Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Cancer Sites, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent AAPC
sort sort by trenddescending
Oklahoma 6,10 461.1 (458.1, 464.1) 18,658 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 459.8 (459.4, 460.1) 1,514,446 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Oklahoma County 6,10 459.7 (452.6, 466.9) 3,303 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2 (-4.3, 0.4)
Tulsa County 6,10 484.9 (477.0, 492.9) 2,949 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3 (-5.6, -0.3)
Cleveland County 6,10 474.4 (461.5, 487.5) 1,085 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.6, -1.0)
Canadian County 6,10 479.0 (460.5, 498.1) 527 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.3, 5.5)
Comanche County 6,10 425.4 (408.0, 443.4) 458 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.2 (-7.4, 7.5)
Rogers County 6,10 473.3 (453.5, 493.8) 444 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.9 (-7.6, 0.0)
Creek County 6,10 512.2 (490.3, 534.8) 426 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.6 (-9.1, 0.1)
Muskogee County 6,10 491.2 (469.7, 513.4) 404 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.4 (-11.7, 3.6)
Pottawatomie County 6,10 467.8 (446.2, 490.1) 362 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.9, 1.4)
Wagoner County 6,10 436.8 (415.5, 459.0) 338 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.7 (-13.8, 7.7)
Washington County 6,10 488.1 (464.1, 513.0) 328 2007-2011 falling falling trend -5.1 (-6.8, -3.3)
Garfield County 6,10 463.6 (441.1, 487.1) 327 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5 (-11.9, 2.4)
Payne County 6,10 456.2 (432.9, 480.4) 295 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.1 (-15.5, 6.6)
Kay County 6,10 462.1 (437.1, 488.3) 269 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.8, 1.6)
Stephens County 6,10 451.7 (427.1, 477.4) 262 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.3, 1.4)
Carter County 6,10 469.5 (444.1, 496.0) 261 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.6, 4.9)
Pittsburg County 6,10 429.6 (405.8, 454.5) 254 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.1 (-9.8, 1.9)
Osage County 6,10 409.2 (385.9, 433.7) 241 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5 (-10.1, 0.3)
Okmulgee County 6,10 494.3 (466.0, 524.0) 235 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.6, 6.6)
Delaware County 6,10 403.7 (379.7, 428.9) 235 2007-2011 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.8, 3.9)
Grady County 6,10 398.1 (374.9, 422.3) 229 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.8 (-10.6, 5.6)
Le Flore County 6,10 384.0 (361.6, 407.4) 229 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.9 (-26.9, 6.2)
Cherokee County 6,10 449.5 (423.0, 477.1) 224 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.2 (-12.6, 5.1)
Mayes County 6,10 440.8 (414.7, 468.2) 221 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.9 (-10.8, 7.8)
Bryan County 6,10 420.5 (394.8, 447.5) 207 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.8 (-13.8, 0.7)
Pontotoc County 6,10 478.0 (448.6, 508.8) 203 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.9 (-8.0, 6.7)
Logan County 6,10 450.0 (422.1, 479.4) 201 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4 (-8.9, 1.2)
Sequoyah County 6,10 409.8 (384.3, 436.6) 200 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.9 (-16.3, 1.4)
McClain County 6,10 530.9 (497.4, 566.2) 196 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.1 (-8.3, 4.5)
McCurtain County 6,10 463.3 (433.2, 494.9) 184 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.8 (-22.6, 2.7)
Garvin County 6,10 507.6 (474.0, 543.1) 176 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.8 (-16.1, 3.6)
Ottawa County 6,10 434.3 (405.4, 464.8) 175 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7 (-18.7, 6.4)
Lincoln County 6,10 395.8 (368.3, 424.9) 161 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.2, 4.0)
Seminole County 6,10 491.3 (456.5, 528.2) 153 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.2 (-7.6, 8.7)
McIntosh County 6,10 490.8 (454.5, 529.5) 151 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.9 (-12.6, 1.3)
Caddo County 6,10 442.1 (410.4, 475.7) 147 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.8 (-15.5, 11.7)
Jackson County 6,10 471.8 (435.6, 510.2) 128 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.9 (-13.7, 2.6)
