 |
Incidence Rates Report
|
|
|
Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County
All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Breast, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
|
County
|
Annual Incidence Rate†
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Rate Period
|
| Pennsylvania6 |
125.8 (124.7, 127.0) |
10,003 |
2005-2009 |
| US (SEER+NPCR)1 |
122.0 (121.8, 122.2) |
§ |
2005-2009 |
| Forest County6 |
145.6 (93.6, 221.5) |
6 |
2005-2009 |
| Clarion County6 |
144.1 (123.6, 167.2) |
37 |
2005-2009 |
| Perry County6 |
140.6 (120.8, 162.9) |
37 |
2005-2009 |
| Montgomery County6 |
138.1 (133.3, 142.9) |
668 |
2005-2009 |
| Delaware County6 |
136.8 (131.2, 142.6) |
465 |
2005-2009 |
| Chester County6 |
135.5 (129.4, 141.9) |
374 |
2005-2009 |
| Wyoming County6 |
134.7 (110.8, 162.4) |
23 |
2005-2009 |
| Allegheny County6 |
133.7 (130.1, 137.4) |
1,123 |
2005-2009 |
| Tioga County6 |
133.5 (114.3, 155.3) |
37 |
2005-2009 |
| Venango County6 |
131.8 (115.2, 150.3) |
49 |
2005-2009 |
| Dauphin County6 |
131.4 (123.4, 139.8) |
209 |
2005-2009 |
| Washington County6 |
130.6 (122.1, 139.7) |
185 |
2005-2009 |
| Bucks County6 |
130.1 (125.0, 135.4) |
499 |
2005-2009 |
| Butler County6 |
129.7 (120.4, 139.6) |
150 |
2005-2009 |
| Clearfield County6 |
127.8 (114.5, 142.5) |
71 |
2005-2009 |
| Lehigh County6 |
127.3 (120.4, 134.5) |
266 |
2005-2009 |
| Cameron County6 |
127.2 (82.6, 191.9) |
5 |
2005-2009 |
| Northampton County6 |
127.1 (119.7, 134.7) |
235 |
2005-2009 |
| Clinton County6 |
127.0 (106.8, 150.2) |
30 |
2005-2009 |
| Berks County6 |
126.9 (120.5, 133.6) |
303 |
2005-2009 |
| Adams County6 |
126.8 (114.4, 140.3) |
78 |
2005-2009 |
| Franklin County6 |
126.8 (116.4, 137.9) |
115 |
2005-2009 |
| Lawrence County6 |
126.7 (114.1, 140.4) |
82 |
2005-2009 |
| York County6 |
126.5 (120.3, 132.9) |
319 |
2005-2009 |
| Bradford County6 |
125.9 (110.7, 142.7) |
52 |
2005-2009 |
| Luzerne County6 |
125.8 (119.0, 133.0) |
278 |
2005-2009 |
| Cumberland County6 |
124.9 (116.7, 133.6) |
180 |
2005-2009 |
| Westmoreland County6 |
124.3 (118.2, 130.8) |
329 |
2005-2009 |
| Erie County6 |
123.9 (116.3, 131.8) |
211 |
2005-2009 |
| Mercer County6 |
123.8 (112.8, 135.6) |
102 |
2005-2009 |
| Mifflin County6 |
123.7 (106.6, 143.1) |
40 |
2005-2009 |
| Beaver County6 |
123.7 (114.9, 133.0) |
157 |
2005-2009 |
| Carbon County6 |
123.1 (108.5, 139.3) |
54 |
2005-2009 |
| Indiana County6 |
122.9 (109.6, 137.4) |
67 |
2005-2009 |
| Monroe County6 |
122.7 (112.7, 133.4) |
112 |
2005-2009 |
| Columbia County6 |
122.5 (107.0, 139.7) |
49 |
2005-2009 |
| Philadelphia County6 |
122.0 (118.7, 125.3) |
1,077 |
2005-2009 |
| Montour County6 |
121.1 (95.2, 152.7) |
16 |
2005-2009 |
| Lackawanna County6 |
120.0 (111.8, 128.7) |
175 |
2005-2009 |
| Lancaster County6 |
119.8 (114.2, 125.7) |
356 |
2005-2009 |
| Warren County6 |
118.9 (101.5, 138.7) |
36 |
2005-2009 |
| Bedford County6 |
118.6 (102.3, 137.0) |
40 |
2005-2009 |
| Union County6 |
118.5 (99.0, 140.8) |
28 |
2005-2009 |
| Centre County6 |
118.1 (106.4, 130.7) |
77 |
2005-2009 |
| Greene County6 |
117.1 (98.1, 138.9) |
28 |
2005-2009 |
| Lebanon County6 |
116.7 (106.2, 128.0) |
97 |
2005-2009 |
| Crawford County6 |
116.6 (104.4, 130.0) |
69 |
2005-2009 |
| McKean County6 |
116.2 (98.4, 136.4) |
32 |
2005-2009 |
| Cambria County6 |
116.0 (106.4, 126.2) |
121 |
2005-2009 |
| Northumberland County6 |
115.4 (103.6, 128.3) |
77 |
2005-2009 |
| Susquehanna County6 |
115.3 (97.6, 135.7) |
31 |
2005-2009 |
| Lycoming County6 |
115.0 (104.2, 126.6) |
88 |
2005-2009 |
| Snyder County6 |
114.7 (95.7, 136.5) |
27 |
2005-2009 |
| Potter County6 |
113.6 (87.2, 146.2) |
14 |
2005-2009 |
| Armstrong County6 |
112.1 (98.8, 126.9) |
55 |
2005-2009 |
| Schuylkill County6 |
109.6 (100.4, 119.5) |
115 |
2005-2009 |
| Pike County6 |
109.1 (94.3, 125.9) |
40 |
2005-2009 |
| Sullivan County6 |
108.6 (71.7, 163.2) |
6 |
2005-2009 |
| Jefferson County6 |
108.4 (91.8, 127.3) |
33 |
2005-2009 |
| Blair County6 |
107.3 (97.4, 117.9) |
94 |
2005-2009 |
| Juniata County6 |
106.4 (82.9, 134.7) |
15 |
2005-2009 |
| Wayne County6 |
105.1 (89.7, 122.7) |
36 |
2005-2009 |
| Fayette County6 |
105.0 (96.0, 114.7) |
107 |
2005-2009 |
| Somerset County6 |
104.9 (92.6, 118.6) |
57 |
2005-2009 |
| Elk County6 |
94.3 (76.6, 115.3) |
22 |
2005-2009 |
| Huntingdon County6 |
93.1 (77.8, 110.8) |
27 |
2005-2009 |
| Fulton County6 |
90.5 (65.5, 122.5) |
9 |
2005-2009 |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/20/2013 9:26 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US populations included with the data release have been adjusted for the population shifts due to hurricanes Katrina and Rita for 62 counties and parishes in Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas. The 1969-2009 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
§ Because of the impact on Louisiana's population for the July - December 2005 time period due to Hurricanes Katrina/Rita, SEER excluded Louisiana cases diagnosed for that six month time period. The count has been suppressed due to data consistency issues.
1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2012 data submission and SEER November 2011 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2012 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.
|
| |
