Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Texas 6,10 46.7 (46.2, 47.3) 5,763 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.8, 0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 54.1 (53.9, 54.2) 99,801 § falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Webb County 6,10 15.9 (12.6, 19.9) 16 stable stable trend 1.7 (-15.0, 21.6)
Maverick County 6,10 19.6 (12.5, 29.1) 5
*
*
Starr County 6,10 22.4 (15.2, 31.8) 6
*
*
Hidalgo County 6,10 22.4 (20.2, 24.8) 73 stable stable trend -2.0 (-13.0, 10.3)
Uvalde County 6,10 24.6 (14.8, 38.7) 4
*
*
Cameron County 6,10 24.9 (21.9, 28.2) 50 stable stable trend 2.4 (-9.3, 15.6)
Val Verde County 6,10 25.2 (17.3, 35.5) 7
*
*
El Paso County 6,10 26.0 (23.8, 28.4) 102 stable stable trend -4.5 (-16.2, 9.0)
Willacy County 6,10 28.5 (16.5, 46.2) 3
*
*
Deaf Smith County 6,10 33.5 (19.4, 53.9) 3
*
*
Bee County 6,10 33.7 (22.0, 49.8) 5
*
*
Medina County 6,10 34.2 (24.8, 46.1) 9
*
*
Kendall County 6,10 34.5 (24.5, 47.6) 8
*
*
Wilson County 6,10 34.6 (25.0, 47.0) 9
*
*
Robertson County 6,10 34.8 (21.2, 54.9) 4
*
*
Gonzales County 6,10 36.6 (23.1, 55.7) 5
*
*
Lamb County 6,10 36.7 (21.7, 59.3) 4
*
*
Kleberg County 6,10 36.8 (24.5, 53.0) 6
*
*
Bexar County 6,10 36.8 (35.0, 38.7) 313 stable stable trend -5.8 (-11.6, 0.4)
Erath County 6,10 37.0 (26.2, 50.8) 8
*
*
Jim Wells County 6,10 38.3 (27.9, 51.4) 9
*
*
Travis County 6,10 38.9 (36.1, 41.9) 150 falling falling trend -9.5 (-17.5, -0.7)
Lavaca County 6,10 39.1 (26.8, 56.5) 7
*
*
Blanco County 6,10 39.3 (22.2, 67.5) 3
*
*
Nueces County 6,10 39.5 (35.6, 43.7) 77 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.7)
Washington County 6,10 39.8 (29.5, 53.0) 10
*
*
Fort Bend County 6,10 40.0 (36.2, 44.1) 90 stable stable trend -11.7 (-24.7, 3.6)
Gillespie County 6,10 40.1 (29.9, 54.2) 11
*
*
Shelby County 6,10 40.3 (27.6, 57.2) 7
*
*
Hockley County 6,10 40.5 (26.6, 59.2) 5
*
*
DeWitt County 6,10 40.6 (27.2, 59.4) 6
*
*
Tyler County 6,10 41.0 (28.3, 58.6) 7
*
*
Andrews County 6,10 41.1 (23.5, 67.0) 3
*
*
Bosque County 6,10 41.5 (27.6, 61.2) 6
*
*
Austin County 6,10 42.2 (29.8, 58.4) 8
*
*
Hale County 6,10 42.9 (30.7, 58.4) 8
*
*
Wise County 6,10 43.0 (33.4, 54.7) 14
*
*
Atascosa County 6,10 43.2 (32.5, 56.4) 11
*
*
Midland County 6,10 43.4 (36.8, 50.8) 31 stable stable trend 0.4 (-22.8, 30.5)
Grimes County 6,10 43.8 (30.0, 62.1) 7
*
*
Comal County 6,10 44.0 (37.2, 51.6) 32 stable stable trend -6.9 (-18.3, 6.1)
Rockwall County 6,10 44.2 (34.8, 55.2) 16 stable stable trend -13.8 (-33.4, 11.5)
Madison County 6,10 44.2 (26.4, 71.1) 4
*
*
Leon County 6,10 45.1 (30.9, 65.1) 7
*
*
