Incidence Rate Report for South Dakota by County
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Cancer Sites, All Ages Sorted by Rate
|
County
|
Annual Incidence Rate† over rate period (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Rate Period
|
|
South Dakota
6
|
427.7 (421.6, 433.9)
|
3,816
|
2005-2009
|
|
US (SEER+NPCR)
1
|
465.0 (464.7, 465.4)
|
§
|
2005-2009
|
|
Jones County
6
|
557.5 (385.3, 784.9)
|
8
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lyman County
6
|
554.4 (458.0, 665.8)
|
24
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lincoln County
6
|
531.0 (490.5, 573.9)
|
142
|
2005-2009
|
|
Fall River County
6
|
518.2 (457.5, 586.1)
|
62
|
2005-2009
|
|
Douglas County
6
|
501.4 (404.8, 617.1)
|
23
|
2005-2009
|
|
Stanley County
6
|
488.5 (379.0, 620.4)
|
15
|
2005-2009
|
|
Charles Mix County
6
|
487.4 (428.1, 552.9)
|
53
|
2005-2009
|
|
Dewey County
6
|
484.3 (395.7, 585.9)
|
22
|
2005-2009
|
|
Bon Homme County
6
|
476.1 (413.1, 546.7)
|
45
|
2005-2009
|
|
McCook County
6
|
473.0 (402.4, 553.1)
|
35
|
2005-2009
|
|
Kingsbury County
6
|
467.2 (400.4, 543.8)
|
39
|
2005-2009
|
|
Haakon County
6
|
460.7 (353.2, 597.0)
|
13
|
2005-2009
|
|
Mellette County
6
|
455.2 (333.2, 607.3)
|
9
|
2005-2009
|
|
Buffalo County
6
|
453.0 (302.5, 647.5)
|
6
|
2005-2009
|
|
Butte County
6
|
449.5 (395.3, 509.4)
|
51
|
2005-2009
|
|
Jerauld County
6
|
448.2 (344.4, 578.5)
|
15
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hamlin County
6
|
446.9 (376.2, 527.5)
|
30
|
2005-2009
|
|
Meade County
6
|
446.7 (408.9, 487.0)
|
107
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lake County
6
|
445.3 (397.1, 498.0)
|
65
|
2005-2009
|
|
Shannon County
6
|
444.7 (368.9, 530.0)
|
30
|
2005-2009
|
|
Pennington County
6
|
443.8 (425.6, 462.6)
|
458
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hughes County
6
|
443.4 (401.0, 489.2)
|
83
|
2005-2009
|
|
Minnehaha County
6
|
440.8 (426.9, 455.1)
|
770
|
2005-2009
|
|
Davison County
6
|
439.4 (400.7, 481.0)
|
100
|
2005-2009
|
|
Miner County
6
|
439.3 (340.6, 561.1)
|
18
|
2005-2009
|
|
Potter County
6
|
437.0 (347.6, 550.6)
|
19
|
2005-2009
|
|
Beadle County
6
|
435.8 (396.6, 478.2)
|
96
|
2005-2009
|
|
Day County
6
|
434.2 (370.2, 507.6)
|
38
|
2005-2009
|
|
Brown County
6
|
433.0 (404.8, 462.8)
|
184
|
2005-2009
|
|
Sully County
6
|
431.9 (306.2, 597.0)
|
8
|
2005-2009
|
|
Spink County
6
|
426.9 (367.6, 493.8)
|
41
|
2005-2009
|
|
Deuel County
6
|
425.1 (353.1, 508.9)
|
26
|
2005-2009
|
|
Tripp County
6
|
424.7 (361.5, 497.0)
|
35
|
2005-2009
|
|
Custer County
6
|
420.6 (365.6, 482.5)
|
48
|
2005-2009
|
|
Brookings County
6
|
418.2 (382.0, 456.9)
|
103
|
2005-2009
|
|
Sanborn County
6
|
411.7 (320.6, 524.0)
|
15
|
2005-2009
|
|
Brule County
6
|
410.9 (341.2, 491.2)
|
26
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hutchinson County
6
|
410.0 (352.5, 475.0)
|
47
|
2005-2009
|
|
Jackson County
6
|
409.5 (304.5, 538.3)
|
11
|
2005-2009
|
|
Lawrence County
6
|
409.2 (375.5, 445.3)
|
115
|
2005-2009
|
|
Gregory County
6
|
409.2 (342.9, 488.0)
|
31
|
2005-2009
|
|
Marshall County
6
|
405.4 (335.7, 487.3)
|
26
|
2005-2009
|
|
Codington County
6
|
403.2 (371.2, 437.2)
|
121
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hanson County
6
|
398.6 (308.5, 507.1)
|
16
|
2005-2009
|
|
Turner County
6
|
396.4 (344.5, 454.6)
|
46
|
2005-2009
|
|
Walworth County
6
|
392.3 (331.0, 463.2)
|
34
|
2005-2009
|
|
Harding County
6
|
387.0 (245.7, 582.2)
|
5
|
2005-2009
|
|
Grant County
6
|
384.1 (331.3, 444.3)
|
41
|
2005-2009
|
|
Yankton County
6
|
382.0 (349.0, 417.4)
|
101
|
2005-2009
|
|
Edmunds County
6
|
381.1 (310.7, 465.0)
|
23
|
2005-2009
|
|
Moody County
6
|
380.0 (317.5, 451.5)
|
28
|
2005-2009
|
|
Clay County
6
|
379.0 (327.9, 435.8)
|
41
|
2005-2009
|
|
Todd County
6
|
378.2 (308.2, 458.0)
|
22
|
2005-2009
|
|
Faulk County
6
|
377.1 (289.1, 488.5)
|
14
|
2005-2009
|
|
Clark County
6
|
373.3 (301.7, 459.5)
|
21
|
2005-2009
|
|
Union County
6
|
367.7 (325.5, 414.1)
|
56
|
2005-2009
|
|
Roberts County
6
|
364.7 (316.8, 418.2)
|
44
|
2005-2009
|
|
Aurora County
6
|
363.7 (279.8, 467.0)
|
15
|
2005-2009
|
|
Bennett County
6
|
360.8 (272.9, 467.5)
|
11
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hand County
6
|
360.5 (280.3, 459.4)
|
18
|
2005-2009
|
|
Perkins County
6
|
339.4 (268.4, 427.7)
|
17
|
2005-2009
|
|
Hyde County
6
|
332.6 (233.3, 468.8)
|
8
|
2005-2009
|
|
McPherson County
6
|
309.9 (235.2, 406.3)
|
14
|
2005-2009
|
|
Ziebach County
6
|
294.4 (185.5, 439.3)
|
5
|
2005-2009
|
|
Corson County
6
|
269.5 (197.3, 358.7)
|
9
|
2005-2009
|
|
Campbell County
6
|
194.2 (124.8, 313.0)
|
5
|
2005-2009
|
Notes: Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/22/2013 2:39 am. State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. † Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US populations included with the data release have been adjusted for the population shifts due to hurricanes Katrina and Rita for 62 counties and parishes in Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas. The 1969-2009 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates. § Because of the impact on Louisiana's population for the July - December 2005 time period due to Hurricanes Katrina/Rita, SEER excluded Louisiana cases diagnosed for that six month time period. The count has been suppressed due to data consistency issues.
1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2012 data submission and SEER November 2011 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2012 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.
|
|
|