Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Virginia by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Breast, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Virginia 6,10 124.6 (123.2, 126.1) 5,724 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 123.0 (122.8, 123.2) 220,205 § 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Bristol City 6,10 62.3 (44.0, 86.4) 8 2008-2012 * *
Tazewell County 6,10 67.3 (54.6, 82.5) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.3 (-31.3, 49.4)
Buchanan County 6,10 69.8 (53.0, 91.1) 12 2008-2012 * *
Buckingham County 6,10 74.1 (51.2, 104.3) 7 2008-2012 * *
Bland County 6,10 74.1 (42.1, 125.0) 3 2008-2012 * *
Manassas Park City 6,10 74.3 (42.1, 119.6) 3 2008-2012 * *
Dickenson County 6,10 75.6 (54.4, 103.3) 9 2008-2012 * *
Russell County 6,10 78.9 (62.2, 99.1) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.9 (-23.7, 8.7)
Emporia City 6,10 82.8 (46.8, 137.5) 3 2008-2012 * *
Fairfax City 6,10 83.6 (63.4, 108.5) 12 2008-2012 * *
Scott County 6,10 84.1 (63.8, 109.2) 13 2008-2012 * *
Grayson County 6,10 86.3 (63.9, 115.6) 11 2008-2012 * *
Bath County 6,10 87.0 (51.1, 146.7) 4 2008-2012 * *
Pulaski County 6,10 87.0 (71.0, 106.0) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.8 (-32.9, 54.6)
Carroll County 6,10 87.1 (69.6, 108.2) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -16.9 (-36.7, 9.3)
Giles County 6,10 87.9 (64.9, 117.0) 11 2008-2012 * *
Madison County 6,10 89.0 (63.1, 123.0) 8 2008-2012 * *
Smyth County 6,10 90.2 (73.1, 110.6) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-7.5, 7.7)
Dinwiddie County 6,10 90.4 (71.4, 113.3) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.8 (-24.4, 25.0)
Lee County 6,10 90.4 (70.8, 114.4) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend -25.5 (-47.4, 5.7)
Pittsylvania County 6,10 94.1 (81.6, 108.2) 43 2008-2012 stable stable trend -15.1 (-31.1, 4.5)
Rockbridge County 6,10 97.3 (76.1, 123.3) 16 2008-2012 falling falling trend -17.7 (-24.5, -10.3)
Campbell County 6,10 97.3 (83.2, 113.3) 36 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.2 (-28.4, 22.9)
King and Queen County 6,10 99.3 (64.1, 150.0) 5 2008-2012 * *
Floyd County 6,10 99.4 (74.1, 131.6) 11 2008-2012 * *
Richmond County 6,10 100.0 (65.3, 148.8) 6 2008-2012 * *
Patrick County 6,10 100.0 (76.6, 129.2) 14 2008-2012 * *
Wythe County 6,10 102.0 (83.6, 123.8) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (-22.9, 29.8)
Alleghany Cnty and Clifton Forge Cty 6,10 102.2 (77.7, 133.2) 13 2008-2012 * *
Lunenburg County 6,10 104.6 (72.9, 146.0) 8 2008-2012 * *
Fauquier County 6,10 104.9 (90.9, 120.5) 42 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.1 (-23.9, 11.1)
Wise County 6,10 106.3 (88.7, 126.7) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend -20.3 (-45.0, 15.7)
Westmoreland County 6,10 106.6 (82.7, 136.3) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.6 (-11.5, 21.3)
Culpeper County 6,10 106.7 (89.3, 126.6) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend -13.7 (-39.3, 22.7)
Prince George County 6,10 106.8 (85.8, 131.3) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -10.4 (-33.1, 20.1)
Caroline County 6,10 108.0 (86.9, 132.9) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.9 (-27.5, 24.8)
Page County 6,10 108.2 (86.6, 134.2) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.7 (-7.2, 15.9)
Accomack County 6,10 109.1 (90.2, 131.1) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.4 (-25.6, 20.2)
Amherst County 6,10 109.4 (90.7, 131.2) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.5 (-14.6, 20.6)
Rockingham County 6,10 111.0 (97.9, 125.4) 54 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.4 (-37.8, 37.8)
Alexandria City 6,10 111.3 (100.3, 123.3) 80 2008-2012 falling falling trend -14.1 (-26.1, -0.1)
Prince William County 6,10 111.4 (104.2, 119.0) 200 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.7, 2.3)
Charlotte County 6,10 111.6 (81.3, 150.5) 10 2008-2012 * *
Augusta County 6,10 111.7 (98.5, 126.3) 55 2008-2012 falling falling trend -8.7 (-16.6, -0.1)
