Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Lung & Bronchus, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent AAPC
sort sort by trenddescending
Oklahoma 6,10 75.1 (73.9, 76.3) 3,073 2007-2011 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.4, -1.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 64.9 (64.7, 65.0) 212,768 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.6)
Oklahoma County 6,10 71.5 (68.7, 74.4) 509 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.5)
Tulsa County 6,10 71.6 (68.6, 74.8) 431 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.7 (-9.8, 0.6)
Cleveland County 6,10 76.7 (71.5, 82.2) 167 2007-2011 falling falling trend -7 (-10.3, -3.6)
Comanche County 6,10 77.2 (69.8, 85.1) 82 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.7 (-17.4, 0.9)
Creek County 6,10 95.4 (86.3, 105.3) 81 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.5 (-16.1, 11.1)
Canadian County 6,10 77.0 (69.5, 85.1) 81 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.3 (-15.8, 11.0)
Muskogee County 6,10 91.2 (82.3, 101.0) 77 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2 (-11.9, 18.0)
Rogers County 6,10 73.5 (65.8, 81.9) 68 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.5 (-14.7, 2.4)
Pottawatomie County 6,10 77.2 (68.8, 86.5) 62 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.7 (-7.5, 16.2)
Washington County 6,10 75.9 (66.8, 85.9) 53 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.5 (-2.8, 14.5)
Wagoner County 6,10 68.6 (60.2, 77.9) 52 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9 (-23.5, 8.3)
Pittsburg County 6,10 83.0 (73.1, 94.1) 51 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.9 (-10.2, 2.8)
Okmulgee County 6,10 97.9 (85.8, 111.3) 48 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.9 (-6.1, 17.2)
Carter County 6,10 82.5 (72.2, 94.0) 46 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.5 (-22.8, 25.7)
Le Flore County 6,10 75.5 (66.0, 86.1) 46 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11 (-36.4, 24.5)
Delaware County 6,10 73.8 (64.3, 84.6) 45 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.3 (-10.1, 8.2)
Mayes County 6,10 87.0 (75.8, 99.5) 45 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.1 (-25.0, 10.3)
Stephens County 6,10 71.6 (62.3, 81.9) 43 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.4 (-17.7, 6.4)
Bryan County 6,10 84.0 (73.1, 96.2) 43 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.4 (-20.6, 8.1)
Garfield County 6,10 59.1 (51.4, 67.7) 43 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.4 (-9.9, 10.2)
Payne County 6,10 66.2 (57.6, 75.8) 43 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.7 (-21.5, 22.9)
Kay County 6,10 70.0 (60.9, 80.3) 43 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.5 (-16.2, 18.1)
Grady County 6,10 71.8 (62.3, 82.4) 42 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.7 (-15.7, 7.8)
Cherokee County 6,10 81.9 (71.0, 94.1) 41 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.1 (-14.4, 16.6)
Osage County 6,10 66.6 (57.6, 76.7) 41 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.2 (-26.9, 5.4)
Sequoyah County 6,10 78.5 (67.7, 90.5) 40 2007-2011 stable stable trend -13 (-28.9, 6.3)
Ottawa County 6,10 87.0 (74.7, 100.8) 37 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.7 (-23.6, 2.1)
McCurtain County 6,10 88.0 (75.3, 102.2) 35 2007-2011 falling falling trend -9.5 (-17.7, -0.5)
Garvin County 6,10 89.6 (76.2, 105.0) 32 2007-2011 falling falling trend -15 (-27.3, -0.7)
McClain County 6,10 86.5 (73.3, 101.4) 32 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.4 (-17.5, 17.8)
Pontotoc County 6,10 72.7 (61.8, 85.0) 32 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8 (-25.4, 13.4)
McIntosh County 6,10 96.9 (82.0, 114.2) 32 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10 (-22.5, 4.5)
Lincoln County 6,10 73.8 (62.5, 86.6) 31 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.1 (-10.7, 12.2)
Logan County 6,10 71.6 (60.6, 83.9) 31 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.3 (-16.4, 0.6)
Caddo County 6,10 85.7 (72.3, 101.1) 29 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.4 (-16.5, 25.6)
Seminole County 6,10 87.6 (73.6, 103.7) 28 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.2 (-4.9, 9.8)
