Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Colon & Rectum, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Tennessee 6,10 43.3 (42.6, 44.0) 3,039 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.5, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 41.9 (41.8, 42.0) 140,433 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.7, -3.0)
Trousdale County 6,10 62.7 (40.9, 92.2) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Houston County 6,10 61.1 (41.3, 87.7) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Giles County 6,10 60.0 (49.2, 72.6) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.1 (-13.0, 22.3)
Van Buren County 6,10 57.8 (35.8, 90.2) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Stewart County 6,10 56.9 (41.5, 76.5) 9 2008-2012
*
*
Dickson County 6,10 56.6 (47.8, 66.5) 31 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.4 (-12.0, 6.1)
Grundy County 6,10 55.4 (40.6, 74.3) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Benton County 6,10 55.4 (42.8, 71.2) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Cheatham County 6,10 55.1 (44.5, 67.3) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -10.7 (-33.5, 19.7)
Lincoln County 6,10 55.0 (45.4, 66.2) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.2 (-32.6, 27.8)
Franklin County 6,10 54.3 (45.7, 64.2) 29 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.6 (-32.9, 33.0)
Union County 6,10 54.2 (40.6, 70.9) 11 2008-2012
*
*
Scott County 6,10 54.0 (41.6, 69.2) 13 2008-2012
*
*
Fayette County 6,10 53.8 (44.3, 64.7) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.2 (-17.0, 12.9)
Smith County 6,10 53.7 (40.3, 70.3) 11 2008-2012
*
*
Fentress County 6,10 53.5 (40.5, 69.6) 12 2008-2012
*
*
Hardin County 6,10 53.4 (43.0, 65.9) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.4 (-9.7, 1.3)
Tipton County 6,10 51.9 (43.8, 61.0) 31 2008-2012 stable stable trend -11.1 (-22.6, 2.1)
Perry County 6,10 51.9 (33.7, 77.2) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Robertson County 6,10 51.8 (44.2, 60.3) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.9 (-14.3, 5.5)
Overton County 6,10 51.6 (40.1, 65.5) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Obion County 6,10 51.5 (41.9, 62.7) 21 2008-2012 falling falling trend -19.8 (-34.0, -2.4)
Macon County 6,10 51.3 (39.3, 65.9) 13 2008-2012
*
*
Lauderdale County 6,10 51.3 (40.1, 64.6) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.1 (-19.4, 39.6)
Pickett County 6,10 50.2 (29.8, 81.8) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Moore County 6,10 49.6 (30.9, 77.2) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Gibson County 6,10 49.4 (41.8, 58.1) 31 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.0 (-16.8, 8.6)
Grainger County 6,10 49.2 (38.1, 62.8) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Jackson County 6,10 48.4 (33.6, 68.2) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Hardeman County 6,10 48.4 (37.9, 60.9) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.6 (-14.2, 8.4)
Henderson County 6,10 48.3 (38.2, 60.3) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.4 (-24.1, 38.2)
Rhea County 6,10 48.2 (38.5, 59.7) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.3 (-34.9, 29.1)
Clay County 6,10 48.1 (31.5, 71.6) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Humphreys County 6,10 47.7 (36.4, 62.0) 12 2008-2012
*
*
Wayne County 6,10 46.9 (34.8, 62.3) 10 2008-2012
*
*
DeKalb County 6,10 46.8 (34.9, 61.8) 11 2008-2012
*
*
Marion County 6,10 46.8 (36.8, 58.7) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.9 (-19.2, 38.9)
Shelby County 6,10 46.7 (44.7, 48.9) 411 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.5, 0.7)
Weakley County 6,10 46.6 (37.9, 57.0) 20 2008-2012 falling falling trend -18.8 (-26.5, -10.4)
Hickman County 6,10 46.6 (35.7, 59.8) 13 2008-2012
*
*
Hawkins County 6,10 46.5 (39.7, 54.4) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.6 (-21.7, 26.2)
Haywood County 6,10 46.3 (34.2, 61.6) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Henry County 6,10 46.3 (37.7, 56.6) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.6 (-17.5, 12.7)
Crockett County 6,10 46.2 (33.0, 63.2) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Cannon County 6,10 46.2 (33.1, 63.2) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Bedford County 6,10 45.6 (37.3, 55.2) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend 8.8 (-11.4, 33.7)
Anderson County 6,10 45.3 (39.5, 51.9) 45 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.0 (-18.2, 3.5)
Claiborne County 6,10 45.3 (36.1, 56.1) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend 8.9 (-7.8, 28.6)
