Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Breast, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Texas 6,10 113.1 (112.3, 113.9) 14,301 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 123.0 (122.8, 123.2) 220,205 § stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Archer County 6,10 63.1 (37.7, 101.5) 4
*
*
Newton County 6,10 64.6 (42.3, 95.2) 6
*
*
Zavala County 6,10 64.8 (39.1, 101.1) 4
*
*
San Saba County 6,10 66.1 (36.6, 115.6) 3
*
*
Gonzales County 6,10 69.9 (50.0, 95.4) 8
*
*
Montague County 6,10 71.0 (52.1, 95.2) 10
*
*
San Augustine County 6,10 71.5 (40.9, 116.5) 4
*
*
Val Verde County 6,10 72.0 (57.8, 88.6) 18 stable stable trend 22.6 (-12.3, 71.5)
Willacy County 6,10 76.3 (54.1, 104.5) 8
*
*
Brewster County 6,10 77.5 (48.1, 119.4) 5
*
*
Burleson County 6,10 78.2 (56.5, 106.3) 9
*
*
Tyler County 6,10 78.4 (58.9, 103.1) 12
*
*
Colorado County 6,10 78.7 (59.5, 102.8) 12
*
*
Falls County 6,10 78.8 (56.9, 106.7) 9
*
*
Stephens County 6,10 79.6 (49.8, 121.9) 5
*
*
Cass County 6,10 80.6 (64.2, 100.4) 18 stable stable trend 13.6 (-2.6, 32.4)
Coleman County 6,10 81.0 (54.9, 118.5) 6
*
*
Jackson County 6,10 81.2 (57.6, 112.3) 8
*
*
Zapata County 6,10 82.0 (52.6, 121.3) 5
*
*
Rains County 6,10 82.6 (56.9, 118.0) 7
*
*
Brooks County 6,10 82.6 (50.6, 129.4) 4
*
*
Wharton County 6,10 83.2 (67.5, 101.7) 21 stable stable trend 11.2 (-19.1, 53.0)
Haskell County 6,10 83.7 (45.3, 143.8) 3
*
*
Cooke County 6,10 84.5 (68.1, 103.7) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-30.0, 39.4)
Deaf Smith County 6,10 85.7 (61.3, 116.6) 8
*
*
Llano County 6,10 85.7 (63.8, 114.1) 15 stable stable trend -18.9 (-58.0, 56.6)
Lamb County 6,10 85.8 (59.6, 120.0) 7
*
*
Webb County 6,10 86.0 (78.1, 94.5) 89 stable stable trend -1.5 (-9.9, 7.6)
Hidalgo County 6,10 86.1 (81.6, 90.7) 285 stable stable trend -0.7 (-7.1, 6.0)
Starr County 6,10 86.4 (71.6, 103.2) 24 stable stable trend 7.5 (-2.0, 17.9)
Pecos County 6,10 86.7 (58.5, 123.8) 6
*
*
Jim Wells County 6,10 87.1 (70.2, 106.8) 19 stable stable trend -3.9 (-26.9, 26.4)
Burnet County 6,10 87.7 (72.8, 105.1) 27 stable stable trend -3.3 (-17.3, 13.1)
Uvalde County 6,10 88.3 (67.3, 113.6) 13
*
*
Blanco County 6,10 88.3 (58.1, 130.3) 6
*
*
Bandera County 6,10 88.6 (68.2, 114.4) 14
*
*
Panola County 6,10 88.7 (69.3, 112.4) 15 stable stable trend 5.0 (-18.7, 35.6)
Titus County 6,10 88.7 (69.0, 112.2) 14
*
*
Duval County 6,10 89.9 (60.9, 128.6) 6
*
*
Live Oak County 6,10 90.3 (61.8, 129.2) 7
*
*
Hopkins County 6,10 90.3 (73.1, 110.7) 20 stable stable trend 9.2 (-30.6, 71.9)
Shelby County 6,10 90.5 (69.7, 115.6) 14
*
*
Sabine County 6,10 90.5 (61.4, 130.4) 8
*
*
Hutchinson County 6,10 90.9 (69.6, 117.1) 13
*
*