Custer County 6,10 432.3 (398.1, 468.6) 122 2007-2011 rising rising trend 4.8 (0.5, 9.4)
Adair County 6,10 432.5 (395.4, 472.2) 104 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.6 (-14.2, 20.3)
Beckham County 6,10 424.1 (387.2, 463.5) 99 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.5 (-15.5, 17.2)
Craig County 6,10 511.1 (466.2, 559.5) 98 2007-2011 falling falling trend -10.4 (-19.4, -0.4)
Marshall County 6,10 441.9 (401.7, 485.4) 95 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1 (-14.0, 13.9)
Hughes County 6,10 509.3 (462.8, 559.6) 91 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.2 (-4.2, 9.1)
Choctaw County 6,10 434.7 (393.9, 478.9) 88 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.9 (-12.8, 1.7)
Pawnee County 6,10 408.2 (370.0, 449.6) 87 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.9 (-14.8, 6.1)
Woodward County 6,10 385.2 (349.4, 423.6) 87 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.8 (-15.6, 0.8)
Murray County 6,10 480.7 (434.8, 530.3) 84 2007-2011 falling falling trend -7.5 (-13.0, -1.7)
Kingfisher County 6,10 460.5 (416.1, 508.6) 80 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.1 (-10.1, 4.4)
Atoka County 6,10 456.5 (411.4, 505.4) 78 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.8, 7.0)
Haskell County 6,10 472.3 (424.1, 524.7) 75 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.7 (-17.1, 5.0)
Okfuskee County 6,10 461.4 (413.7, 513.4) 70 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.0, -1.1)
Noble County 6,10 476.1 (426.7, 529.8) 70 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.9 (-13.3, 13.3)
Pushmataha County 6,10 411.1 (366.8, 459.8) 68 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.4 (-22.9, 1.8)
Texas County 6,10 370.1 (331.2, 412.4) 67 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9 (-25.2, 10.7)
Washita County 6,10 452.3 (404.3, 504.8) 67 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.9 (-14.7, 10.5)
Blaine County 6,10 495.4 (442.6, 552.9) 66 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.4 (-15.7, 19.5)
Kiowa County 6,10 492.6 (438.0, 552.7) 62 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.3 (-16.1, 2.5)
Johnston County 6,10 454.5 (404.1, 509.8) 61 2007-2011 falling falling trend -12.2 (-18.4, -5.5)
Nowata County 6,10 424.3 (376.3, 477.1) 59 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.8 (-24.4, 14.8)
Love County 6,10 475.7 (420.1, 537.1) 56 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7 (-17.9, 5.3)
Latimer County 6,10 383.1 (337.2, 433.8) 53 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.8 (-18.9, 7.1)
Major County 6,10 479.8 (420.8, 545.5) 51 2007-2011 stable stable trend 9.4 (-9.4, 32.1)
Woods County 6,10 467.5 (409.4, 531.9) 50 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.3 (-10.0, 1.8)
Jefferson County 6,10 484.8 (420.7, 556.8) 43 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1 (-19.7, 22.1)
Tillman County 6,10 406.8 (353.2, 466.8) 43 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.6 (-20.2, 9.5)
Alfalfa County 6,10 464.0 (397.0, 540.2) 37 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.1 (-19.1, 13.7)
Greer County 6,10 462.1 (396.5, 536.1) 37 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.3 (-30.1, 15.3)
Dewey County 6,10 474.6 (400.7, 559.3) 32 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.1 (-19.9, 30.2)
Grant County 6,10 453.5 (383.0, 535.1) 31 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.9 (-5.4, 14.1)
Cotton County 6,10 378.0 (318.9, 445.7) 30 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.7 (-25.5, 29.8)
Coal County 6,10 391.6 (329.4, 462.8) 30 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.6 (-29.3, 18.2)
Ellis County 6,10 439.2 (362.0, 529.5) 25 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.4 (-19.8, 33.4)
Beaver County 6,10 347.3 (286.0, 418.5) 24 2007-2011 stable stable trend 11.2 (-10.1, 37.4)
Harper County 6,10 426.9 (348.2, 519.6) 21 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.2 (-9.4, 29.2)
Roger Mills County 6,10 357.6 (286.4, 442.9) 18 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.9 (-24.4, 5.0)
Cimarron County 6,10 417.8 (325.0, 531.6) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.1 (-27.0, 23.3)
Harmon County 6,10 422.1 (329.1, 534.3) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.3 (-20.9, 15.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/23/2014 1:52 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are EAPCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top