Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Colon & Rectum, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Oklahoma 6,10 38.8 (37.6, 40.0) 867 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.2, 2.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 36.6 (36.5, 36.7) 67,886 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.4, -3.2)
Lincoln County 6,10 25.9 (17.2, 37.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
Osage County 6,10 31.6 (23.2, 42.2) 10 2008-2012 * *
Wagoner County 6,10 31.8 (24.2, 40.9) 13 2008-2012 * *
Beckham County 6,10 31.9 (19.6, 49.5) 4 2008-2012 * *
Seminole County 6,10 32.4 (21.3, 47.7) 6 2008-2012 * *
Cherokee County 6,10 32.9 (23.8, 44.5) 9 2008-2012 * *
Carter County 6,10 33.0 (24.6, 43.5) 11 2008-2012 * *
Pawnee County 6,10 33.4 (19.8, 53.5) 4 2008-2012 * *
Custer County 6,10 33.7 (21.8, 50.0) 5 2008-2012 * *
Le Flore County 6,10 34.4 (25.8, 45.1) 11 2008-2012 * *
Grady County 6,10 34.8 (26.3, 45.4) 11 2008-2012 * *
Logan County 6,10 35.2 (25.3, 47.8) 9 2008-2012 * *
Atoka County 6,10 35.2 (20.0, 58.5) 3 2008-2012 * *
Murray County 6,10 35.5 (20.3, 58.8) 3 2008-2012 * *
Garfield County 6,10 35.5 (27.6, 45.1) 14 2008-2012 * *
Cleveland County 6,10 36.0 (31.4, 41.2) 44 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.5 (-18.5, 7.3)
Hughes County 6,10 36.1 (20.7, 59.9) 4 2008-2012 * *
Oklahoma County 6,10 36.4 (33.7, 39.1) 147 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.7, 3.6)
Bryan County 6,10 36.7 (27.1, 48.8) 10 2008-2012 * *
Kay County 6,10 37.3 (27.9, 49.0) 12 2008-2012 * *
Adair County 6,10 37.9 (23.9, 57.3) 5 2008-2012 * *
Muskogee County 6,10 38.0 (30.3, 47.2) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.1 (-24.0, 31.2)
Pontotoc County 6,10 38.1 (27.5, 51.6) 9 2008-2012 * *
Pottawatomie County 6,10 38.3 (30.4, 47.6) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.6 (-18.3, 31.4)
Pittsburg County 6,10 38.4 (29.3, 49.8) 13 2008-2012 * *
Sequoyah County 6,10 38.6 (28.4, 51.5) 10 2008-2012 * *
McCurtain County 6,10 38.7 (27.6, 53.1) 8 2008-2012 * *
Tulsa County 6,10 38.7 (35.8, 41.8) 136 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.8 (-18.6, 13.8)
Haskell County 6,10 39.1 (22.5, 64.3) 3 2008-2012 * *
Washington County 6,10 39.5 (31.0, 50.0) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.1 (-12.9, 19.7)
Okmulgee County 6,10 39.7 (29.1, 53.0) 10 2008-2012 * *
McClain County 6,10 40.3 (28.6, 55.4) 8 2008-2012 * *
Ottawa County 6,10 40.9 (29.6, 55.5) 9 2008-2012 * *
Marshall County 6,10 41.3 (25.4, 64.2) 5 2008-2012 * *
Woodward County 6,10 41.6 (26.4, 62.8) 5 2008-2012 * *
Rogers County 6,10 42.1 (34.3, 51.3) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.5 (-17.3, 34.6)
Pushmataha County 6,10 42.3 (22.9, 72.3) 3 2008-2012 * *
Mayes County 6,10 43.0 (32.4, 56.1) 11 2008-2012 * *
Washita County 6,10 44.0 (26.2, 70.8) 4 2008-2012 * *
Stephens County 6,10 44.0 (34.0, 56.4) 14 2008-2012 * *
Creek County 6,10 44.4 (36.2, 54.2) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.5 (-25.6, 38.3)
Garvin County 6,10 45.0 (31.7, 62.3) 8 2008-2012 * *
McIntosh County 6,10 46.5 (33.2, 64.8) 8 2008-2012 * *
Canadian County 6,10 46.6 (39.1, 55.1) 28 2008-2012 stable stable trend 9.7 (-2.7, 23.8)
Delaware County 6,10 47.2 (36.3, 60.8) 14 2008-2012 * *
Jackson County 6,10 47.7 (32.9, 67.0) 7 2008-2012 * *
Noble County 6,10 47.8 (28.1, 77.0) 4 2008-2012 * *
Johnston County 6,10 47.9 (28.2, 77.4) 4 2008-2012 * *
Comanche County 6,10 48.2 (40.6, 56.9) 28 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.8 (-19.7, 31.6)
Payne County 6,10 49.0 (39.0, 60.8) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.0 (-34.2, 34.1)
Blaine County 6,10 52.7 (29.0, 88.5) 3 2008-2012 * *
Caddo County 6,10 55.4 (40.2, 74.6) 9 2008-2012 * *
Choctaw County 6,10 56.0 (36.5, 82.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
Craig County 6,10 56.3 (37.4, 82.4) 6 2008-2012 * *
Kiowa County 6,10 57.1 (31.6, 95.5) 3 2008-2012 * *
Texas County 6,10 57.1 (37.4, 83.3) 5 2008-2012 * *
Alfalfa County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Beaver County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Cimarron County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Coal County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Cotton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Dewey County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ellis County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Grant County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Greer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Harmon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Harper County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Jefferson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Kingfisher County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Latimer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Love County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Major County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Nowata County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Okfuskee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Roger Mills County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Tillman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Woods County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/30/2015 6:08 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top