Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oregon by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Colon & Rectum, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Oregon 6,10 34.0 (32.9, 35.1) 810 2008-2012 falling falling trend -6.0 (-9.0, -2.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 36.6 (36.5, 36.7) 67,886 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.4, -3.2)
Baker County 6,10 29.2 (17.7, 47.4) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Benton County 6,10 31.1 (24.1, 39.6) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Clackamas County 6,10 33.2 (30.0, 36.8) 80 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.2 (-10.6, 2.6)
Clatsop County 6,10 40.0 (29.7, 53.2) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Columbia County 6,10 35.2 (26.1, 46.6) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Coos County 6,10 32.2 (25.4, 40.6) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.7 (-15.0, 11.5)
Crook County 6,10 19.4 (10.9, 33.1) 3 2008-2012
*
*
Curry County 6,10 29.1 (19.4, 44.0) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Deschutes County 6,10 31.7 (26.8, 37.3) 31 2008-2012 stable stable trend -13.3 (-24.8, 0.1)
Douglas County 6,10 31.3 (25.7, 37.8) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.2 (-41.3, 50.1)
Gilliam County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Grant County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Harney County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Hood River County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Jackson County 6,10 37.6 (33.0, 42.6) 55 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.8 (-21.9, 13.6)
Jefferson County 6,10 29.0 (16.7, 47.1) 3 2008-2012
*
*
Josephine County 6,10 34.9 (28.5, 42.5) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend 19.4 (-12.1, 62.2)
Klamath County 6,10 42.6 (34.1, 52.6) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.5 (-22.6, 22.9)
Lake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Lane County 6,10 32.2 (28.9, 35.7) 74 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.7 (-22.9, 20.1)
Lincoln County 6,10 32.0 (24.1, 42.1) 13 2008-2012
*
*
Linn County 6,10 35.8 (29.9, 42.7) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.2 (-23.2, 14.5)
Malheur County 6,10 31.6 (20.0, 47.6) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Marion County 6,10 37.0 (33.1, 41.3) 68 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.1 (-10.8, 7.4)
Morrow County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Multnomah County 6,10 35.5 (32.8, 38.3) 139 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.8 (-23.1, 8.1)
Polk County 6,10 36.4 (29.1, 45.2) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.3 (-24.4, 21.2)
Sherman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Tillamook County 6,10 33.9 (23.0, 49.1) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Umatilla County 6,10 34.8 (27.2, 44.0) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.0 (-20.6, 11.2)
Union County 6,10 38.2 (26.1, 54.4) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Wallowa County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Wasco County 6,10 32.6 (21.9, 47.4) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Washington County 6,10 32.1 (29.1, 35.3) 86 2008-2012 falling falling trend -7.3 (-13.2, -0.9)
Wheeler County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Yamhill County 6,10 36.8 (30.2, 44.6) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend -17.0 (-36.9, 9.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/30/2015 10:33 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top