Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Breast, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Texas 6,10 113.1 (112.3, 113.9) 14,301 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 123.0 (122.8, 123.2) 220,205 § stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Anderson County 6,10 106.2 (89.1, 125.7) 29 stable stable trend 7.1 (-26.3, 55.7)
Andrews County 6,10 92.3 (64.1, 128.7) 7
*
*
Angelina County 6,10 113.8 (100.9, 128.0) 58 stable stable trend -2.8 (-12.8, 8.2)
Aransas County 6,10 118.1 (94.6, 146.2) 22 stable stable trend -10.9 (-26.0, 7.3)
Archer County 6,10 63.1 (37.7, 101.5) 4
*
*
Armstrong County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atascosa County 6,10 99.3 (82.2, 119.0) 25 stable stable trend 1.3 (-22.8, 33.0)
Austin County 6,10 115.5 (93.9, 140.9) 21 stable stable trend -18.1 (-40.9, 13.5)
Bailey County 6,10 119.4 (75.2, 180.6) 5
*
*
Bandera County 6,10 88.6 (68.2, 114.4) 14
*
*
Bastrop County 6,10 107.6 (93.6, 123.2) 44 stable stable trend -0.9 (-18.3, 20.2)
Baylor County 6,10 107.2 (56.2, 190.0) 3
*
*
Bee County 6,10 94.9 (72.6, 121.9) 13
*
*
Bell County 6,10 120.3 (112.1, 128.9) 164 stable stable trend -1.4 (-7.4, 5.0)
Bexar County 6,10 111.1 (107.9, 114.3) 964 stable stable trend -3.2 (-9.0, 2.9)
Blanco County 6,10 88.3 (58.1, 130.3) 6
*
*
Borden County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bosque County 6,10 119.1 (93.3, 150.7) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-31.0, 40.3)
Bowie County 6,10 119.5 (106.5, 133.6) 65 stable stable trend -4.0 (-14.9, 8.2)
Brazoria County 6,10 110.9 (103.4, 118.7) 170 stable stable trend -0.8 (-11.5, 11.1)
Brazos County 6,10 118.6 (107.2, 130.8) 81 stable stable trend -8.6 (-22.0, 7.0)
Brewster County 6,10 77.5 (48.1, 119.4) 5
*
*
Briscoe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 6,10 82.6 (50.6, 129.4) 4
*
*
Brown County 6,10 93.4 (76.5, 113.0) 23 stable stable trend -7.8 (-20.9, 7.5)
Burleson County 6,10 78.2 (56.5, 106.3) 9
*
*
Burnet County 6,10 87.7 (72.8, 105.1) 27 stable stable trend -3.3 (-17.3, 13.1)
Caldwell County 6,10 113.4 (93.3, 136.6) 23 stable stable trend -6.5 (-33.1, 30.6)
Calhoun County 6,10 96.0 (72.3, 125.2) 11
*
*
Callahan County 6,10 107.2 (79.9, 142.0) 11
*
*
Cameron County 6,10 92.8 (86.8, 99.0) 184 stable stable trend 5.8 (-0.2, 12.1)
Camp County 6,10 130.1 (95.9, 173.1) 10
*
*
Carson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County 6,10 80.6 (64.2, 100.4) 18 stable stable trend 13.6 (-2.6, 32.4)
Castro County 6,10 94.9 (57.7, 147.5) 4
*
*
Chambers County 6,10 109.7 (88.5, 134.5) 19 rising rising trend 22.6 (17.9, 27.6)
Cherokee County 6,10 120.7 (103.2, 140.4) 36 stable stable trend 7.9 (-6.4, 24.4)
Childress County 6,10 125.4 (78.6, 191.5) 5
*
*
Clay County 6,10 107.5 (76.5, 148.4) 8
*
*
Cochran County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County 6,10 81.0 (54.9, 118.5) 6
*
*
Collin County 6,10 127.2 (122.0, 132.7) 478 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.1, -0.1)
Collingsworth County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colorado County 6,10 78.7 (59.5, 102.8) 12
*
*
Comal County 6,10 123.6 (111.9, 136.2) 88 stable stable trend -2.8 (-12.1, 7.4)