Radford City 6,10 112.0 (77.0, 157.9) 7 2008-2012 * *
Spotsylvania County 6,10 112.1 (100.6, 124.6) 72 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.9 (-9.7, 15.0)
Powhatan County 6,10 112.2 (89.2, 139.6) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend 12.6 (-1.0, 28.0)
York County 6,10 112.3 (97.6, 128.6) 44 2008-2012 falling falling trend -10.0 (-14.9, -4.9)
Albemarle County 6,10 112.4 (100.4, 125.4) 68 2008-2012 stable stable trend -16.3 (-31.6, 2.3)
Manassas City 6,10 113.4 (91.1, 139.5) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.9 (-10.6, 3.3)
Southampton County 6,10 114.9 (87.9, 148.2) 13 2008-2012 * *
Prince Edward County 6,10 115.1 (88.7, 147.0) 14 2008-2012 * *
Warren County 6,10 115.4 (95.7, 138.0) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.9 (-18.3, 8.3)
Gloucester County 6,10 115.9 (97.2, 137.4) 28 2008-2012 stable stable trend -13.2 (-39.4, 24.2)
Botetourt County 6,10 117.4 (98.0, 140.1) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.3 (-24.2, 18.4)
Northampton County 6,10 117.5 (88.7, 154.4) 13 2008-2012 * *
Bedford County 6,10 117.6 (103.9, 132.9) 56 2008-2012 falling falling trend -9.4 (-15.4, -2.9)
Appomattox County 6,10 118.4 (89.9, 153.8) 12 2008-2012 * *
Washington County 6,10 118.9 (103.6, 136.0) 46 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.0 (-41.3, 57.1)
Mathews County 6,10 119.3 (86.7, 163.7) 10 2008-2012 * *
Halifax County with South Boston City 6,10 119.3 (100.1, 141.4) 31 2008-2012 stable stable trend -11.0 (-33.0, 18.1)
Fluvanna County 6,10 119.5 (97.2, 145.7) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.3 (-6.6, 18.8)
Roanoke County 6,10 119.7 (107.9, 132.6) 80 2008-2012 falling falling trend -8.9 (-12.3, -5.4)
Goochland County 6,10 120.2 (95.8, 149.7) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -10.2 (-30.7, 16.5)
Stafford County 6,10 120.3 (107.6, 134.0) 72 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.8 (-0.2, 14.4)
Louisa County 6,10 120.7 (100.1, 144.7) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.1 (-23.1, 12.1)
Essex County 6,10 122.1 (89.8, 163.6) 10 2008-2012 * *
Hopewell City 6,10 122.6 (96.9, 153.1) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.5 (-28.9, 56.5)
Mecklenburg County 6,10 123.2 (103.0, 146.8) 30 2008-2012 stable stable trend -10.2 (-24.4, 6.6)
Loudoun County 6,10 123.4 (114.8, 132.5) 171 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.4, 6.3)
Franklin County 6,10 123.6 (107.7, 141.4) 48 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.3 (-30.8, 29.7)
Greene County 6,10 123.7 (95.5, 158.0) 14 2008-2012 * *
Cumberland County 6,10 124.7 (88.3, 171.9) 8 2008-2012 * *
Hampton City 6,10 125.4 (114.5, 137.1) 100 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.7 (-6.0, 10.2)
Richmond City 6,10 125.8 (116.2, 135.9) 136 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.2 (-7.2, 3.0)
Fairfax County 6,10 125.9 (121.8, 130.2) 736 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.8, 6.2)
Greensville County 6,10 126.2 (87.9, 176.7) 8 2008-2012 * *
Shenandoah County 6,10 126.4 (108.1, 147.2) 37 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.9 (-20.4, 18.4)
Sussex County 6,10 127.4 (89.4, 177.0) 8 2008-2012 * *
King George County 6,10 127.6 (99.7, 160.9) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.8 (-8.2, 2.9)
Nelson County 6,10 127.9 (99.2, 163.5) 15 2008-2012 rising rising trend 10.0 (3.5, 16.9)
Suffolk City 6,10 127.9 (113.8, 143.3) 61 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.6 (-15.3, 26.6)
Virginia Beach City 6,10 128.1 (121.7, 134.9) 302 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.0, 7.4)
James City County 6,10 128.5 (114.0, 144.5) 64 2008-2012 stable stable trend -15.2 (-42.9, 25.8)
Surry County 6,10 129.3 (87.7, 186.5) 6 2008-2012 * *
Brunswick County 6,10 130.2 (101.2, 165.7) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.3 (-18.0, 22.6)
Orange County 6,10 130.8 (110.0, 154.6) 30 2008-2012 stable stable trend 9.0 (-6.3, 26.7)
Winchester City 6,10 130.8 (105.6, 160.2) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.9 (-12.0, 20.4)
