Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Ovary, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent AAPC
sort sort by trenddescending
South Carolina 6,10 10.1 (9.6, 10.6) 276 2007-2011 falling falling trend -6.6 (-11.6, -1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 12.0 (12.0, 12.1) 21,341 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.7)
Abbeville County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Aiken County 6,10 12.0 (9.0, 15.6) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.2 (-37.8, 23.8)
Allendale County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Anderson County 6,10 9.0 (6.7, 11.8) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.8 (-44.3, 82.3)
Bamberg County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Barnwell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Beaufort County 6,10 8.4 (6.1, 11.4) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend 12.8 (-17.6, 54.5)
Berkeley County 6,10 12.5 (9.2, 16.5) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.9 (-37.0, 52.9)
Calhoun County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Charleston County 6,10 10.7 (8.8, 13.0) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.9 (-14.6, 1.4)
Cherokee County 6,10 11.4 (6.8, 18.0) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.4 (-48.5, 56.1)
Chester County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Chesterfield County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Clarendon County 6,10 14.3 (8.5, 23.3) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.8 (-47.5, 44.9)
Colleton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Darlington County 6,10 8.1 (4.8, 13.1) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 22.9 (-48.4, 192.7)
Dillon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Dorchester County 6,10 8.6 (5.8, 12.4) 6 2007-2011 falling falling trend -16.4 (-28.3, -2.5)
Edgefield County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Fairfield County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Florence County 6,10 7.4 (5.0, 10.6) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -16.6 (-40.2, 16.3)
Georgetown County 6,10 13.8 (9.2, 20.1) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -20.6 (-51.6, 30.3)
Greenville County 6,10 8.6 (7.0, 10.4) 22 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9 (-22.8, 7.3)
Greenwood County 6,10 7.5 (4.3, 12.3) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -15.5 (-56.8, 64.9)
Hampton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Horry County 6,10 12.0 (9.7, 14.6) 21 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.2 (-22.7, 16.2)
Jasper County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Kershaw County 6,10 10.8 (6.6, 16.7) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -35 (-63.7, 16.5)
Lancaster County 6,10 9.0 (5.4, 14.2) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -28.9 (-74.2, 95.8)
Laurens County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lexington County 6,10 8.8 (6.8, 11.3) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.5 (-29.3, 42.8)
Marion County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Marlboro County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
McCormick County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Newberry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Oconee County 6,10 9.5 (5.9, 14.5) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.7 (-36.3, 71.9)
Orangeburg County 6,10 10.7 (7.2, 15.4) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.3 (-38.7, 64.1)
Pickens County 6,10 8.9 (5.9, 13.0) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2 (-28.3, 44.9)
Richland County 6,10 12.1 (10.0, 14.6) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.4 (-29.3, 23.8)
Saluda County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Spartanburg County 6,10 12.7 (10.3, 15.5) 20 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.1 (-31.4, 23.2)
Sumter County 6,10 12.6 (9.0, 17.3) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.5 (-25.5, 17.3)
Union County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Williamsburg County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
York County 6,10 10.5 (8.1, 13.4) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend 7 (-15.1, 35.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/20/2014 7:23 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are EAPCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top