Comanche County 6,10 96.6 (68.9, 132.3) 9
*
*
Concho County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cooke County 6,10 84.5 (68.1, 103.7) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-30.0, 39.4)
Coryell County 6,10 100.0 (84.4, 117.6) 30 stable stable trend -11.4 (-31.3, 14.3)
Cottle County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6,10 132.0 (75.1, 218.6) 3
*
*
Crosby County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 6,10 108.0 (62.6, 173.7) 3
*
*
Dallas County 6,10 122.1 (119.2, 125.1) 1,363 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.7, -0.5)
Dawson County 6,10 117.7 (82.5, 162.9) 8
*
*
DeWitt County 6,10 109.9 (83.7, 141.9) 14
*
*
Deaf Smith County 6,10 85.7 (61.3, 116.6) 8
*
*
Delta County 6,10 105.6 (63.2, 168.8) 4
*
*
Denton County 6,10 126.4 (120.4, 132.6) 367 stable stable trend -2.0 (-7.3, 3.5)
Dickens County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County 6,10 100.9 (67.4, 145.6) 6
*
*
Donley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County 6,10 89.9 (60.9, 128.6) 6
*
*
Eastland County 6,10 91.6 (69.2, 119.6) 13
*
*
Ector County 6,10 119.0 (107.5, 131.4) 80 stable stable trend -4.1 (-19.0, 13.5)
Edwards County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
El Paso County 6,10 97.3 (93.0, 101.8) 383 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.7, 3.2)
Ellis County 6,10 116.4 (105.6, 128.0) 89 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.4, 7.0)
Erath County 6,10 127.7 (105.9, 152.8) 25 stable stable trend 6.9 (-10.6, 27.9)
Falls County 6,10 78.8 (56.9, 106.7) 9
*
*
Fannin County 6,10 98.0 (79.7, 119.6) 21 stable stable trend -1.9 (-15.8, 14.3)
Fayette County 6,10 98.2 (78.5, 122.0) 19 stable stable trend -8.2 (-32.3, 24.7)
Fisher County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fort Bend County 6,10 120.4 (114.4, 126.6) 338 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.1, 2.6)
Franklin County 6,10 95.2 (65.8, 134.5) 7
*
*
Freestone County 6,10 122.2 (95.0, 155.1) 15 stable stable trend 8.3 (-14.9, 37.9)
Frio County 6,10 117.7 (85.5, 158.0) 9
*
*
Gaines County 6,10 93.4 (64.5, 130.4) 7
*
*
Galveston County 6,10 125.4 (117.7, 133.6) 203 stable stable trend -6.0 (-17.2, 6.6)
Garza County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gillespie County 6,10 109.1 (87.6, 134.9) 23 stable stable trend -7.3 (-21.2, 9.0)
Glasscock County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County 6,10 108.3 (72.5, 158.8) 6
*
*
Gonzales County 6,10 69.9 (50.0, 95.4) 8
*
*
Gray County 6,10 139.5 (111.1, 173.0) 18 stable stable trend 2.7 (-22.8, 36.8)
Grayson County 6,10 108.9 (98.5, 120.1) 86 stable stable trend -1.3 (-17.7, 18.4)
Gregg County 6,10 121.5 (110.0, 133.8) 85 stable stable trend -0.7 (-16.4, 17.8)
Grimes County 6,10 94.0 (72.7, 119.9) 14
*
*
Guadalupe County 6,10 116.0 (105.1, 127.9) 83 stable stable trend -1.2 (-12.7, 11.9)
Hale County 6,10 91.1 (72.1, 113.6) 16 stable stable trend -11.8 (-32.3, 14.9)
Hall County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 6,10 98.1 (64.4, 145.3) 7
*
*
Hansford County 6,10 137.3 (84.6, 211.3) 4
*
*
Hardeman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 6,10 98.3 (83.5, 115.2) 32 stable stable trend 0.7 (-13.8, 17.7)
