Incidence Rate Report for South Dakota by County
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Cancer Sites, All Ages Sorted by Count
|
County
|
Annual Incidence Rate† over rate period (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Rate Period
|
|
South Dakota
6
|
427.7 (421.6, 433.9)
|
3,816
|
2005-2009
|
|
US (SEER+NPCR)
1
|
465.0 (464.7, 465.4)
|
§
|
2005-2009
|
|
Minnehaha County
6
|
440.8 (426.9, 455.1)
|
770
|
2005-2009
|
|
Pennington County
6
|
443.8 (425.6, 462.6)
|
458
|
2005-2009
|
|
Brown County
6
|
433.0 (404.8, 462.8)
|
184
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lincoln County
6
|
531.0 (490.5, 573.9)
|
142
|
2005-2009
|
|
Codington County
6
|
403.2 (371.2, 437.2)
|
121
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lawrence County
6
|
409.2 (375.5, 445.3)
|
115
|
2005-2009
|
|
Meade County
6
|
446.7 (408.9, 487.0)
|
107
|
2005-2009
|
|
Brookings County
6
|
418.2 (382.0, 456.9)
|
103
|
2005-2009
|
|
Yankton County
6
|
382.0 (349.0, 417.4)
|
101
|
2005-2009
|
|
Davison County
6
|
439.4 (400.7, 481.0)
|
100
|
2005-2009
|
|
Beadle County
6
|
435.8 (396.6, 478.2)
|
96
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hughes County
6
|
443.4 (401.0, 489.2)
|
83
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lake County
6
|
445.3 (397.1, 498.0)
|
65
|
2005-2009
|
|
Fall River County
6
|
518.2 (457.5, 586.1)
|
62
|
2005-2009
|
|
Union County
6
|
367.7 (325.5, 414.1)
|
56
|
2005-2009
|
|
Charles Mix County
6
|
487.4 (428.1, 552.9)
|
53
|
2005-2009
|
|
Butte County
6
|
449.5 (395.3, 509.4)
|
51
|
2005-2009
|
|
Custer County
6
|
420.6 (365.6, 482.5)
|
48
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hutchinson County
6
|
410.0 (352.5, 475.0)
|
47
|
2005-2009
|
|
Turner County
6
|
396.4 (344.5, 454.6)
|
46
|
2005-2009
|
|
Bon Homme County
6
|
476.1 (413.1, 546.7)
|
45
|
2005-2009
|
|
Roberts County
6
|
364.7 (316.8, 418.2)
|
44
|
2005-2009
|
|
Grant County
6
|
384.1 (331.3, 444.3)
|
41
|
2005-2009
|
|
Clay County
6
|
379.0 (327.9, 435.8)
|
41
|
2005-2009
|
|
Spink County
6
|
426.9 (367.6, 493.8)
|
41
|
2005-2009
|
|
Kingsbury County
6
|
467.2 (400.4, 543.8)
|
39
|
2005-2009
|
|
Day County
6
|
434.2 (370.2, 507.6)
|
38
|
2005-2009
|
|
Tripp County
6
|
424.7 (361.5, 497.0)
|
35
|
2005-2009
|
|
McCook County
6
|
473.0 (402.4, 553.1)
|
35
|
2005-2009
|
|
Walworth County
6
|
392.3 (331.0, 463.2)
|
34
|
2005-2009
|
|
Gregory County
6
|
409.2 (342.9, 488.0)
|
31
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hamlin County
6
|
446.9 (376.2, 527.5)
|
30
|
2005-2009
|
|
Shannon County
6
|
444.7 (368.9, 530.0)
|
30
|
2005-2009
|
|
Moody County
6
|
380.0 (317.5, 451.5)
|
28
|
2005-2009
|
|
Marshall County
6
|
405.4 (335.7, 487.3)
|
26
|
2005-2009
|
|
Brule County
6
|
410.9 (341.2, 491.2)
|
26
|
2005-2009
|
|
Deuel County
6
|
425.1 (353.1, 508.9)
|
26
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lyman County
6
|
554.4 (458.0, 665.8)
|
24
|
2005-2009
|
|
Edmunds County
6
|
381.1 (310.7, 465.0)
|
23
|
2005-2009
|
|
Douglas County
6
|
501.4 (404.8, 617.1)
|
23
|
2005-2009
|
|
Todd County
6
|
378.2 (308.2, 458.0)
|
22
|
2005-2009
|
|
Dewey County
6
|
484.3 (395.7, 585.9)
|
22
|
2005-2009
|
|
Clark County
6
|
373.3 (301.7, 459.5)
|
21
|
2005-2009
|
|
Potter County
6
|
437.0 (347.6, 550.6)
|
19
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hand County
6
|
360.5 (280.3, 459.4)
|
18
|
2005-2009
|
|
Miner County
6
|
439.3 (340.6, 561.1)
|
18
|
2005-2009
|
|
Perkins County
6
|
339.4 (268.4, 427.7)
|
17
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hanson County
6
|
398.6 (308.5, 507.1)
|
16
|
2005-2009
|
|
Jerauld County
6
|
448.2 (344.4, 578.5)
|
15
|
2005-2009
|
|
Aurora County
6
|
363.7 (279.8, 467.0)
|
15
|
2005-2009
|
|
Sanborn County
6
|
411.7 (320.6, 524.0)
|
15
|
2005-2009
|
|
Stanley County
6
|
488.5 (379.0, 620.4)
|
15
|
2005-2009
|
|
McPherson County
6
|
309.9 (235.2, 406.3)
|
14
|
2005-2009
|
|
Faulk County
6
|
377.1 (289.1, 488.5)
|
14
|
2005-2009
|
|
Haakon County
6
|
460.7 (353.2, 597.0)
|
13
|
2005-2009
|
|
Bennett County
6
|
360.8 (272.9, 467.5)
|
11
|
2005-2009
|
|
Jackson County
6
|
409.5 (304.5, 538.3)
|
11
|
2005-2009
|
|
Corson County
6
|
269.5 (197.3, 358.7)
|
9
|
2005-2009
|
|
Mellette County
6
|
455.2 (333.2, 607.3)
|
9
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hyde County
6
|
332.6 (233.3, 468.8)
|
8
|
2005-2009
|
|
Jones County
6
|
557.5 (385.3, 784.9)
|
8
|
2005-2009
|
|
Sully County
6
|
431.9 (306.2, 597.0)
|
8
|
2005-2009
|
|
Buffalo County
6
|
453.0 (302.5, 647.5)
|
6
|
2005-2009
|
|
Campbell County
6
|
194.2 (124.8, 313.0)
|
5
|
2005-2009
|
|
Ziebach County
6
|
294.4 (185.5, 439.3)
|
5
|
2005-2009
|
|
Harding County
6
|
387.0 (245.7, 582.2)
|
5
|
2005-2009
|
Notes: Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/24/2013 7:44 am. State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. † Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US populations included with the data release have been adjusted for the population shifts due to hurricanes Katrina and Rita for 62 counties and parishes in Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas. The 1969-2009 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates. § Because of the impact on Louisiana's population for the July - December 2005 time period due to Hurricanes Katrina/Rita, SEER excluded Louisiana cases diagnosed for that six month time period. The count has been suppressed due to data consistency issues.
1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2012 data submission and SEER November 2011 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2012 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.
|
|
|