Hale County 6,10 91.1 (72.1, 113.6) 16 stable stable trend -11.8 (-32.3, 14.9)
Waller County 6,10 91.3 (73.0, 112.7) 18 stable stable trend -1.7 (-17.8, 17.7)
Reeves County 6,10 91.4 (60.6, 132.7) 6
*
*
Eastland County 6,10 91.6 (69.2, 119.6) 13
*
*
Terry County 6,10 91.7 (61.6, 131.6) 6
*
*
Maverick County 6,10 92.2 (76.3, 110.4) 24 stable stable trend 7.8 (-12.0, 32.2)
Houston County 6,10 92.3 (72.0, 117.4) 15 stable stable trend -7.3 (-33.9, 29.8)
Andrews County 6,10 92.3 (64.1, 128.7) 7
*
*
McCulloch County 6,10 92.4 (59.3, 139.0) 6
*
*
Jack County 6,10 92.5 (58.4, 140.4) 5
*
*
Ochiltree County 6,10 92.5 (57.7, 140.2) 4
*
*
Cameron County 6,10 92.8 (86.8, 99.0) 184 stable stable trend 5.8 (-0.2, 12.1)
Brown County 6,10 93.4 (76.5, 113.0) 23 stable stable trend -7.8 (-20.9, 7.5)
Gaines County 6,10 93.4 (64.5, 130.4) 7
*
*
Nacogdoches County 6,10 93.6 (79.1, 109.9) 31 stable stable trend -3.0 (-23.0, 22.3)
Marion County 6,10 93.7 (63.0, 135.5) 7
*
*
Grimes County 6,10 94.0 (72.7, 119.9) 14
*
*
Swisher County 6,10 94.4 (58.8, 144.9) 5
*
*
Lampasas County 6,10 94.4 (71.5, 122.9) 12
*
*
Parmer County 6,10 94.6 (59.5, 142.3) 5
*
*
Bee County 6,10 94.9 (72.6, 121.9) 13
*
*
Castro County 6,10 94.9 (57.7, 147.5) 4
*
*
Franklin County 6,10 95.2 (65.8, 134.5) 7
*
*
Limestone County 6,10 95.3 (73.3, 122.1) 14
*
*
Liberty County 6,10 95.5 (82.6, 109.9) 40 stable stable trend 4.1 (-2.0, 10.6)
Karnes County 6,10 95.6 (66.7, 133.5) 8
*
*
Lee County 6,10 95.6 (69.4, 128.7) 9
*
*
Calhoun County 6,10 96.0 (72.3, 125.2) 11
*
*
Jasper County 6,10 96.5 (79.0, 117.0) 22 stable stable trend 1.3 (-19.1, 26.8)
Comanche County 6,10 96.6 (68.9, 132.3) 9
*
*
El Paso County 6,10 97.3 (93.0, 101.8) 383 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.7, 3.2)
Mason County 6,10 97.3 (53.4, 171.9) 3
*
*
Wilson County 6,10 97.5 (80.6, 117.0) 25 stable stable trend -7.4 (-16.8, 3.1)
Upshur County 6,10 97.7 (80.8, 117.3) 25 stable stable trend 7.1 (-16.0, 36.5)
Fannin County 6,10 98.0 (79.7, 119.6) 21 stable stable trend -1.9 (-15.8, 14.3)
Hamilton County 6,10 98.1 (64.4, 145.3) 7
*
*
Fayette County 6,10 98.2 (78.5, 122.0) 19 stable stable trend -8.2 (-32.3, 24.7)
Hardin County 6,10 98.3 (83.5, 115.2) 32 stable stable trend 0.7 (-13.8, 17.7)
Mills County 6,10 98.9 (59.1, 161.2) 4
*
*
Atascosa County 6,10 99.3 (82.2, 119.0) 25 stable stable trend 1.3 (-22.8, 33.0)
Medina County 6,10 99.5 (82.7, 118.7) 26 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.1, 4.6)
Somervell County 6,10 99.7 (63.7, 149.4) 5
*
*
Coryell County 6,10 100.0 (84.4, 117.6) 30 stable stable trend -11.4 (-31.3, 14.3)
Wood County 6,10 100.5 (85.4, 118.0) 37 stable stable trend 2.6 (-14.1, 22.5)
Dimmit County 6,10 100.9 (67.4, 145.6) 6
*
*