Craig County 6,10 101.7 (82.8, 123.9) 21 2007-2011 falling falling trend -12.9 (-19.7, -5.6)
Jackson County 6,10 74.1 (60.4, 90.0) 21 2007-2011 stable stable trend -13.3 (-37.1, 19.4)
Custer County 6,10 69.3 (56.3, 84.6) 20 2007-2011 stable stable trend 11.1 (-16.3, 47.4)
Marshall County 6,10 80.9 (65.3, 99.6) 19 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.1 (-23.9, 18.2)
Adair County 6,10 76.2 (61.2, 93.8) 18 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.8 (-11.5, 19.4)
Murray County 6,10 93.0 (74.3, 115.3) 17 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.4 (-23.2, 29.2)
Choctaw County 6,10 80.8 (64.5, 100.5) 17 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.4 (-12.5, 11.1)
Haskell County 6,10 99.2 (78.5, 124.0) 16 2007-2011 falling falling trend -19.3 (-33.3, -2.3)
Hughes County 6,10 88.2 (70.0, 110.1) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend 7.7 (-11.5, 31.1)
Beckham County 6,10 70.9 (56.2, 88.2) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.8 (-32.8, 13.3)
Pawnee County 6,10 64.3 (50.3, 81.4) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.8 (-24.5, 34.7)
Pushmataha County 6,10 85.9 (67.1, 109.1) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend -13.4 (-38.5, 22.0)
Kingfisher County 6,10 77.3 (60.1, 98.2) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.4 (-31.3, 27.5)
Atoka County 6,10 70.0 (53.5, 90.2) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.7 (-21.2, 28.7)
Okfuskee County 6,10 77.2 (59.1, 99.6) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.5 (-16.8, 33.7)
Woodward County 6,10 53.6 (40.9, 69.2) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -16.2 (-45.9, 29.8)
Blaine County 6,10 77.2 (57.5, 101.7) 10 2007-2011 falling falling trend -17 (-29.9, -1.7)
Johnston County 6,10 72.2 (53.6, 95.6) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -13.9 (-38.8, 20.9)
Nowata County 6,10 70.3 (52.2, 93.2) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.5 (-23.3, 26.6)
Washita County 6,10 68.7 (50.9, 91.1) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.9 (-29.5, 17.6)
Love County 6,10 77.4 (56.6, 104.0) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -16.3 (-39.5, 15.7)
Noble County 6,10 61.6 (45.0, 82.9) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.4 (-14.7, 37.7)
Kiowa County 6,10 66.9 (48.7, 90.5) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9 (-34.2, 25.9)
Jefferson County 6,10 92.5 (66.3, 126.9) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.6 (-31.1, 58.8)
Latimer County 6,10 58.3 (41.8, 79.6) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -19.6 (-53.2, 38.0)
Texas County 6,10 47.6 (34.2, 64.3) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.9 (-41.0, 56.5)
Tillman County 6,10 72.0 (51.0, 99.4) 8 2007-2011 falling falling trend -30.4 (-42.0, -16.5)
Alfalfa County 6,10 76.8 (52.8, 110.1) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.3 (-43.6, 39.4)
Coal County 6,10 80.1 (55.1, 114.0) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 7.2 (-37.0, 82.6)
Greer County 6,10 81.7 (55.9, 116.4) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.2 (-31.7, 26.1)
Major County 6,10 55.2 (36.0, 81.7) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 13.9 (-18.6, 59.4)
Cotton County 6,10 62.9 (41.3, 93.1) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.8 (-36.1, 19.1)
Ellis County 6,10 86.8 (55.0, 132.5) 5 2007-2011 falling falling trend -20.7 (-32.5, -6.9)
Grant County 6,10 68.5 (42.8, 106.2) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.9 (-46.9, 49.4)
Woods County 6,10 43.6 (27.1, 66.9) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.7 (-1.4, 11.2)
Harper County 6,10 68.7 (40.6, 111.6) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.9 (-56.6, 182.9)
Dewey County 6,10 47.0 (27.3, 78.1) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.4 (-46.2, 69.9)
Beaver County 6,10 43.0 (24.5, 71.5) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (0.0, 0.0)
Cimarron County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Harmon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Roger Mills County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2014 4:03 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are EAPCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top