Speech users and low vision users click here for help on using this Web siteSkip to main content
 Incidence Rates Report
National Cancer Institute State Cancer Profiles Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Send to Printer   |   Close Window
Incidence Rate Report for Oregon by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Lung & Bronchus, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

Average Annual Count
Rate Period
Oregon6 57.6 (56.2, 59.1) 1,313 2006-2010
US (SEER+NPCR)1 54.4 (54.2, 54.5) 96,456 2006-2010
Wasco County6 83.0 (64.8, 105.3) 15 2006-2010
Lincoln County6 70.0 (58.8, 83.2) 29 2006-2010
Klamath County6 69.0 (58.6, 81.0) 32 2006-2010
Columbia County6 68.0 (54.7, 83.8) 19 2006-2010
Linn County6 68.0 (59.8, 77.1) 51 2006-2010
Coos County6 67.3 (57.7, 78.5) 36 2006-2010
Douglas County6 67.1 (59.4, 75.6) 58 2006-2010
Josephine County6 66.2 (57.8, 75.7) 47 2006-2010
Harney County6 65.5 (39.2, 106.8) 4 2006-2010
Tillamook County6 64.7 (50.0, 83.5) 13 2006-2010
Wallowa County6 63.6 (38.7, 104.2) 4 2006-2010
Morrow County6 63.0 (37.6, 99.8) 4 2006-2010
Lake County6 62.5 (36.8, 103.3) 4 2006-2010
Grant County6 61.8 (37.0, 101.7) 4 2006-2010
Curry County6 61.8 (47.3, 81.0) 14 2006-2010
Yamhill County6 61.6 (52.6, 71.9) 34 2006-2010
Multnomah County6 60.6 (56.9, 64.3) 220 2006-2010
Hood River County6 60.4 (42.1, 84.1) 7 2006-2010
Clatsop County6 59.2 (46.2, 74.9) 15 2006-2010
Malheur County6 57.7 (43.2, 76.0) 11 2006-2010
Lane County6 57.0 (52.5, 61.7) 126 2006-2010
Marion County6 56.8 (51.9, 62.0) 102 2006-2010
Jackson County6 55.9 (50.5, 61.7) 82 2006-2010
Polk County6 54.9 (45.5, 65.8) 25 2006-2010
Crook County6 54.7 (39.6, 74.6) 9 2006-2010
Clackamas County6 54.2 (49.8, 58.8) 120 2006-2010
Deschutes County6 51.8 (45.4, 58.9) 49 2006-2010
Baker County6 50.9 (35.3, 73.0) 7 2006-2010
Benton County6 49.4 (40.5, 59.8) 22 2006-2010
Jefferson County6 48.3 (32.2, 70.0) 6 2006-2010
Umatilla County6 48.3 (39.2, 58.9) 20 2006-2010
Washington County6 46.9 (43.0, 51.0) 114 2006-2010
Union County6 46.0 (32.6, 63.6) 8 2006-2010
Gilliam County6
*
3 or fewer
2006-2010
Sherman County6
*
3 or fewer
2006-2010
Wheeler County6
*
3 or fewer
2006-2010
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/23/2014 3:49 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2011 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2012 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission and SEER November 2012 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.