 14.1) 104 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.8)
Logan County 6,10 12.9 (7.4, 21.0) 3
*
*
Seneca County 6,10 11.8 (7.1, 18.5) 4
*
*
Lucas County 6,10 11.8 (9.9, 13.9) 30 stable stable trend -20.7 (-41.6, 7.6)
Columbiana County 6,10 11.5 (7.8, 16.4) 7
*
*
Belmont County 6,10 11.0 (6.5, 17.4) 4
*
*
Mahoning County 6,10 9.5 (7.3, 12.2) 14
*
*
Adams County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Highland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hocking County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Wert County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/24/2016 1:37 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top