Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County
All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Breast, All Ages Sorted by Count
|
County
|
Annual Incidence Rate† over rate period (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Rate Period
|
|
Pennsylvania
6
|
125.8 (124.7, 127.0)
|
10,003
|
2005-2009
|
|
US (SEER+NPCR)
1
|
122.0 (121.8, 122.2)
|
§
|
2005-2009
|
|
Allegheny County
6
|
133.7 (130.1, 137.4)
|
1,123
|
2005-2009
|
|
Philadelphia County
6
|
122.0 (118.7, 125.3)
|
1,077
|
2005-2009
|
|
Montgomery County
6
|
138.1 (133.3, 142.9)
|
668
|
2005-2009
|
|
Bucks County
6
|
130.1 (125.0, 135.4)
|
499
|
2005-2009
|
|
Delaware County
6
|
136.8 (131.2, 142.6)
|
465
|
2005-2009
|
|
Chester County
6
|
135.5 (129.4, 141.9)
|
374
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lancaster County
6
|
119.8 (114.2, 125.7)
|
356
|
2005-2009
|
|
Westmoreland County
6
|
124.3 (118.2, 130.8)
|
329
|
2005-2009
|
|
York County
6
|
126.5 (120.3, 132.9)
|
319
|
2005-2009
|
|
Berks County
6
|
126.9 (120.5, 133.6)
|
303
|
2005-2009
|
|
Luzerne County
6
|
125.8 (119.0, 133.0)
|
278
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lehigh County
6
|
127.3 (120.4, 134.5)
|
266
|
2005-2009
|
|
Northampton County
6
|
127.1 (119.7, 134.7)
|
235
|
2005-2009
|
|
Erie County
6
|
123.9 (116.3, 131.8)
|
211
|
2005-2009
|
|
Dauphin County
6
|
131.4 (123.4, 139.8)
|
209
|
2005-2009
|
|
Washington County
6
|
130.6 (122.1, 139.7)
|
185
|
2005-2009
|
|
Cumberland County
6
|
124.9 (116.7, 133.6)
|
180
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lackawanna County
6
|
120.0 (111.8, 128.7)
|
175
|
2005-2009
|
|
Beaver County
6
|
123.7 (114.9, 133.0)
|
157
|
2005-2009
|
|
Butler County
6
|
129.7 (120.4, 139.6)
|
150
|
2005-2009
|
|
Cambria County
6
|
116.0 (106.4, 126.2)
|
121
|
2005-2009
|
|
Schuylkill County
6
|
109.6 (100.4, 119.5)
|
115
|
2005-2009
|
|
Franklin County
6
|
126.8 (116.4, 137.9)
|
115
|
2005-2009
|
|
Monroe County
6
|
122.7 (112.7, 133.4)
|
112
|
2005-2009
|
|
Fayette County
6
|
105.0 (96.0, 114.7)
|
107
|
2005-2009
|
|
Mercer County
6
|
123.8 (112.8, 135.6)
|
102
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lebanon County
6
|
116.7 (106.2, 128.0)
|
97
|
2005-2009
|
|
Blair County
6
|
107.3 (97.4, 117.9)
|
94
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lycoming County
6
|
115.0 (104.2, 126.6)
|
88
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lawrence County
6
|
126.7 (114.1, 140.4)
|
82
|
2005-2009
|
|
Adams County
6
|
126.8 (114.4, 140.3)
|
78
|
2005-2009
|
|
Northumberland County
6
|
115.4 (103.6, 128.3)
|
77
|
2005-2009
|
|
Centre County
6
|
118.1 (106.4, 130.7)
|
77
|
2005-2009
|
|
Clearfield County
6
|
127.8 (114.5, 142.5)
|
71
|
2005-2009
|
|
Crawford County
6
|
116.6 (104.4, 130.0)
|
69
|
2005-2009
|
|
Indiana County
6
|
122.9 (109.6, 137.4)
|
67
|
2005-2009
|
|
Somerset County
6
|
104.9 (92.6, 118.6)
|
57
|
2005-2009
|
|
Armstrong County
6
|
112.1 (98.8, 126.9)
|
55
|
2005-2009
|
|
Carbon County
6
|
123.1 (108.5, 139.3)
|
54
|
2005-2009
|
|
Bradford County
6
|
125.9 (110.7, 142.7)
|
52
|
2005-2009
|
|
Columbia County
6
|
122.5 (107.0, 139.7)
|
49
|
2005-2009
|
|
Venango County
6
|
131.8 (115.2, 150.3)
|
49
|
2005-2009
|
|
Bedford County
6
|
118.6 (102.3, 137.0)
|
40
|
2005-2009
|
|
Mifflin County
6
|
123.7 (106.6, 143.1)
|
40
|
2005-2009
|
|
Pike County
6
|
109.1 (94.3, 125.9)
|
40
|
2005-2009
|
|
Clarion County
6
|
144.1 (123.6, 167.2)
|
37
|
2005-2009
|
|
Perry County
6
|
140.6 (120.8, 162.9)
|
37
|
2005-2009
|
|
Tioga County
6
|
133.5 (114.3, 155.3)
|
37
|
2005-2009
|
|
Wayne County
6
|
105.1 (89.7, 122.7)
|
36
|
2005-2009
|
|
Warren County
6
|
118.9 (101.5, 138.7)
|
36
|
2005-2009
|
|
Jefferson County
6
|
108.4 (91.8, 127.3)
|
33
|
2005-2009
|
|
McKean County
6
|
116.2 (98.4, 136.4)
|
32
|
2005-2009
|
|
Susquehanna County
6
|
115.3 (97.6, 135.7)
|
31
|
2005-2009
|
|
Clinton County
6
|
127.0 (106.8, 150.2)
|
30
|
2005-2009
|
|
Greene County
6
|
117.1 (98.1, 138.9)
|
28
|
2005-2009
|
|
Union County
6
|
118.5 (99.0, 140.8)
|
28
|
2005-2009
|
|
Huntingdon County
6
|
93.1 (77.8, 110.8)
|
27
|
2005-2009
|
|
Snyder County
6
|
114.7 (95.7, 136.5)
|
27
|
2005-2009
|
|
Wyoming County
6
|
134.7 (110.8, 162.4)
|
23
|
2005-2009
|
|
Elk County
6
|
94.3 (76.6, 115.3)
|
22
|
2005-2009
|
|
Montour County
6
|
121.1 (95.2, 152.7)
|
16
|
2005-2009
|
|
Juniata County
6
|
106.4 (82.9, 134.7)
|
15
|
2005-2009
|
|
Potter County
6
|
113.6 (87.2, 146.2)
|
14
|
2005-2009
|
|
Fulton County
6
|
90.5 (65.5, 122.5)
|
9
|
2005-2009
|
|
Sullivan County
6
|
108.6 (71.7, 163.2)
|
6
|
2005-2009
|
|
Forest County
6
|
145.6 (93.6, 221.5)
|
6
|
2005-2009
|
|
Cameron County
6
|
127.2 (82.6, 191.9)
|
5
|
2005-2009
|
Notes: Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/18/2013 1:20 am. State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. † Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US populations included with the data release have been adjusted for the population shifts due to hurricanes Katrina and Rita for 62 counties and parishes in Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas. The 1969-2009 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates. § Because of the impact on Louisiana's population for the July - December 2005 time period due to Hurricanes Katrina/Rita, SEER excluded Louisiana cases diagnosed for that six month time period. The count has been suppressed due to data consistency issues.
1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2012 data submission and SEER November 2011 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2012 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.
|
|
|