Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Utah by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Breast, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent AAPC
sort sort by trenddescending
Utah 3,8 112.0 (109.3, 114.9) 1,265 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 122.7 (122.4, 122.9) 216,052 § 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Garfield County 7 146.6 (90.3, 226.6) 5 2007-2011 * *
Davis County 7,8 120.3 (111.5, 129.4) 145 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.2)
Summit County 7,8 120.2 (95.0, 150.0) 20 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1 (-1.4, 3.4)
Cache County 7,8 119.5 (104.4, 136.1) 46 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
Box Elder County 7,8 117.8 (98.3, 139.9) 26 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Utah County 7,8 117.1 (109.6, 125.0) 183 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.3)
Grand County 7,8 116.3 (77.2, 168.6) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 35.6 (-11.8, 108.5)
Salt Lake County 7,8 114.9 (110.4, 119.5) 503 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Tooele County 7,8 112.9 (93.6, 134.8) 25 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.2)
Millard County 7,8 111.4 (77.7, 154.9) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 3.0)
Carbon County 7,8 108.3 (82.9, 139.3) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.8)
Sevier County 7,8 105.1 (77.9, 138.7) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.5, 4.0)
Iron County 7,8 104.2 (84.0, 127.6) 19 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1 (-2.9, 0.9)
Weber County 7,8 103.8 (95.2, 113.0) 109 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Emery County 7 103.3 (67.8, 150.6) 6 2007-2011 * *
Washington County 7,8 102.6 (92.2, 114.0) 79 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Wasatch County 7,8 102.5 (74.4, 137.3) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 4.0)
Uintah County 7,8 101.9 (78.9, 129.3) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 0.9)
Sanpete County 7,8 99.2 (74.5, 129.3) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.3)
Duchesne County 7,8 91.3 (63.2, 127.1) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.4)
Juab County 7,8 81.4 (47.0, 130.2) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.6, 0.9)
Kane County 7 78.5 (46.2, 127.3) 4 2007-2011 * *
San Juan County 7,8 51.4 (30.2, 81.5) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.6, 3.6)
Beaver County 7
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Daggett County 7
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Morgan County 7
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Piute County 7
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Rich County 7
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Wayne County 7
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/20/2014 1:57 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2013 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2013 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2013 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are EAPCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top