Kerr County 6,10 101.2 (86.3, 118.2) 40 stable stable trend 4.9 (-15.5, 30.3)
Howard County 6,10 101.5 (80.8, 125.9) 17 stable stable trend 3.8 (-11.6, 21.9)
Hunt County 6,10 102.7 (90.5, 116.2) 53 stable stable trend 5.4 (-10.1, 23.5)
Red River County 6,10 102.9 (76.1, 137.5) 11
*
*
Rusk County 6,10 103.3 (87.5, 121.2) 32 stable stable trend -4.0 (-13.9, 6.9)
Navarro County 6,10 103.5 (86.9, 122.5) 29 stable stable trend 5.3 (-13.3, 27.8)
Hockley County 6,10 103.7 (80.4, 131.9) 14
*
*
Matagorda County 6,10 104.1 (85.7, 125.4) 23 stable stable trend -2.0 (-17.4, 16.4)
Henderson County 6,10 104.2 (92.1, 117.5) 58 stable stable trend -3.4 (-14.9, 9.5)
Wise County 6,10 104.7 (89.5, 121.8) 35 stable stable trend 4.2 (-15.0, 27.7)
Midland County 6,10 105.3 (94.8, 116.6) 76 stable stable trend -1.3 (-17.5, 18.2)
Delta County 6,10 105.6 (63.2, 168.8) 4
*
*
Wichita County 6,10 105.6 (95.0, 117.2) 75 stable stable trend -1.8 (-15.4, 14.0)
Runnels County 6,10 105.9 (75.1, 146.6) 8
*
*
Anderson County 6,10 106.2 (89.1, 125.7) 29 stable stable trend 7.1 (-26.3, 55.7)
San Patricio County 6,10 106.3 (91.5, 122.9) 38 stable stable trend -6.2 (-14.8, 3.4)
Refugio County 6,10 107.1 (69.3, 159.9) 6
*
*
Baylor County 6,10 107.2 (56.2, 190.0) 3
*
*
Callahan County 6,10 107.2 (79.9, 142.0) 11
*
*
Victoria County 6,10 107.4 (94.8, 121.2) 55 stable stable trend -4.9 (-10.7, 1.2)
Clay County 6,10 107.5 (76.5, 148.4) 8
*
*
Bastrop County 6,10 107.6 (93.6, 123.2) 44 stable stable trend -0.9 (-18.3, 20.2)
Lubbock County 6,10 107.6 (99.9, 115.7) 149 stable stable trend -0.0 (-13.3, 15.3)
Dallam County 6,10 108.0 (62.6, 173.7) 3
*
*
Goliad County 6,10 108.3 (72.5, 158.8) 6
*
*
San Jacinto County 6,10 108.6 (86.2, 135.3) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-17.5, 24.6)
Wheeler County 6,10 108.8 (66.6, 170.8) 4
*
*
Grayson County 6,10 108.9 (98.5, 120.1) 86 stable stable trend -1.3 (-17.7, 18.4)
Jefferson County 6,10 109.0 (101.2, 117.1) 152 stable stable trend -2.4 (-10.1, 5.9)
Gillespie County 6,10 109.1 (87.6, 134.9) 23 stable stable trend -7.3 (-21.2, 9.0)
Tom Green County 6,10 109.2 (97.8, 121.7) 69 stable stable trend -1.3 (-12.0, 10.7)
Milam County 6,10 109.4 (87.1, 135.9) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-12.7, 12.1)
Young County 6,10 109.4 (84.4, 140.0) 15 stable stable trend -9.7 (-47.1, 54.3)
Van Zandt County 6,10 109.4 (94.5, 126.3) 41 stable stable trend 2.4 (-19.7, 30.7)
Johnson County 6,10 109.5 (99.5, 120.3) 90 stable stable trend 0.3 (-7.7, 9.0)
Chambers County 6,10 109.7 (88.5, 134.5) 19 rising rising trend 22.6 (17.9, 27.6)
DeWitt County 6,10 109.9 (83.7, 141.9) 14
*
*
Potter County 6,10 110.2 (98.5, 123.0) 66 stable stable trend -0.8 (-11.2, 10.7)
