Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Cancer Sites, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countascending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Tennessee 6,10 468.3 (466.0, 470.6) 33,308 2008-2012 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 453.8 (453.5, 454.1) 1,526,274 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Shelby County 6,10 461.5 (455.0, 468.0) 4,118 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Davidson County 6,10 472.2 (464.3, 480.2) 2,812 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.5)
Knox County 6,10 484.4 (475.4, 493.5) 2,294 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.3)
Hamilton County 6,10 470.9 (461.3, 480.7) 1,885 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -0.8)
Sullivan County 6,10 472.8 (459.6, 486.4) 1,019 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.2, 1.8)
Rutherford County 6,10 450.4 (437.4, 463.8) 970 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Sumner County 6,10 470.6 (456.1, 485.5) 828 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.3, 1.0)
Williamson County 6,10 443.4 (429.1, 458.2) 788 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 1.0)
Blount County 6,10 494.2 (478.3, 510.4) 769 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Washington County 6,10 451.1 (435.6, 467.0) 663 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.3, 4.8)
Montgomery County 6,10 446.6 (430.1, 463.5) 592 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.6, 5.6)
Wilson County 6,10 463.3 (446.0, 481.2) 573 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.0, 0.0)
Sevier County 6,10 493.9 (475.1, 513.4) 549 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.0, 4.6)
Bradley County 6,10 461.9 (444.1, 480.2) 524 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-6.2, 6.2)
Anderson County 6,10 499.5 (479.6, 520.1) 498 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.7, 4.9)
Madison County 6,10 434.0 (416.3, 452.2) 468 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.8, 4.7)
Cumberland County 6,10 481.9 (460.6, 503.9) 455 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.8 (-11.2, 1.9)
Greene County 6,10 469.7 (449.4, 490.7) 428 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.5, 1.8)
Maury County 6,10 450.4 (430.8, 470.8) 411 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.9, 4.9)
Roane County 6,10 492.7 (470.0, 516.3) 379 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.3, 5.0)
Hamblen County 6,10 489.4 (467.1, 512.7) 373 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.0 (-11.1, 1.6)
Hawkins County 6,10 500.6 (477.3, 524.9) 365 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.7 (-8.5, 7.8)
Putnam County 6,10 442.4 (421.9, 463.6) 362 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-6.6, 6.7)
Loudon County 6,10 467.4 (444.3, 491.6) 344 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.2 (-6.3, 9.3)
Robertson County 6,10 496.6 (472.8, 521.2) 343 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.0, 4.4)
Jefferson County 6,10 484.0 (459.5, 509.6) 310 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.9, 4.0)
Carter County 6,10 409.0 (388.4, 430.6) 309 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.1, 3.3)
McMinn County 6,10 447.5 (424.8, 471.1) 304 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.5 (-7.4, 4.8)
Coffee County 6,10 472.8 (448.8, 497.7) 301 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-9.7, 7.7)
Tipton County 6,10 484.6 (459.7, 510.6) 298 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.0 (-9.0, 3.4)
Gibson County 6,10 460.4 (436.4, 485.4) 285 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.3 (-7.3, 8.6)
Monroe County 6,10 482.9 (456.8, 510.1) 276 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.9 (-19.4, 3.0)
Dickson County 6,10 497.9 (471.4, 525.5) 273 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.5 (-9.3, 2.7)
Campbell County 6,10 491.8 (464.9, 520.0) 263 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.7, 6.3)
Franklin County 6,10 465.4 (439.1, 493.0) 246 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.9 (-13.8, 0.6)
Fayette County 6,10 471.4 (443.4, 500.9) 227 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.1 (-11.5, 3.8)
Bedford County 6,10 461.5 (434.5, 489.9) 224 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.7, 4.5)
Lawrence County 6,10 438.8 (413.0, 465.8) 224 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.3 (-5.3, 8.4)
Henry County 6,10 479.3 (450.6, 509.4) 223 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.1, 3.8)
Cocke County 6,10 469.2 (441.1, 498.8) 222 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.7, 3.5)
Warren County 6,10 453.3 (426.1, 481.7) 215 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Cheatham County 6,10 533.3 (500.5, 567.8) 214 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-8.1, 5.8)
Claiborne County 6,10 515.0 (483.5, 548.1) 211 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.1, 2.9)
Rhea County 6,10 532.5 (499.6, 567.1) 206 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.7 (-10.0, 3.0)
Obion County 6,10 455.6 (426.4, 486.5) 189 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.1 (-11.9, 2.2)
Marion County 6,10 521.2 (487.2, 557.1) 187 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.9, 10.7)
Dyer County 6,10 408.0 (381.6, 435.9) 183 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.2, 3.9)