Nottoway County 6,10 130.8 (100.7, 167.9) 14 2008-2012 * *
Montgomery County 6,10 132.1 (116.6, 149.1) 54 2008-2012 stable stable trend -11.0 (-33.2, 18.5)
Lancaster County 6,10 135.1 (101.0, 179.5) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend 9.7 (-15.1, 41.9)
Chesapeake City 6,10 135.5 (126.3, 145.2) 167 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.9, 7.1)
Charles City County 6,10 135.7 (92.7, 194.7) 7 2008-2012 * *
Henrico County 6,10 135.9 (128.4, 143.8) 253 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.0 (-12.3, 9.5)
Norton City 6,10 136.0 (78.5, 221.1) 4 2008-2012 * *
Norfolk City 6,10 136.2 (126.6, 146.4) 154 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.2 (-5.7, 12.9)
Staunton City 6,10 137.4 (111.9, 167.3) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend 17.1 (-6.7, 47.1)
Portsmouth City 6,10 137.7 (124.2, 152.4) 79 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.3 (-16.0, 11.2)
Rappahannock County 6,10 137.8 (94.0, 197.4) 7 2008-2012 * *
Newport News City 6,10 137.9 (127.4, 149.1) 130 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.5 (-6.2, 14.2)
Chesterfield County 6,10 138.2 (130.4, 146.4) 248 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.2, 4.4)
Henry County 6,10 139.2 (122.5, 157.7) 55 2008-2012 stable stable trend -9.4 (-20.7, 3.4)
Hanover County 6,10 140.1 (127.0, 154.3) 88 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.9 (-6.8, 11.3)
Falls Church City 6,10 140.3 (101.1, 189.7) 9 2008-2012 * *
Roanoke City 6,10 140.6 (127.3, 155.0) 87 2008-2012 stable stable trend 13.4 (-8.4, 40.5)
Amelia County 6,10 141.6 (107.1, 184.4) 12 2008-2012 * *
Isle of Wight County 6,10 142.0 (120.9, 166.0) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.7 (-9.1, 8.6)
Northumberland County 6,10 142.2 (105.6, 189.0) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.6 (-43.8, 62.1)
Arlington County 6,10 143.7 (132.8, 155.2) 137 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.9 (-8.0, 10.8)
New Kent County 6,10 145.5 (113.8, 183.8) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.7 (-23.6, 24.0)
Frederick County 6,10 145.7 (130.0, 162.8) 65 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.6 (-9.4, 16.3)
Middlesex County 6,10 146.7 (111.1, 192.8) 13 2008-2012 * *
Poquoson City 6,10 147.3 (111.7, 192.0) 12 2008-2012 * *
Lynchburg City 6,10 147.8 (130.9, 166.3) 61 2008-2012 stable stable trend 15.3 (-9.2, 46.6)
Galax City 6,10 147.9 (102.9, 207.7) 8 2008-2012 * *
King William County 6,10 148.3 (115.2, 188.3) 14 2008-2012 * *
Clarke County 6,10 148.6 (114.8, 190.3) 14 2008-2012 * *
Danville City 6,10 148.8 (129.7, 170.2) 48 2008-2012 stable stable trend 11.6 (-18.2, 52.3)
Bedford City 6,10 153.5 (103.1, 221.3) 7 2008-2012 * *
Colonial Heights City 6,10 154.1 (122.7, 191.4) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend 9.5 (-8.5, 31.0)
Fredericksburg City 6,10 154.9 (124.3, 190.7) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -9.8 (-23.9, 6.8)
Franklin City 6,10 156.2 (112.6, 211.9) 9 2008-2012 * *
Waynesboro City 6,10 157.5 (128.5, 191.3) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.5 (-12.0, 29.1)
Buena Vista City 6,10 158.4 (109.2, 223.4) 7 2008-2012 * *
Martinsville City 6,10 160.4 (125.3, 202.7) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 8.2 (-23.7, 53.4)
Covington City 6,10 165.5 (113.4, 235.5) 7 2008-2012 * *
Harrisonburg City 6,10 167.6 (140.7, 198.1) 29 2008-2012 stable stable trend 7.8 (-26.2, 57.6)
Petersburg City 6,10 167.8 (142.7, 196.2) 35 2008-2012 stable stable trend 21.3 (-18.3, 80.1)
Lexington City 6,10 168.8 (109.0, 253.5) 6 2008-2012 * *
Salem City 6,10 172.0 (144.0, 204.3) 29 2008-2012 stable stable trend 12.3 (-12.7, 44.6)
Charlottesville City 6,10 233.6 (203.3, 267.2) 44 2008-2012 stable stable trend 24.0 (-13.0, 76.7)
Williamsburg City 6,10 364.1 (295.6, 444.2) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend 55.0 (-37.5, 284.7)
Craig County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Highland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/02/2015 2:23 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top