Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Cancer Sites, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countascending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Wisconsin 6,10 459.5 (457.1, 461.9) 29,577 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 453.8 (453.5, 454.1) 1,526,274 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Milwaukee County 6,10 494.3 (487.8, 500.8) 4,630 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Waukesha County 6,10 474.7 (465.7, 483.8) 2,221 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.9, 2.8)
Dane County 6,10 430.7 (422.0, 439.4) 2,015 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.0, 1.1)
Brown County 6,10 479.1 (466.9, 491.5) 1,214 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.9)
Racine County 6,10 491.6 (478.3, 505.2) 1,069 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.7)
Winnebago County 6,10 483.9 (469.5, 498.5) 891 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.8, 3.8)
Outagamie County 6,10 464.9 (450.8, 479.4) 845 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.9, 4.1)
Rock County 6,10 455.0 (441.0, 469.3) 819 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.8, 5.5)
Kenosha County 6,10 470.4 (455.5, 485.7) 781 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.5)
Marathon County 6,10 478.1 (462.6, 494.1) 743 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.6, 2.3)
Washington County 6,10 467.5 (451.9, 483.5) 707 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.2, 2.6)
Sheboygan County 6,10 481.7 (465.1, 498.7) 659 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.5 (-8.1, 3.4)
Fond du Lac County 6,10 477.0 (459.5, 495.1) 579 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.3, -0.6)
La Crosse County 6,10 457.2 (440.3, 474.6) 571 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.6 (-12.0, 5.5)
Walworth County 6,10 492.4 (474.0, 511.4) 560 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.9, 3.5)
Ozaukee County 6,10 484.1 (465.2, 503.6) 522 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.2, -0.5)
Manitowoc County 6,10 440.1 (422.1, 458.8) 471 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.1 (-9.1, 3.3)
Dodge County 6,10 437.3 (419.5, 455.8) 463 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.4)
Eau Claire County 6,10 440.9 (422.6, 459.9) 454 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.2, 2.2)
Wood County 6,10 452.9 (433.7, 472.7) 442 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 2.4)
Jefferson County 6,10 446.1 (426.8, 466.0) 416 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.4 (-9.1, 4.8)
Chippewa County 6,10 482.4 (459.9, 505.7) 356 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.9, 1.7)
Waupaca County 6,10 472.2 (449.1, 496.2) 333 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.2, 4.8)
Columbia County 6,10 476.1 (452.8, 500.4) 323 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.0 (-12.7, 7.8)
Sauk County 6,10 420.9 (400.0, 442.7) 316 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.6 (-12.8, 6.5)
Portage County 6,10 414.5 (393.6, 436.2) 308 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.6 (-8.0, 1.0)
Oneida County 6,10 514.4 (487.5, 542.7) 297 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-7.6, 5.5)
Marinette County 6,10 466.3 (441.2, 492.6) 280 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.4, 5.4)
Grant County 6,10 428.2 (404.6, 453.0) 257 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.4, 1.5)
Shawano County 6,10 457.1 (431.8, 483.6) 257 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.4, 5.7)
Barron County 6,10 412.1 (389.1, 436.2) 254 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.5, 6.6)
St. Croix County 6,10 315.2 (297.5, 333.8) 249 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-10.7, 9.4)
Calumet County 6,10 474.1 (447.1, 502.3) 238 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.5 (-14.3, 6.3)
Monroe County 6,10 459.2 (433.0, 486.6) 238 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.9 (-5.1, 7.3)
Oconto County 6,10 483.9 (455.8, 513.3) 233 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.6, 3.4)
Vilas County 6,10 572.8 (536.5, 611.3) 218 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.0 (-14.1, 9.7)
Door County 6,10 449.3 (420.7, 479.6) 208 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.7, 2.0)
Lincoln County 6,10 498.7 (466.9, 532.2) 196 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-12.0, 13.2)
Green County 6,10 420.0 (393.0, 448.5) 187 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.7 (-9.5, 0.5)
Douglas County 6,10 354.7 (331.8, 378.7) 187 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.8, 2.4)
Clark County 6,10 455.2 (425.6, 486.4) 184 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.8 (-11.3, 10.9)
Polk County 6,10 321.4 (300.5, 343.5) 182 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.8 (-14.1, 3.3)
Dunn County 6,10 396.1 (369.8, 423.7) 177 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.8 (-8.7, 5.7)
Adams County 6,10 467.9 (434.6, 503.5) 164 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.9 (-9.2, 1.8)
Trempealeau County 6,10 452.0 (420.8, 485.1) 162 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.3 (-12.2, 10.9)
Vernon County 6,10 415.9 (386.8, 446.7) 160 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.8 (-7.0, 9.3)
Waushara County 6,10 432.3 (401.7, 464.8) 158 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.5, -0.9)
Juneau County 6,10 434.3 (403.5, 466.9) 155 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.5 (-11.7, 1.2)
Langlade County 6,10 448.8 (414.0, 486.1) 132 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.2, 3.8)
Sawyer County 6,10 483.8 (444.2, 526.4) 123 2008-2012 falling falling trend -7.5 (-13.0, -1.7)
Green Lake County 6,10 441.8 (405.9, 480.4) 120 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.6 (-8.0, 7.4)
Iowa County 6,10 424.1 (390.1, 460.4) 120 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.3 (-16.2, 7.2)
Washburn County 6,10 472.2 (432.6, 514.9) 116 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.6 (-13.7, 24.3)
Jackson County 6,10 441.2 (405.1, 479.8) 114 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.7 (-15.4, 16.6)
Kewaunee County 6,10 422.0 (386.9, 459.5) 112 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.1 (-6.1, 8.9)
Marquette County 6,10 471.9 (431.5, 515.6) 110 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.4 (-15.7, 6.2)
Crawford County 6,10 466.4 (426.9, 509.0) 109 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.3 (-12.9, 0.8)
Pierce County 6,10 278.5 (254.9, 303.6) 108 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.8 (-2.6, 17.0)
Taylor County 6,10 412.7 (377.7, 450.2) 107 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.5 (-12.7, 6.7)
Richland County 6,10 420.9 (384.3, 460.3) 105 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.8 (-8.1, 10.5)
Burnett County 6,10 399.2 (363.4, 438.1) 103 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.7 (-25.1, 18.6)
Rusk County 6,10 484.9 (441.6, 531.6) 102 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.5 (-16.4, 23.4)
Price County 6,10 451.2 (410.6, 495.4) 100 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.3 (-3.9, 17.6)
Ashland County 6,10 451.5 (409.7, 496.6) 90 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.5 (-12.1, 17.1)
Bayfield County 6,10 369.9 (333.9, 409.4) 88 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.9 (-19.7, 3.2)
Lafayette County 6,10 423.2 (383.4, 466.2) 86 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.5 (-19.6, 4.2)
Buffalo County 6,10 385.7 (345.5, 429.8) 71 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.4, 6.5)
Forest County 6,10 490.6 (438.8, 547.7) 68 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.3 (-14.5, 29.7)
Iron County 6,10 451.5 (392.2, 519.4) 49 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.6 (-28.4, 41.4)
Pepin County 6,10 387.6 (333.7, 448.4) 39 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.6 (-14.0, 32.2)
Florence County 6,10 308.2 (252.1, 375.9) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.2 (-28.0, 17.2)
Menominee County 6,10 478.4 (382.4, 590.7) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.1 (-34.1, 45.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/03/2015 11:11 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top