Lincoln County 6,10 421.9 (394.4, 450.9) 183 2008-2012 falling falling trend -9.1 (-12.7, -5.4)
Weakley County 6,10 443.1 (414.1, 473.6) 182 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.0, 3.5)
Carroll County 6,10 475.2 (443.8, 508.3) 181 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.7 (-5.4, 7.3)
Giles County 6,10 469.4 (438.2, 502.4) 178 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.7 (-5.1, 11.0)
Marshall County 6,10 490.5 (457.2, 525.7) 168 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.2 (-10.6, 2.7)
Hardin County 6,10 456.8 (424.8, 490.8) 162 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.1 (-10.3, 6.7)
White County 6,10 459.9 (427.5, 494.3) 158 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.1 (-9.0, 12.2)
Henderson County 6,10 467.1 (434.2, 501.8) 155 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.0, 6.3)
Hardeman County 6,10 480.3 (446.4, 516.2) 154 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 1.2)
McNairy County 6,10 433.7 (402.1, 467.2) 148 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.6 (-4.1, 14.1)
Hickman County 6,10 509.6 (472.3, 549.3) 143 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.7 (-12.6, 1.6)
Grainger County 6,10 496.0 (459.1, 535.4) 143 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.8, -0.1)
Lauderdale County 6,10 484.4 (448.7, 522.2) 141 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5)
Overton County 6,10 470.1 (434.5, 507.9) 137 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-11.7, 12.2)
Macon County 6,10 531.4 (491.3, 573.9) 135 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.0 (-13.3, 4.2)
Scott County 6,10 535.4 (494.8, 578.5) 134 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-9.4, 11.3)
Benton County 6,10 533.9 (491.4, 579.4) 127 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-7.9, 7.5)
Humphreys County 6,10 527.3 (485.8, 571.5) 127 2008-2012 stable stable trend 7.3 (-5.1, 21.3)
Morgan County 6,10 488.7 (450.4, 529.4) 126 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.7 (-9.4, 6.6)
Unicoi County 6,10 444.8 (408.4, 484.0) 117 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.5 (-10.6, 8.6)
Union County 6,10 526.2 (483.1, 572.2) 117 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.4 (-3.2, 10.5)
Fentress County 6,10 496.6 (455.5, 540.6) 116 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.8 (-12.6, 8.1)
Polk County 6,10 480.2 (439.3, 524.1) 108 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.2 (-7.7, 8.7)
Smith County 6,10 486.5 (445.1, 530.8) 106 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.8, 2.1)
Johnson County 6,10 414.7 (378.5, 453.7) 102 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.2 (-3.6, 10.5)
DeKalb County 6,10 422.5 (385.3, 462.5) 99 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.8 (-5.2, 7.1)
Haywood County 6,10 457.4 (417.2, 500.5) 99 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.7 (-4.5, 10.5)
Wayne County 6,10 434.8 (395.7, 477.0) 93 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.6 (-11.7, 2.9)
Stewart County 6,10 514.7 (466.6, 566.7) 88 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.6 (-7.7, 14.2)
Cannon County 6,10 469.4 (424.4, 518.1) 83 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 3.8)
Grundy County 6,10 460.3 (415.4, 509.1) 82 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.6 (-13.1, 4.7)
Lewis County 6,10 538.7 (486.1, 595.7) 82 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-11.3, 13.6)
Sequatchie County 6,10 465.4 (419.8, 514.9) 81 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.5 (-10.9, 13.3)
Chester County 6,10 407.4 (367.4, 450.6) 78 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.6 (-10.3, 10.1)
Crockett County 6,10 430.1 (387.3, 476.6) 77 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.3 (-10.1, 8.3)
Bledsoe County 6,10 459.1 (412.1, 510.3) 74 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.8 (-7.8, 10.2)
Decatur County 6,10 431.5 (387.0, 480.3) 74 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -0.9)
Jackson County 6,10 449.1 (401.8, 501.0) 71 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.6 (-12.8, 6.5)
Meigs County 6,10 461.4 (412.2, 515.2) 71 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.9 (-10.7, 14.0)
Perry County 6,10 492.4 (432.0, 559.6) 52 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.1, 4.5)
Houston County 6,10 457.0 (400.5, 519.7) 50 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.3 (-8.3, 20.9)
Clay County 6,10 437.1 (382.0, 498.6) 50 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.3 (-15.5, 10.7)
Hancock County 6,10 483.5 (419.1, 555.8) 44 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.8 (-25.7, 24.5)
Trousdale County 6,10 462.6 (400.6, 531.8) 42 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.5 (-2.8, 14.5)
Pickett County 6,10 483.4 (412.3, 564.8) 38 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.1 (-8.2, 15.7)
Lake County 6,10 413.7 (355.0, 479.9) 36 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.8 (-9.6, 16.9)
Moore County 6,10 408.9 (349.5, 476.5) 36 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.1 (-17.9, 26.8)
Van Buren County 6,10 468.4 (398.7, 547.8) 36 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.7 (-17.4, 14.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/28/2015 1:44 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top