Incidence Rate Report for South Dakota by County
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Cancer Sites, All Ages Sorted by Rate
|
County
|
Annual Incidence Rate† over rate period (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Rate Period
|
|
South Dakota
6
|
427.7 (421.6, 433.9)
|
3,816
|
2005-2009
|
|
US (SEER+NPCR)
1
|
465.0 (464.7, 465.4)
|
§
|
2005-2009
|
|
Campbell County
6
|
194.2 (124.8, 313.0)
|
5
|
2005-2009
|
|
Corson County
6
|
269.5 (197.3, 358.7)
|
9
|
2005-2009
|
|
Ziebach County
6
|
294.4 (185.5, 439.3)
|
5
|
2005-2009
|
|
McPherson County
6
|
309.9 (235.2, 406.3)
|
14
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hyde County
6
|
332.6 (233.3, 468.8)
|
8
|
2005-2009
|
|
Perkins County
6
|
339.4 (268.4, 427.7)
|
17
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hand County
6
|
360.5 (280.3, 459.4)
|
18
|
2005-2009
|
|
Bennett County
6
|
360.8 (272.9, 467.5)
|
11
|
2005-2009
|
|
Aurora County
6
|
363.7 (279.8, 467.0)
|
15
|
2005-2009
|
|
Roberts County
6
|
364.7 (316.8, 418.2)
|
44
|
2005-2009
|
|
Union County
6
|
367.7 (325.5, 414.1)
|
56
|
2005-2009
|
|
Clark County
6
|
373.3 (301.7, 459.5)
|
21
|
2005-2009
|
|
Faulk County
6
|
377.1 (289.1, 488.5)
|
14
|
2005-2009
|
|
Todd County
6
|
378.2 (308.2, 458.0)
|
22
|
2005-2009
|
|
Clay County
6
|
379.0 (327.9, 435.8)
|
41
|
2005-2009
|
|
Moody County
6
|
380.0 (317.5, 451.5)
|
28
|
2005-2009
|
|
Edmunds County
6
|
381.1 (310.7, 465.0)
|
23
|
2005-2009
|
|
Yankton County
6
|
382.0 (349.0, 417.4)
|
101
|
2005-2009
|
|
Grant County
6
|
384.1 (331.3, 444.3)
|
41
|
2005-2009
|
|
Harding County
6
|
387.0 (245.7, 582.2)
|
5
|
2005-2009
|
|
Walworth County
6
|
392.3 (331.0, 463.2)
|
34
|
2005-2009
|
|
Turner County
6
|
396.4 (344.5, 454.6)
|
46
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hanson County
6
|
398.6 (308.5, 507.1)
|
16
|
2005-2009
|
|
Codington County
6
|
403.2 (371.2, 437.2)
|
121
|
2005-2009
|
|
Marshall County
6
|
405.4 (335.7, 487.3)
|
26
|
2005-2009
|
|
Gregory County
6
|
409.2 (342.9, 488.0)
|
31
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lawrence County
6
|
409.2 (375.5, 445.3)
|
115
|
2005-2009
|
|
Jackson County
6
|
409.5 (304.5, 538.3)
|
11
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hutchinson County
6
|
410.0 (352.5, 475.0)
|
47
|
2005-2009
|
|
Brule County
6
|
410.9 (341.2, 491.2)
|
26
|
2005-2009
|
|
Sanborn County
6
|
411.7 (320.6, 524.0)
|
15
|
2005-2009
|
|
Brookings County
6
|
418.2 (382.0, 456.9)
|
103
|
2005-2009
|
|
Custer County
6
|
420.6 (365.6, 482.5)
|
48
|
2005-2009
|
|
Tripp County
6
|
424.7 (361.5, 497.0)
|
35
|
2005-2009
|
|
Deuel County
6
|
425.1 (353.1, 508.9)
|
26
|
2005-2009
|
|
Spink County
6
|
426.9 (367.6, 493.8)
|
41
|
2005-2009
|
|
Sully County
6
|
431.9 (306.2, 597.0)
|
8
|
2005-2009
|
|
Brown County
6
|
433.0 (404.8, 462.8)
|
184
|
2005-2009
|
|
Day County
6
|
434.2 (370.2, 507.6)
|
38
|
2005-2009
|
|
Beadle County
6
|
435.8 (396.6, 478.2)
|
96
|
2005-2009
|
|
Potter County
6
|
437.0 (347.6, 550.6)
|
19
|
2005-2009
|
|
Miner County
6
|
439.3 (340.6, 561.1)
|
18
|
2005-2009
|
|
Davison County
6
|
439.4 (400.7, 481.0)
|
100
|
2005-2009
|
|
Minnehaha County
6
|
440.8 (426.9, 455.1)
|
770
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hughes County
6
|
443.4 (401.0, 489.2)
|
83
|
2005-2009
|
|
Pennington County
6
|
443.8 (425.6, 462.6)
|
458
|
2005-2009
|
|
Shannon County
6
|
444.7 (368.9, 530.0)
|
30
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lake County
6
|
445.3 (397.1, 498.0)
|
65
|
2005-2009
|
|
Meade County
6
|
446.7 (408.9, 487.0)
|
107
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hamlin County
6
|
446.9 (376.2, 527.5)
|
30
|
2005-2009
|
|
Jerauld County
6
|
448.2 (344.4, 578.5)
|
15
|
2005-2009
|
|
Butte County
6
|
449.5 (395.3, 509.4)
|
51
|
2005-2009
|
|
Buffalo County
6
|
453.0 (302.5, 647.5)
|
6
|
2005-2009
|
|
Mellette County
6
|
455.2 (333.2, 607.3)
|
9
|
2005-2009
|
|
Haakon County
6
|
460.7 (353.2, 597.0)
|
13
|
2005-2009
|
|
Kingsbury County
6
|
467.2 (400.4, 543.8)
|
39
|
2005-2009
|
|
McCook County
6
|
473.0 (402.4, 553.1)
|
35
|
2005-2009
|
|
Bon Homme County
6
|
476.1 (413.1, 546.7)
|
45
|
2005-2009
|
|
Dewey County
6
|
484.3 (395.7, 585.9)
|
22
|
2005-2009
|
|
Charles Mix County
6
|
487.4 (428.1, 552.9)
|
53
|
2005-2009
|
|
Stanley County
6
|
488.5 (379.0, 620.4)
|
15
|
2005-2009
|
|
Douglas County
6
|
501.4 (404.8, 617.1)
|
23
|
2005-2009
|
|
Fall River County
6
|
518.2 (457.5, 586.1)
|
62
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lincoln County
6
|
531.0 (490.5, 573.9)
|
142
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lyman County
6
|
554.4 (458.0, 665.8)
|
24
|
2005-2009
|
|
Jones County
6
|
557.5 (385.3, 784.9)
|
8
|
2005-2009
|
Notes: Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/19/2013 9:59 pm. State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. † Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US populations included with the data release have been adjusted for the population shifts due to hurricanes Katrina and Rita for 62 counties and parishes in Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas. The 1969-2009 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates. § Because of the impact on Louisiana's population for the July - December 2005 time period due to Hurricanes Katrina/Rita, SEER excluded Louisiana cases diagnosed for that six month time period. The count has been suppressed due to data consistency issues.
1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2012 data submission and SEER November 2011 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2012 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.
|
|
|