Runnels County 6,10 45.1 (26.7, 73.5) 4
*
*
Walker County 6,10 45.2 (34.8, 57.8) 13
*
*
Titus County 6,10 45.5 (32.1, 62.7) 8
*
*
Guadalupe County 6,10 45.7 (38.8, 53.5) 32 stable stable trend -2.5 (-17.3, 15.0)
Denton County 6,10 45.8 (41.8, 49.9) 110 stable stable trend -6.6 (-18.8, 7.4)
Hays County 6,10 45.9 (38.5, 54.2) 29 stable stable trend 2.2 (-11.3, 17.8)
Collin County 6,10 46.1 (42.5, 49.8) 138 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.6, 1.8)
Harris County 6,10 46.5 (45.0, 48.0) 782 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.9, -0.3)
Wharton County 6,10 46.6 (35.5, 60.2) 12
*
*
Williamson County 6,10 47.0 (42.6, 51.8) 86 stable stable trend -1.9 (-16.5, 15.3)
Lee County 6,10 47.2 (30.7, 70.3) 5
*
*
Falls County 6,10 47.3 (31.4, 69.1) 6
*
*
Live Oak County 6,10 47.3 (28.8, 75.8) 4
*
*
Matagorda County 6,10 47.3 (35.7, 61.9) 11
*
*
Taylor County 6,10 47.4 (40.8, 54.9) 37 stable stable trend -2.7 (-14.1, 10.2)
Lubbock County 6,10 47.5 (42.5, 52.8) 67 stable stable trend -2.7 (-23.0, 23.0)
Terry County 6,10 47.7 (28.6, 76.0) 4
*
*
Brazos County 6,10 47.8 (40.6, 55.8) 32 falling falling trend -17.3 (-28.8, -4.0)
Jones County 6,10 47.9 (31.7, 70.8) 6
*
*
Nolan County 6,10 48.1 (31.3, 71.7) 5
*
*
Houston County 6,10 48.1 (35.0, 65.7) 9
*
*
Gaines County 6,10 48.3 (27.9, 77.1) 3
*
*
Tom Green County 6,10 48.4 (41.1, 56.6) 32 stable stable trend -1.7 (-20.9, 22.0)
Dallas County 6,10 48.8 (46.9, 50.7) 509 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Randall County 6,10 48.8 (41.7, 56.8) 34 stable stable trend -6.3 (-16.6, 5.3)
Freestone County 6,10 49.3 (33.8, 70.2) 7
*
*
Scurry County 6,10 49.5 (31.1, 75.3) 5
*
*
Waller County 6,10 50.0 (36.9, 66.3) 10
*
*
Fayette County 6,10 50.2 (37.2, 67.2) 11
*
*
Jefferson County 6,10 50.8 (45.7, 56.3) 75 stable stable trend 3.0 (-7.7, 14.9)
Caldwell County 6,10 51.6 (38.7, 67.5) 11
*
*
Tarrant County 6,10 51.7 (49.5, 54.0) 422 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.4, -0.5)
Red River County 6,10 51.8 (34.4, 76.9) 6
*
*
Navarro County 6,10 51.8 (40.7, 65.1) 15 stable stable trend 12.4 (-16.6, 51.3)
Eastland County 6,10 51.8 (36.8, 72.1) 8
*
*
Ellis County 6,10 52.0 (44.7, 60.1) 38 stable stable trend -1.0 (-14.1, 14.1)
Brewster County 6,10 52.1 (30.0, 86.1) 3
*
*
San Augustine County 6,10 52.2 (32.5, 83.4) 4
*
*
Jasper County 6,10 52.4 (40.5, 67.0) 13
*
*
Bastrop County 6,10 52.5 (42.8, 63.8) 21 falling falling trend -9.2 (-14.5, -3.6)
Bandera County 6,10 52.6 (37.5, 73.0) 9
*
*
Ector County 6,10 52.9 (45.4, 61.4) 35 stable stable trend -4.9 (-23.4, 18.2)
Hamilton County 6,10 53.2 (31.6, 87.4) 4
*
*
