Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Colon & Rectum, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Tennessee 6,10 43.3 (42.6, 44.0) 3,039 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.5, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 41.9 (41.8, 42.0) 140,433 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.7, -3.0)
Loudon County 6,10 27.9 (22.5, 34.3) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-11.3, 13.7)
Williamson County 6,10 34.0 (30.1, 38.2) 60 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.7 (-14.9, 13.4)
Carter County 6,10 34.5 (28.6, 41.2) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.9 (-13.3, 17.4)
Morgan County 6,10 35.9 (26.0, 48.5) 9 2008-2012 * *
Unicoi County 6,10 35.9 (26.3, 48.4) 10 2008-2012 * *
Polk County 6,10 36.9 (26.1, 51.2) 8 2008-2012 * *
Washington County 6,10 37.7 (33.4, 42.5) 56 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.4 (-15.9, 6.3)
McMinn County 6,10 37.9 (31.4, 45.3) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.4 (-0.8, 10.0)
Knox County 6,10 37.9 (35.4, 40.5) 178 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.0 (-10.6, 3.0)
Sumner County 6,10 38.5 (34.4, 43.0) 67 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.4 (-19.2, 8.5)
Lawrence County 6,10 38.7 (31.3, 47.4) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -11.1 (-37.5, 26.6)
Greene County 6,10 39.0 (33.3, 45.6) 35 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.4 (-14.5, 9.1)
Monroe County 6,10 39.2 (32.0, 47.6) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend -11.7 (-33.8, 17.8)
Campbell County 6,10 39.5 (32.1, 48.2) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.8 (-22.9, 34.4)
Decatur County 6,10 39.6 (27.5, 56.0) 7 2008-2012 * *
Sullivan County 6,10 39.7 (35.9, 43.8) 85 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.6 (-15.2, 7.3)
Hancock County 6,10 39.8 (23.8, 63.8) 4 2008-2012 * *
Cumberland County 6,10 40.0 (34.1, 46.8) 38 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.9 (-27.0, 26.6)
Montgomery County 6,10 40.0 (35.1, 45.4) 51 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.6 (-15.8, 5.9)
McNairy County 6,10 40.3 (31.3, 51.3) 14 2008-2012 * *
Roane County 6,10 40.4 (34.2, 47.6) 31 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.1 (-6.2, 13.3)
Hamilton County 6,10 41.0 (38.2, 44.0) 163 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -2.0)
Jefferson County 6,10 41.3 (34.2, 49.5) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.9 (-13.4, 2.2)
Putnam County 6,10 41.5 (35.4, 48.4) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.1 (-22.0, 31.0)
Maury County 6,10 41.7 (35.9, 48.2) 38 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-13.4, 16.5)
Marshall County 6,10 41.8 (32.4, 53.0) 14 2008-2012 * *
Chester County 6,10 42.6 (30.3, 58.2) 8 2008-2012 * *
Bledsoe County 6,10 42.6 (29.3, 60.3) 7 2008-2012 * *
Dyer County 6,10 42.7 (34.5, 52.3) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -15.4 (-29.8, 1.9)
Rutherford County 6,10 42.8 (38.7, 47.0) 90 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.9 (-5.8, 10.3)
Blount County 6,10 42.8 (38.2, 47.8) 65 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.2 (-19.6, 24.8)
Davidson County 6,10 43.0 (40.6, 45.5) 249 2008-2012 falling falling trend -7.2 (-11.4, -2.8)
Coffee County 6,10 43.1 (36.1, 51.0) 28 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.8 (-17.3, 11.9)
Cocke County 6,10 43.1 (35.0, 52.8) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.2 (-22.4, 20.7)
Madison County 6,10 43.2 (37.8, 49.2) 47 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-16.7, 17.2)
Wilson County 6,10 43.3 (38.1, 49.1) 52 2008-2012 stable stable trend -9.2 (-18.5, 1.1)
Warren County 6,10 43.5 (35.4, 52.9) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.1 (-12.9, 1.2)
Sevier County 6,10 43.5 (38.0, 49.6) 47 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.3 (-20.8, 15.6)
Johnson County 6,10 43.7 (32.7, 57.5) 11 2008-2012 * *
Meigs County 6,10 43.8 (29.3, 63.4) 6 2008-2012 * *
White County 6,10 43.8 (34.1, 55.7) 14 2008-2012 * *
Sequatchie County 6,10 44.0 (30.8, 61.2) 8 2008-2012 * *
Lewis County 6,10 44.1 (29.9, 63.0) 7 2008-2012 * *