Harris County 6,10 118.9 (116.6, 121.1) 2,225 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.7, 2.3)
Harrison County 6,10 114.9 (100.0, 131.5) 44 stable stable trend -4.6 (-24.6, 20.7)
Hartley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 6,10 83.7 (45.3, 143.8) 3
*
*
Hays County 6,10 114.0 (102.8, 126.0) 79 stable stable trend -0.6 (-10.5, 10.3)
Hemphill County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 6,10 104.2 (92.1, 117.5) 58 stable stable trend -3.4 (-14.9, 9.5)
Hidalgo County 6,10 86.1 (81.6, 90.7) 285 stable stable trend -0.7 (-7.1, 6.0)
Hill County 6,10 118.8 (98.8, 141.7) 27 stable stable trend -1.8 (-27.7, 33.5)
Hockley County 6,10 103.7 (80.4, 131.9) 14
*
*
Hood County 6,10 118.4 (102.3, 136.5) 45 stable stable trend -0.1 (-7.2, 7.6)
Hopkins County 6,10 90.3 (73.1, 110.7) 20 stable stable trend 9.2 (-30.6, 71.9)
Houston County 6,10 92.3 (72.0, 117.4) 15 stable stable trend -7.3 (-33.9, 29.8)
Howard County 6,10 101.5 (80.8, 125.9) 17 stable stable trend 3.8 (-11.6, 21.9)
Hudspeth County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hunt County 6,10 102.7 (90.5, 116.2) 53 stable stable trend 5.4 (-10.1, 23.5)
Hutchinson County 6,10 90.9 (69.6, 117.1) 13
*
*
Irion County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County 6,10 92.5 (58.4, 140.4) 5
*
*
Jackson County 6,10 81.2 (57.6, 112.3) 8
*
*
Jasper County 6,10 96.5 (79.0, 117.0) 22 stable stable trend 1.3 (-19.1, 26.8)
Jeff Davis County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6,10 109.0 (101.2, 117.1) 152 stable stable trend -2.4 (-10.1, 5.9)
Jim Hogg County 6,10 115.6 (65.8, 188.6) 3
*
*
Jim Wells County 6,10 87.1 (70.2, 106.8) 19 stable stable trend -3.9 (-26.9, 26.4)
Johnson County 6,10 109.5 (99.5, 120.3) 90 stable stable trend 0.3 (-7.7, 9.0)
Jones County 6,10 113.6 (86.1, 147.9) 12
*
*
Karnes County 6,10 95.6 (66.7, 133.5) 8
*
*
Kaufman County 6,10 117.9 (105.0, 131.9) 63 stable stable trend 1.6 (-17.6, 25.3)
Kendall County 6,10 120.4 (100.4, 143.5) 28 stable stable trend 2.9 (-12.5, 21.1)
Kenedy County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kerr County 6,10 101.2 (86.3, 118.2) 40 stable stable trend 4.9 (-15.5, 30.3)
Kimble County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kleberg County 6,10 118.8 (94.9, 146.9) 18 stable stable trend -14.7 (-36.8, 15.0)
Knox County 6,10 143.9 (82.5, 236.2) 4
*
*
La Salle County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 6,10 128.7 (111.3, 148.1) 42 stable stable trend -3.1 (-19.1, 16.0)
Lamb County 6,10 85.8 (59.6, 120.0) 7
*
*
Lampasas County 6,10 94.4 (71.5, 122.9) 12
*
*
Lavaca County 6,10 118.1 (92.7, 149.0) 17 stable stable trend 33.6 (-25.0, 138.2)
Lee County 6,10 95.6 (69.4, 128.7) 9
*
*
Leon County 6,10 117.4 (89.2, 152.3) 14
*
*
Liberty County 6,10 95.5 (82.6, 109.9) 40 stable stable trend 4.1 (-2.0, 10.6)
Limestone County 6,10 95.3 (73.3, 122.1) 14
*
*
Lipscomb County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County 6,10 90.3 (61.8, 129.2) 7
*
*
Llano County 6,10 85.7 (63.8, 114.1) 15 stable stable trend -18.9 (-58.0, 56.6)
Loving County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lubbock County 6,10 107.6 (99.9, 115.7) 149 stable stable trend -0.0 (-13.3, 15.3)