Lampasas County 6,10 53.3 (37.2, 74.7) 7
*
*
Upshur County 6,10 53.4 (41.7, 67.7) 15 stable stable trend 4.6 (-22.1, 40.2)
Cass County 6,10 53.6 (41.3, 69.0) 13
*
*
Victoria County 6,10 53.6 (45.0, 63.4) 28 stable stable trend -5.4 (-18.9, 10.3)
Kerr County 6,10 53.8 (44.2, 65.3) 25 falling falling trend -20.9 (-28.2, -12.9)
Cooke County 6,10 53.8 (42.1, 68.1) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-8.3, 8.1)
Wilbarger County 6,10 54.4 (34.9, 81.9) 5
*
*
Newton County 6,10 54.5 (35.4, 81.3) 5
*
*
McLennan County 6,10 54.5 (49.0, 60.5) 72 stable stable trend 0.6 (-8.8, 11.0)
Smith County 6,10 54.6 (49.1, 60.7) 72 stable stable trend 0.7 (-9.7, 12.4)
Anderson County 6,10 54.7 (43.4, 68.2) 17 stable stable trend -7.6 (-23.6, 11.6)
Hardin County 6,10 54.7 (44.0, 67.4) 18 stable stable trend 2.9 (-24.5, 40.1)
Nacogdoches County 6,10 55.0 (44.2, 67.6) 19 stable stable trend 10.2 (-9.1, 33.7)
Jackson County 6,10 55.2 (36.0, 81.9) 5
*
*
Hood County 6,10 55.9 (46.4, 67.2) 25 stable stable trend -4.3 (-13.0, 5.3)
Van Zandt County 6,10 56.0 (45.7, 68.2) 21 stable stable trend -7.5 (-30.7, 23.6)
Morris County 6,10 56.1 (37.8, 82.0) 6
*
*
Hutchinson County 6,10 56.3 (39.6, 78.1) 8
*
*
Brazoria County 6,10 56.4 (50.9, 62.3) 80 stable stable trend -6.6 (-13.5, 0.9)
Rusk County 6,10 56.5 (45.5, 69.6) 19 stable stable trend -11.6 (-34.0, 18.5)
Galveston County 6,10 56.6 (51.4, 62.1) 91 stable stable trend -0.8 (-8.1, 7.2)
Howard County 6,10 56.6 (42.3, 74.4) 11
*
*
Colorado County 6,10 56.8 (40.4, 78.4) 9
*
*
Milam County 6,10 56.9 (42.3, 75.4) 10
*
*
Johnson County 6,10 57.3 (50.0, 65.4) 45 stable stable trend -5.2 (-13.0, 3.3)
Brown County 6,10 57.4 (45.4, 72.1) 16 stable stable trend -13.7 (-28.5, 4.1)
Camp County 6,10 57.6 (36.2, 87.8) 5
*
*
Hill County 6,10 57.6 (45.2, 72.8) 15 stable stable trend 4.4 (-8.0, 18.4)
Montgomery County 6,10 57.7 (53.2, 62.4) 130 stable stable trend -3.9 (-13.8, 7.1)
Clay County 6,10 58.1 (36.6, 89.6) 5
*
*
Jack County 6,10 58.4 (34.0, 96.2) 3
*
*
Llano County 6,10 58.6 (44.6, 78.3) 13
*
*
Panola County 6,10 58.8 (42.5, 79.8) 9
*
*
Liberty County 6,10 58.9 (48.7, 70.8) 24 stable stable trend -1.3 (-21.1, 23.5)
Burnet County 6,10 59.2 (47.9, 72.8) 20 stable stable trend 6.6 (-33.2, 70.4)
Mitchell County 6,10 59.4 (33.8, 99.7) 3
*
*
Hopkins County 6,10 59.4 (45.8, 76.1) 13
*
*
Kaufman County 6,10 59.6 (50.4, 69.9) 31 stable stable trend 4.9 (-25.9, 48.5)
Karnes County 6,10 60.0 (37.7, 91.7) 5
*
*
San Patricio County 6,10 60.2 (49.6, 72.5) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-19.7, 24.8)
Calhoun County 6,10 60.5 (42.7, 83.7) 8
*
*
