Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Ovary, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Ohio 6,10 12.0 (11.7, 12.4) 854 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.1 (-9.3, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 12.0 (12.0, 12.1) 21,341 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.7)
Belmont County 6,10 7.3 (4.5, 11.7) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -14.7 (-43.9, 29.9)
Lorain County 6,10 8.5 (6.7, 10.6) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.9 (-15.8, 0.7)
Lucas County 6,10 9.3 (7.7, 11.1) 25 2007-2011 stable stable trend -14.5 (-43.0, 28.4)
Seneca County 6,10 9.3 (5.5, 15.1) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.8 (-39.9, 35.3)
Clermont County 6,10 9.8 (7.4, 12.8) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.9 (-26.9, 21.0)
Geauga County 6,10 9.9 (6.8, 14.2) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -26 (-68.7, 74.7)
Erie County 6,10 10.4 (6.8, 15.4) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -28.6 (-49.7, 1.3)
Hancock County 6,10 10.4 (6.6, 15.8) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.7 (-39.5, 31.9)
Summit County 6,10 10.5 (9.1, 12.2) 38 2007-2011 falling falling trend -11.9 (-20.7, -2.0)
Crawford County 6,10 10.8 (6.2, 17.9) 3 2007-2011 falling falling trend -22 (-30.8, -12.1)
Greene County 6,10 11.0 (8.2, 14.5) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.2 (-32.0, 13.3)
Fairfield County 6,10 11.2 (8.2, 15.0) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.3 (-24.4, 43.9)
Montgomery County 6,10 11.2 (9.7, 12.9) 39 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.7 (-7.1, 15.8)
Lawrence County 6,10 11.5 (7.3, 17.4) 5 2007-2011 rising rising trend 14.7 (5.4, 24.8)
Columbiana County 6,10 11.5 (8.2, 15.8) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.3 (-28.5, 57.9)
Marion County 6,10 11.7 (7.3, 18.0) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.7 (-39.3, 80.7)
Tuscarawas County 6,10 11.7 (8.0, 16.7) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -25.2 (-46.1, 3.8)
Wayne County 6,10 11.9 (8.5, 16.3) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.6 (-24.7, 13.3)
Sandusky County 6,10 12.0 (7.5, 18.4) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.7 (-29.1, 43.1)
Delaware County 6,10 12.1 (9.0, 15.8) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.5 (-25.9, 33.5)
Licking County 6,10 12.2 (9.3, 15.8) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -15.1 (-38.1, 16.3)
Richland County 6,10 12.2 (8.9, 16.5) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.3 (-17.1, 26.3)
Mahoning County 6,10 12.3 (9.9, 15.2) 20 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.6 (-31.1, 40.6)
Hamilton County 6,10 12.5 (11.1, 14.0) 61 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.5 (-11.3, 20.7)
Medina County 6,10 12.5 (9.6, 16.0) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.6 (-33.1, 27.5)
Stark County 6,10 12.6 (10.6, 14.8) 32 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.7 (-16.4, 4.2)
Pickaway County 6,10 12.6 (7.5, 20.0) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.7 (-31.1, 65.2)
Preble County 6,10 12.6 (7.3, 20.6) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -13.1 (-53.2, 61.5)
Trumbull County 6,10 12.7 (10.2, 15.6) 19 2007-2011 stable stable trend -13.8 (-35.0, 14.3)
Miami County 6,10 12.7 (8.9, 17.5) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.3 (-8.0, 32.2)
Portage County 6,10 12.7 (9.6, 16.5) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.7 (-28.7, 11.8)
Scioto County 6,10 12.7 (8.8, 18.0) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1 (-35.2, 51.4)
Allen County 6,10 12.9 (9.2, 17.6) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.7 (-15.5, 9.8)
Butler County 6,10 12.9 (10.8, 15.4) 26 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.8 (-32.3, 28.2)
Wood County 6,10 12.9 (9.3, 17.6) 9 2007-2011 falling falling trend -30.7 (-50.4, -3.3)
Guernsey County 6,10 12.9 (7.4, 21.2) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.3 (-44.7, 48.7)
Huron County 6,10 13.0 (8.2, 19.6) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.1 (-31.4, 36.8)
Franklin County 6,10 13.0 (11.7, 14.4) 77 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.6 (-17.0, 9.7)
Lake County 6,10 13.1 (10.6, 16.1) 20 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.4 (-8.1, 27.8)
Cuyahoga County 6,10 13.1 (12.0, 14.3) 111 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.5 (-10.8, 13.2)
Washington County 6,10 13.3 (8.7, 19.7) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 15.4 (-19.5, 65.6)
Muskingum County 6,10 13.4 (9.4, 18.6) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.4 (-34.4, 39.3)
Auglaize County 6,10 13.5 (8.1, 21.3) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 15.3 (-17.9, 62.0)
Ashtabula County 6,10 13.7 (9.9, 18.6) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5 (-34.3, 37.5)
Clinton County 6,10 13.8 (8.0, 22.3) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (0.0, 0.0)
Clark County 6,10 13.9 (10.6, 17.9) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8 (-29.3, 19.7)
Warren County 6,10 14.1 (11.1, 17.7) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.4 (-19.7, 4.4)
Ross County 6,10 14.2 (9.6, 20.4) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 14.3 (-22.6, 68.9)
Jefferson County 6,10 14.2 (9.8, 20.1) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.4 (-32.9, 59.4)
Champaign County 6,10 14.7 (8.4, 23.9) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 17.1 (-16.5, 64.3)
Knox County 6,10 14.8 (9.7, 21.7) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.6 (-15.9, 32.5)
Mercer County 6,10 15.0 (8.9, 23.8) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -13.9 (-44.6, 33.7)
Putnam County 6,10 15.6 (8.8, 25.7) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.3 (-14.3, 16.0)
Ashland County 6,10 15.8 (10.2, 23.5) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -16.6 (-34.5, 6.1)
Gallia County 6,10 16.6 (9.3, 27.5) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.1 (-32.7, 80.3)
Fayette County 6,10 16.7 (9.5, 27.7) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 15.9 (-55.6, 202.4)
Hardin County 6,10 16.7 (9.5, 27.5) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 32.1 (-43.3, 207.6)
Coshocton County 6,10 16.8 (10.5, 25.9) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.7 (-33.7, 84.9)
Adams County 6,10 20.6 (11.6, 33.8) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 12.9 (-27.7, 76.3)
Athens County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend -17.8 (-53.8, 46.2)
Brown County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Carroll County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Darke County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.8 (-57.9, 101.9)
Defiance County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Fulton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Harrison County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Henry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Highland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Hocking County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Holmes County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jackson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Logan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Madison County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Meigs County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Monroe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Morgan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Morrow County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Noble County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Ottawa County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Paulding County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Perry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Pike County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Shelby County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Union County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Van Wert County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Vinton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Williams County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Wyandot County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/23/2014 7:13 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top