Bradley County 6,10 44.2 (38.8, 50.1) 50 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.9 (-21.0, 14.5)
Hamblen County 6,10 44.3 (37.7, 51.8) 33 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.7 (-20.0, 8.8)
Carroll County 6,10 44.4 (35.5, 55.2) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -12.9 (-28.3, 5.9)
Claiborne County 6,10 45.3 (36.1, 56.1) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend 8.9 (-7.8, 28.6)
Anderson County 6,10 45.3 (39.5, 51.9) 45 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.0 (-18.2, 3.5)
Bedford County 6,10 45.6 (37.3, 55.2) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend 8.8 (-11.4, 33.7)
Cannon County 6,10 46.2 (33.1, 63.2) 8 2008-2012 * *
Crockett County 6,10 46.2 (33.0, 63.2) 8 2008-2012 * *
Henry County 6,10 46.3 (37.7, 56.6) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.6 (-17.5, 12.7)
Haywood County 6,10 46.3 (34.2, 61.6) 10 2008-2012 * *
Hawkins County 6,10 46.5 (39.7, 54.4) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.6 (-21.7, 26.2)
Hickman County 6,10 46.6 (35.7, 59.8) 13 2008-2012 * *
Weakley County 6,10 46.6 (37.9, 57.0) 20 2008-2012 falling falling trend -18.8 (-26.5, -10.4)
Shelby County 6,10 46.7 (44.7, 48.9) 411 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.5, 0.7)
Marion County 6,10 46.8 (36.8, 58.7) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.9 (-19.2, 38.9)
DeKalb County 6,10 46.8 (34.9, 61.8) 11 2008-2012 * *
Wayne County 6,10 46.9 (34.8, 62.3) 10 2008-2012 * *
Humphreys County 6,10 47.7 (36.4, 62.0) 12 2008-2012 * *
Clay County 6,10 48.1 (31.5, 71.6) 6 2008-2012 * *
Rhea County 6,10 48.2 (38.5, 59.7) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.3 (-34.9, 29.1)
Henderson County 6,10 48.3 (38.2, 60.3) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.4 (-24.1, 38.2)
Hardeman County 6,10 48.4 (37.9, 60.9) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.6 (-14.2, 8.4)
Jackson County 6,10 48.4 (33.6, 68.2) 8 2008-2012 * *
Grainger County 6,10 49.2 (38.1, 62.8) 14 2008-2012 * *
Gibson County 6,10 49.4 (41.8, 58.1) 31 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.0 (-16.8, 8.6)
Moore County 6,10 49.6 (30.9, 77.2) 4 2008-2012 * *
Pickett County 6,10 50.2 (29.8, 81.8) 4 2008-2012 * *
Lauderdale County 6,10 51.3 (40.1, 64.6) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.1 (-19.4, 39.6)
Macon County 6,10 51.3 (39.3, 65.9) 13 2008-2012 * *
Obion County 6,10 51.5 (41.9, 62.7) 21 2008-2012 falling falling trend -19.8 (-34.0, -2.4)
Overton County 6,10 51.6 (40.1, 65.5) 14 2008-2012 * *
Robertson County 6,10 51.8 (44.2, 60.3) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.9 (-14.3, 5.5)
Perry County 6,10 51.9 (33.7, 77.2) 6 2008-2012 * *
Tipton County 6,10 51.9 (43.8, 61.0) 31 2008-2012 stable stable trend -11.1 (-22.6, 2.1)
Hardin County 6,10 53.4 (43.0, 65.9) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.4 (-9.7, 1.3)
Fentress County 6,10 53.5 (40.5, 69.6) 12 2008-2012 * *
Smith County 6,10 53.7 (40.3, 70.3) 11 2008-2012 * *
Fayette County 6,10 53.8 (44.3, 64.7) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.2 (-17.0, 12.9)
Scott County 6,10 54.0 (41.6, 69.2) 13 2008-2012 * *
Union County 6,10 54.2 (40.6, 70.9) 11 2008-2012 * *
Franklin County 6,10 54.3 (45.7, 64.2) 29 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.6 (-32.9, 33.0)
Lincoln County 6,10 55.0 (45.4, 66.2) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.2 (-32.6, 27.8)
Cheatham County 6,10 55.1 (44.5, 67.3) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -10.7 (-33.5, 19.7)
Benton County 6,10 55.4 (42.8, 71.2) 14 2008-2012 * *
Grundy County 6,10 55.4 (40.6, 74.3) 10 2008-2012 * *
Dickson County 6,10 56.6 (47.8, 66.5) 31 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.4 (-12.0, 6.1)
Stewart County 6,10 56.9 (41.5, 76.5) 9 2008-2012 * *
Van Buren County 6,10 57.8 (35.8, 90.2) 5 2008-2012 * *
Giles County 6,10 60.0 (49.2, 72.6) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.1 (-13.0, 22.3)
Houston County 6,10 61.1 (41.3, 87.7) 6 2008-2012 * *
Trousdale County 6,10 62.7 (40.9, 92.2) 5 2008-2012 * *
Lake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/05/2015 12:20 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top