Lynn County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6,10 113.6 (79.5, 157.8) 8
*
*
Marion County 6,10 93.7 (63.0, 135.5) 7
*
*
Martin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 6,10 97.3 (53.4, 171.9) 3
*
*
Matagorda County 6,10 104.1 (85.7, 125.4) 23 stable stable trend -2.0 (-17.4, 16.4)
Maverick County 6,10 92.2 (76.3, 110.4) 24 stable stable trend 7.8 (-12.0, 32.2)
McCulloch County 6,10 92.4 (59.3, 139.0) 6
*
*
McLennan County 6,10 112.3 (104.1, 121.0) 143 stable stable trend -1.4 (-8.6, 6.4)
McMullen County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Medina County 6,10 99.5 (82.7, 118.7) 26 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.1, 4.6)
Menard County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Midland County 6,10 105.3 (94.8, 116.6) 76 stable stable trend -1.3 (-17.5, 18.2)
Milam County 6,10 109.4 (87.1, 135.9) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-12.7, 12.1)
Mills County 6,10 98.9 (59.1, 161.2) 4
*
*
Mitchell County 6,10 120.2 (78.4, 177.6) 6
*
*
Montague County 6,10 71.0 (52.1, 95.2) 10
*
*
Montgomery County 6,10 124.2 (117.9, 130.8) 300 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.9, 6.0)
Moore County 6,10 112.0 (83.9, 146.2) 11
*
*
Morris County 6,10 117.0 (85.9, 156.4) 10
*
*
Motley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nacogdoches County 6,10 93.6 (79.1, 109.9) 31 stable stable trend -3.0 (-23.0, 22.3)
Navarro County 6,10 103.5 (86.9, 122.5) 29 stable stable trend 5.3 (-13.3, 27.8)
Newton County 6,10 64.6 (42.3, 95.2) 6
*
*
Nolan County 6,10 129.5 (98.3, 167.9) 12
*
*
Nueces County 6,10 110.4 (103.7, 117.5) 206 stable stable trend -8.0 (-15.4, 0.1)
Ochiltree County 6,10 92.5 (57.7, 140.2) 4
*
*
Oldham County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County 6,10 112.3 (99.2, 126.7) 55 stable stable trend -2.6 (-17.5, 15.0)
Palo Pinto County 6,10 116.6 (94.4, 142.7) 21 stable stable trend 14.2 (-13.6, 50.8)
Panola County 6,10 88.7 (69.3, 112.4) 15 stable stable trend 5.0 (-18.7, 35.6)
Parker County 6,10 138.3 (125.5, 152.1) 90 stable stable trend 1.8 (-4.8, 9.0)
Parmer County 6,10 94.6 (59.5, 142.3) 5
*
*
Pecos County 6,10 86.7 (58.5, 123.8) 6
*
*
Polk County 6,10 115.9 (99.0, 135.1) 37 stable stable trend 4.7 (-17.2, 32.4)
Potter County 6,10 110.2 (98.5, 123.0) 66 stable stable trend -0.8 (-11.2, 10.7)
Presidio County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rains County 6,10 82.6 (56.9, 118.0) 7
*
*
Randall County 6,10 118.0 (106.6, 130.4) 80 stable stable trend 2.0 (-10.6, 16.4)
Reagan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River County 6,10 102.9 (76.1, 137.5) 11
*
*
Reeves County 6,10 91.4 (60.6, 132.7) 6
*
*
Refugio County 6,10 107.1 (69.3, 159.9) 6
*
*
Roberts County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 6,10 124.0 (95.2, 159.2) 13
*
*
Rockwall County 6,10 132.2 (116.6, 149.3) 54 stable stable trend -5.4 (-13.7, 3.7)
Runnels County 6,10 105.9 (75.1, 146.6) 8
*
*
Rusk County 6,10 103.3 (87.5, 121.2) 32 stable stable trend -4.0 (-13.9, 6.9)
Sabine County 6,10 90.5 (61.4, 130.4) 8
*
*
San Augustine County 6,10 71.5 (40.9, 116.5) 4
*
*
San Jacinto County 6,10 108.6 (86.2, 135.3) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-17.5, 24.6)