Nueces County 6,10 110.4 (103.7, 117.5) 206 stable stable trend -8.0 (-15.4, 0.1)
Brazoria County 6,10 110.9 (103.4, 118.7) 170 stable stable trend -0.8 (-11.5, 11.1)
Bexar County 6,10 111.1 (107.9, 114.3) 964 stable stable trend -3.2 (-9.0, 2.9)
Trinity County 6,10 111.8 (84.0, 146.8) 12
*
*
Moore County 6,10 112.0 (83.9, 146.2) 11
*
*
Orange County 6,10 112.3 (99.2, 126.7) 55 stable stable trend -2.6 (-17.5, 15.0)
McLennan County 6,10 112.3 (104.1, 121.0) 143 stable stable trend -1.4 (-8.6, 6.4)
Caldwell County 6,10 113.4 (93.3, 136.6) 23 stable stable trend -6.5 (-33.1, 30.6)
Jones County 6,10 113.6 (86.1, 147.9) 12
*
*
Madison County 6,10 113.6 (79.5, 157.8) 8
*
*
Angelina County 6,10 113.8 (100.9, 128.0) 58 stable stable trend -2.8 (-12.8, 8.2)
Hays County 6,10 114.0 (102.8, 126.0) 79 stable stable trend -0.6 (-10.5, 10.3)
Harrison County 6,10 114.9 (100.0, 131.5) 44 stable stable trend -4.6 (-24.6, 20.7)
Austin County 6,10 115.5 (93.9, 140.9) 21 stable stable trend -18.1 (-40.9, 13.5)
Jim Hogg County 6,10 115.6 (65.8, 188.6) 3
*
*
Yoakum County 6,10 115.8 (72.1, 175.6) 4
*
*
Polk County 6,10 115.9 (99.0, 135.1) 37 stable stable trend 4.7 (-17.2, 32.4)
Guadalupe County 6,10 116.0 (105.1, 127.9) 83 stable stable trend -1.2 (-12.7, 11.9)
Ellis County 6,10 116.4 (105.6, 128.0) 89 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.4, 7.0)
Palo Pinto County 6,10 116.6 (94.4, 142.7) 21 stable stable trend 14.2 (-13.6, 50.8)
Morris County 6,10 117.0 (85.9, 156.4) 10
*
*
Wilbarger County 6,10 117.0 (86.6, 155.4) 10
*
*
Leon County 6,10 117.4 (89.2, 152.3) 14
*
*
Frio County 6,10 117.7 (85.5, 158.0) 9
*
*
Dawson County 6,10 117.7 (82.5, 162.9) 8
*
*
Kaufman County 6,10 117.9 (105.0, 131.9) 63 stable stable trend 1.6 (-17.6, 25.3)
Randall County 6,10 118.0 (106.6, 130.4) 80 stable stable trend 2.0 (-10.6, 16.4)
Aransas County 6,10 118.1 (94.6, 146.2) 22 stable stable trend -10.9 (-26.0, 7.3)
Lavaca County 6,10 118.1 (92.7, 149.0) 17 stable stable trend 33.6 (-25.0, 138.2)
Hood County 6,10 118.4 (102.3, 136.5) 45 stable stable trend -0.1 (-7.2, 7.6)
Brazos County 6,10 118.6 (107.2, 130.8) 81 stable stable trend -8.6 (-22.0, 7.0)
Hill County 6,10 118.8 (98.8, 141.7) 27 stable stable trend -1.8 (-27.7, 33.5)
Kleberg County 6,10 118.8 (94.9, 146.9) 18 stable stable trend -14.7 (-36.8, 15.0)
Harris County 6,10 118.9 (116.6, 121.1) 2,225 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.7, 2.3)
Ector County 6,10 119.0 (107.5, 131.4) 80 stable stable trend -4.1 (-19.0, 13.5)
Bosque County 6,10 119.1 (93.3, 150.7) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-31.0, 40.3)
Bailey County 6,10 119.4 (75.2, 180.6) 5
*
*
Bowie County 6,10 119.5 (106.5, 133.6) 65 stable stable trend -4.0 (-14.9, 8.2)
