Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Ovary, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Tennessee 6,10 11.6 (11.1, 12.1) 442 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.0, 2.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 11.8 (11.8, 11.9) 21,341 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.8)
Anderson County 6,10 14.8 (10.3, 20.8) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Bedford County 6,10 14.2 (8.3, 22.7) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Benton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Bledsoe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Blount County 6,10 10.1 (7.2, 13.8) 9 2008-2012
*
*
Bradley County 6,10 17.0 (12.6, 22.6) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Campbell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Cannon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Carroll County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Carter County 6,10 11.7 (7.4, 17.9) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Cheatham County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Chester County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Claiborne County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Clay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Cocke County 6,10 13.8 (8.0, 22.7) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Coffee County 6,10 9.3 (5.3, 15.4) 3 2008-2012
*
*
Crockett County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Cumberland County 6,10 10.6 (6.6, 16.4) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Davidson County 6,10 10.5 (9.0, 12.2) 35 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.4 (-13.1, 7.4)
DeKalb County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Decatur County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Dickson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Dyer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Fayette County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Fentress County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Franklin County 6,10 13.3 (7.3, 22.1) 3 2008-2012
*
*
Gibson County 6,10 14.4 (9.3, 21.6) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Giles County 6,10 17.5 (9.5, 29.6) 3 2008-2012
*
*
Grainger County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Greene County 6,10 13.1 (8.8, 19.1) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Grundy County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Hamblen County 6,10 7.4 (4.1, 12.3) 3 2008-2012
*
*
Hamilton County 6,10 10.9 (9.0, 13.1) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.5 (-16.3, 27.9)
Hancock County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Hardeman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Hardin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Hawkins County 6,10 10.1 (6.2, 16.0) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Haywood County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Henderson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Henry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Hickman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Houston County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Humphreys County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Jackson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Jefferson County 6,10 17.2 (11.3, 25.3) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Johnson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Knox County 6,10 11.0 (9.3, 13.0) 29 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.5 (-14.0, 17.4)
Lake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Lauderdale County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Lawrence County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Lewis County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Lincoln County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Loudon County 6,10 16.1 (10.2, 24.4) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Macon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Madison County 6,10 11.4 (7.9, 16.1) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Marion County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Marshall County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Maury County 6,10 13.2 (9.1, 18.7) 7 2008-2012
*
*
McMinn County 6,10 16.2 (10.4, 24.3) 5 2008-2012
*
*
McNairy County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Meigs County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Monroe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Montgomery County 6,10 12.1 (8.8, 16.3) 9 2008-2012
*
*
Moore County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Morgan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Obion County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Overton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Perry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Pickett County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Polk County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Putnam County 6,10 12.3 (8.1, 18.0) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Rhea County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Roane County 6,10 13.7 (8.8, 20.8) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Robertson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Rutherford County 6,10 11.8 (9.1, 15.0) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Scott County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Sequatchie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Sevier County 6,10 10.9 (7.4, 15.6) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Shelby County 6,10 12.0 (10.7, 13.5) 61 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-16.3, 20.4)
Smith County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Stewart County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Sullivan County 6,10 12.3 (9.5, 15.7) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Sumner County 6,10 11.3 (8.3, 14.9) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Tipton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Trousdale County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Unicoi County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Union County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Van Buren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Warren County 6,10 13.0 (7.3, 21.6) 3 2008-2012
*
*
Washington County 6,10 14.8 (11.1, 19.4) 11 2008-2012
*
*
Wayne County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Weakley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
White County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Williamson County 6,10 10.6 (7.7, 14.2) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Wilson County 6,10 8.7 (5.9, 12.6) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/05/2015 10:16 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top