Carroll County 6,10 44.4 (35.5, 55.2) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -12.9 (-28.3, 5.9)
Hamblen County 6,10 44.3 (37.7, 51.8) 33 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.7 (-20.0, 8.8)
Bradley County 6,10 44.2 (38.8, 50.1) 50 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.9 (-21.0, 14.5)
Lewis County 6,10 44.1 (29.9, 63.0) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Sequatchie County 6,10 44.0 (30.8, 61.2) 8 2008-2012
*
*
White County 6,10 43.8 (34.1, 55.7) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Meigs County 6,10 43.8 (29.3, 63.4) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Johnson County 6,10 43.7 (32.7, 57.5) 11 2008-2012
*
*
Sevier County 6,10 43.5 (38.0, 49.6) 47 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.3 (-20.8, 15.6)
Warren County 6,10 43.5 (35.4, 52.9) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.1 (-12.9, 1.2)
Wilson County 6,10 43.3 (38.1, 49.1) 52 2008-2012 stable stable trend -9.2 (-18.5, 1.1)
Madison County 6,10 43.2 (37.8, 49.2) 47 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-16.7, 17.2)
Cocke County 6,10 43.1 (35.0, 52.8) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.2 (-22.4, 20.7)
Coffee County 6,10 43.1 (36.1, 51.0) 28 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.8 (-17.3, 11.9)
Davidson County 6,10 43.0 (40.6, 45.5) 249 2008-2012 falling falling trend -7.2 (-11.4, -2.8)
Blount County 6,10 42.8 (38.2, 47.8) 65 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.2 (-19.6, 24.8)
Rutherford County 6,10 42.8 (38.7, 47.0) 90 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.9 (-5.8, 10.3)
Dyer County 6,10 42.7 (34.5, 52.3) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -15.4 (-29.8, 1.9)
Bledsoe County 6,10 42.6 (29.3, 60.3) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Chester County 6,10 42.6 (30.3, 58.2) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Marshall County 6,10 41.8 (32.4, 53.0) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Maury County 6,10 41.7 (35.9, 48.2) 38 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-13.4, 16.5)
Putnam County 6,10 41.5 (35.4, 48.4) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.1 (-22.0, 31.0)
Jefferson County 6,10 41.3 (34.2, 49.5) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.9 (-13.4, 2.2)
Hamilton County 6,10 41.0 (38.2, 44.0) 163 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -2.0)
Roane County 6,10 40.4 (34.2, 47.6) 31 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.1 (-6.2, 13.3)
McNairy County 6,10 40.3 (31.3, 51.3) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Montgomery County 6,10 40.0 (35.1, 45.4) 51 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.6 (-15.8, 5.9)
Cumberland County 6,10 40.0 (34.1, 46.8) 38 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.9 (-27.0, 26.6)
Hancock County 6,10 39.8 (23.8, 63.8) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Sullivan County 6,10 39.7 (35.9, 43.8) 85 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.6 (-15.2, 7.3)
Decatur County 6,10 39.6 (27.5, 56.0) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Campbell County 6,10 39.5 (32.1, 48.2) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.8 (-22.9, 34.4)
Monroe County 6,10 39.2 (32.0, 47.6) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend -11.7 (-33.8, 17.8)
Greene County 6,10 39.0 (33.3, 45.6) 35 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.4 (-14.5, 9.1)
Lawrence County 6,10 38.7 (31.3, 47.4) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -11.1 (-37.5, 26.6)
Sumner County 6,10 38.5 (34.4, 43.0) 67 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.4 (-19.2, 8.5)
Knox County 6,10 37.9 (35.4, 40.5) 178 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.0 (-10.6, 3.0)
McMinn County 6,10 37.9 (31.4, 45.3) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.4 (-0.8, 10.0)
Washington County 6,10 37.7 (33.4, 42.5) 56 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.4 (-15.9, 6.3)
Polk County 6,10 36.9 (26.1, 51.2) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Unicoi County 6,10 35.9 (26.3, 48.4) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Morgan County 6,10 35.9 (26.0, 48.5) 9 2008-2012
*
*
Carter County 6,10 34.5 (28.6, 41.2) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.9 (-13.3, 17.4)
Williamson County 6,10 34.0 (30.1, 38.2) 60 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.7 (-14.9, 13.4)
Loudon County 6,10 27.9 (22.5, 34.3) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-11.3, 13.7)
Lake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/31/2015 9:15 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top