Wood County 6,10 61.0 (49.7, 74.6) 23 stable stable trend -7.8 (-20.5, 7.0)
Grayson County 6,10 61.4 (54.0, 69.7) 50 stable stable trend 5.5 (-4.0, 15.9)
Comanche County 6,10 61.6 (42.7, 87.5) 7
*
*
Ward County 6,10 61.9 (38.2, 95.7) 4
*
*
Franklin County 6,10 61.9 (40.6, 92.5) 5
*
*
Parker County 6,10 61.9 (53.5, 71.3) 40 stable stable trend 2.9 (-15.9, 26.1)
Coryell County 6,10 63.3 (50.3, 78.4) 17 stable stable trend 7.6 (-23.1, 50.6)
Moore County 6,10 63.9 (43.3, 90.7) 6
*
*
Gregg County 6,10 63.9 (55.9, 72.7) 48 stable stable trend 6.0 (-11.1, 26.3)
Aransas County 6,10 64.4 (48.7, 84.6) 13
*
*
Lamar County 6,10 65.0 (53.4, 78.7) 22 stable stable trend 6.6 (-11.0, 27.8)
Wichita County 6,10 65.6 (57.7, 74.4) 51 stable stable trend 4.9 (-3.4, 13.9)
Potter County 6,10 65.8 (56.9, 75.7) 40 stable stable trend -6.7 (-19.9, 8.8)
Cherokee County 6,10 65.9 (53.8, 80.0) 21 stable stable trend -8.4 (-17.8, 2.0)
Marion County 6,10 66.0 (44.0, 97.7) 6
*
*
Young County 6,10 66.0 (47.5, 90.1) 9
*
*
Hunt County 6,10 66.0 (56.5, 76.8) 35 stable stable trend -1.8 (-14.1, 12.4)
Montague County 6,10 66.5 (48.4, 89.8) 10
*
*
Callahan County 6,10 66.5 (45.7, 95.0) 7
*
*
Bowie County 6,10 66.7 (57.6, 77.0) 39 falling falling trend -11.3 (-14.7, -7.7)
Orange County 6,10 67.1 (57.3, 78.0) 34 stable stable trend -3.8 (-12.6, 5.9)
Limestone County 6,10 67.7 (50.3, 89.7) 11
*
*
Angelina County 6,10 67.8 (58.0, 78.9) 34 stable stable trend -2.0 (-14.8, 12.7)
Fannin County 6,10 68.7 (54.1, 86.5) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-25.8, 31.4)
Sabine County 6,10 70.5 (49.1, 101.3) 8
*
*
Bell County 6,10 70.8 (64.4, 77.6) 92 stable stable trend -1.1 (-12.2, 11.4)
Chambers County 6,10 70.8 (52.5, 93.2) 10
*
*
Burleson County 6,10 72.0 (52.3, 97.6) 9
*
*
Rains County 6,10 73.6 (49.8, 107.2) 6
*
*
Henderson County 6,10 75.4 (65.7, 86.2) 46 stable stable trend 11.3 (-13.6, 43.3)
Gray County 6,10 75.7 (57.4, 98.6) 12
*
*
San Jacinto County 6,10 76.6 (59.2, 98.1) 14
*
*
Harrison County 6,10 76.9 (65.3, 90.2) 31 stable stable trend 4.5 (-9.9, 21.1)
Stephens County 6,10 78.0 (51.5, 115.6) 6
*
*
Trinity County 6,10 78.3 (58.3, 104.8) 10
*
*
Polk County 6,10 78.8 (65.9, 94.0) 27 stable stable trend -4.3 (-24.3, 21.0)
Palo Pinto County 6,10 80.1 (63.3, 100.5) 16 stable stable trend 8.8 (-7.9, 28.6)
Refugio County 6,10 82.0 (50.8, 127.8) 5
*
*
Coleman County 6,10 83.7 (55.4, 123.8) 6
*
*
Archer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dawson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frio County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/25/2016 7:17 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top