Travis County 6,10 120.1 (115.4, 124.9) 530 stable stable trend -4.2 (-13.3, 6.0)
Mitchell County 6,10 120.2 (78.4, 177.6) 6
*
*
Bell County 6,10 120.3 (112.1, 128.9) 164 stable stable trend -1.4 (-7.4, 5.0)
Kendall County 6,10 120.4 (100.4, 143.5) 28 stable stable trend 2.9 (-12.5, 21.1)
Fort Bend County 6,10 120.4 (114.4, 126.6) 338 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.1, 2.6)
Tarrant County 6,10 120.5 (117.2, 123.8) 1,060 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.4, 5.1)
Cherokee County 6,10 120.7 (103.2, 140.4) 36 stable stable trend 7.9 (-6.4, 24.4)
Williamson County 6,10 120.8 (114.0, 127.9) 245 stable stable trend -3.4 (-8.8, 2.4)
Gregg County 6,10 121.5 (110.0, 133.8) 85 stable stable trend -0.7 (-16.4, 17.8)
Dallas County 6,10 122.1 (119.2, 125.1) 1,363 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.7, -0.5)
Ward County 6,10 122.1 (85.8, 169.0) 8
*
*
Freestone County 6,10 122.2 (95.0, 155.1) 15 stable stable trend 8.3 (-14.9, 37.9)
Taylor County 6,10 122.3 (110.9, 134.6) 88 stable stable trend 1.4 (-11.6, 16.4)
Comal County 6,10 123.6 (111.9, 136.2) 88 stable stable trend -2.8 (-12.1, 7.4)
Robertson County 6,10 124.0 (95.2, 159.2) 13
*
*
Montgomery County 6,10 124.2 (117.9, 130.8) 300 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.9, 6.0)
Childress County 6,10 125.4 (78.6, 191.5) 5
*
*
Galveston County 6,10 125.4 (117.7, 133.6) 203 stable stable trend -6.0 (-17.2, 6.6)
Denton County 6,10 126.4 (120.4, 132.6) 367 stable stable trend -2.0 (-7.3, 3.5)
Collin County 6,10 127.2 (122.0, 132.7) 478 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.1, -0.1)
Erath County 6,10 127.7 (105.9, 152.8) 25 stable stable trend 6.9 (-10.6, 27.9)
Washington County 6,10 128.3 (106.7, 153.2) 28 stable stable trend -14.0 (-34.4, 12.8)
Smith County 6,10 128.6 (119.6, 138.0) 159 falling falling trend -8.7 (-9.7, -7.6)
Lamar County 6,10 128.7 (111.3, 148.1) 42 stable stable trend -3.1 (-19.1, 16.0)
Nolan County 6,10 129.5 (98.3, 167.9) 12
*
*
Camp County 6,10 130.1 (95.9, 173.1) 10
*
*
Walker County 6,10 130.3 (111.3, 151.8) 35 stable stable trend 0.7 (-21.9, 29.9)
Crockett County 6,10 132.0 (75.1, 218.6) 3
*
*
Rockwall County 6,10 132.2 (116.6, 149.3) 54 stable stable trend -5.4 (-13.7, 3.7)
Hansford County 6,10 137.3 (84.6, 211.3) 4
*
*
Parker County 6,10 138.3 (125.5, 152.1) 90 stable stable trend 1.8 (-4.8, 9.0)
Gray County 6,10 139.5 (111.1, 173.0) 18 stable stable trend 2.7 (-22.8, 36.8)
Scurry County 6,10 139.9 (106.3, 180.9) 13
*
*
Knox County 6,10 143.9 (82.5, 236.2) 4
*
*
Armstrong County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/29/2016 12:29 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top