San Patricio County 6,10 106.3 (91.5, 122.9) 38 stable stable trend -6.2 (-14.8, 3.4)
San Saba County 6,10 66.1 (36.6, 115.6) 3
*
*
Schleicher County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scurry County 6,10 139.9 (106.3, 180.9) 13
*
*
Shackelford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 6,10 90.5 (69.7, 115.6) 14
*
*
Sherman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County 6,10 128.6 (119.6, 138.0) 159 falling falling trend -8.7 (-9.7, -7.6)
Somervell County 6,10 99.7 (63.7, 149.4) 5
*
*
Starr County 6,10 86.4 (71.6, 103.2) 24 stable stable trend 7.5 (-2.0, 17.9)
Stephens County 6,10 79.6 (49.8, 121.9) 5
*
*
Sterling County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 6,10 94.4 (58.8, 144.9) 5
*
*
Tarrant County 6,10 120.5 (117.2, 123.8) 1,060 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.4, 5.1)
Taylor County 6,10 122.3 (110.9, 134.6) 88 stable stable trend 1.4 (-11.6, 16.4)
Terrell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County 6,10 91.7 (61.6, 131.6) 6
*
*
Throckmorton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Titus County 6,10 88.7 (69.0, 112.2) 14
*
*
Tom Green County 6,10 109.2 (97.8, 121.7) 69 stable stable trend -1.3 (-12.0, 10.7)
Travis County 6,10 120.1 (115.4, 124.9) 530 stable stable trend -4.2 (-13.3, 6.0)
Trinity County 6,10 111.8 (84.0, 146.8) 12
*
*
Tyler County 6,10 78.4 (58.9, 103.1) 12
*
*
Upshur County 6,10 97.7 (80.8, 117.3) 25 stable stable trend 7.1 (-16.0, 36.5)
Upton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Uvalde County 6,10 88.3 (67.3, 113.6) 13
*
*
Val Verde County 6,10 72.0 (57.8, 88.6) 18 stable stable trend 22.6 (-12.3, 71.5)
Van Zandt County 6,10 109.4 (94.5, 126.3) 41 stable stable trend 2.4 (-19.7, 30.7)
Victoria County 6,10 107.4 (94.8, 121.2) 55 stable stable trend -4.9 (-10.7, 1.2)
Walker County 6,10 130.3 (111.3, 151.8) 35 stable stable trend 0.7 (-21.9, 29.9)
Waller County 6,10 91.3 (73.0, 112.7) 18 stable stable trend -1.7 (-17.8, 17.7)
Ward County 6,10 122.1 (85.8, 169.0) 8
*
*
Washington County 6,10 128.3 (106.7, 153.2) 28 stable stable trend -14.0 (-34.4, 12.8)
Webb County 6,10 86.0 (78.1, 94.5) 89 stable stable trend -1.5 (-9.9, 7.6)
Wharton County 6,10 83.2 (67.5, 101.7) 21 stable stable trend 11.2 (-19.1, 53.0)
Wheeler County 6,10 108.8 (66.6, 170.8) 4
*
*
Wichita County 6,10 105.6 (95.0, 117.2) 75 stable stable trend -1.8 (-15.4, 14.0)
Wilbarger County 6,10 117.0 (86.6, 155.4) 10
*
*
Willacy County 6,10 76.3 (54.1, 104.5) 8
*
*
Williamson County 6,10 120.8 (114.0, 127.9) 245 stable stable trend -3.4 (-8.8, 2.4)
Wilson County 6,10 97.5 (80.6, 117.0) 25 stable stable trend -7.4 (-16.8, 3.1)
Winkler County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wise County 6,10 104.7 (89.5, 121.8) 35 stable stable trend 4.2 (-15.0, 27.7)
Wood County 6,10 100.5 (85.4, 118.0) 37 stable stable trend 2.6 (-14.1, 22.5)
Yoakum County 6,10 115.8 (72.1, 175.6) 4
*
*
Young County 6,10 109.4 (84.4, 140.0) 15 stable stable trend -9.7 (-47.1, 54.3)
Zapata County 6,10 82.0 (52.6, 121.3) 5
*
*
Zavala County 6,10 64.8 (39.1, 101.1) 4
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/28/2016 5:55 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top