Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Wisconsin 6,10 54.3 (53.2, 55.5) 1,891 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 54.1 (53.9, 54.2) 99,801 § falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Milwaukee County 6,10 61.7 (58.6, 64.9) 319 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.2, 5.4)
Waukesha County 6,10 47.8 (44.0, 51.8) 123 stable stable trend 1.1 (-12.1, 16.2)
Dane County 6,10 47.1 (43.2, 51.3) 112 stable stable trend 3.0 (-7.7, 15.0)
Racine County 6,10 65.4 (58.9, 72.5) 76 stable stable trend -5.3 (-15.1, 5.5)
Brown County 6,10 51.1 (45.8, 56.8) 71 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.9, 5.5)
Rock County 6,10 70.1 (62.8, 78.0) 69 stable stable trend 2.5 (-10.5, 17.3)
Winnebago County 6,10 62.0 (55.2, 69.4) 63 falling falling trend -9.2 (-13.0, -5.1)
Kenosha County 6,10 68.7 (61.0, 77.0) 60 stable stable trend 6.4 (-8.3, 23.4)
Outagamie County 6,10 51.1 (44.8, 58.0) 49 stable stable trend -5.3 (-23.4, 17.0)
Fond du Lac County 6,10 62.4 (54.1, 71.7) 42 stable stable trend 1.4 (-4.9, 8.2)
Washington County 6,10 50.1 (43.4, 57.7) 41 stable stable trend -4.4 (-14.5, 6.8)
Marathon County 6,10 43.6 (37.4, 50.5) 37 stable stable trend -5.2 (-21.7, 14.9)
Sheboygan County 6,10 49.3 (42.3, 57.2) 37 stable stable trend 4.7 (-9.8, 21.5)
Walworth County 6,10 57.0 (48.7, 66.4) 35 stable stable trend -2.2 (-15.0, 12.6)
La Crosse County 6,10 49.1 (41.7, 57.3) 33 stable stable trend 11.2 (-7.2, 33.3)
Eau Claire County 6,10 48.7 (40.6, 57.9) 27 stable stable trend 2.7 (-5.2, 11.4)
Wood County 6,10 50.5 (42.2, 60.1) 27 stable stable trend -5.2 (-15.6, 6.5)
Dodge County 6,10 47.0 (39.3, 55.9) 27 stable stable trend 3.9 (-10.2, 20.3)
Ozaukee County 6,10 44.7 (37.3, 53.2) 27 stable stable trend 0.8 (-14.4, 18.6)
Manitowoc County 6,10 43.2 (36.0, 51.6) 26 stable stable trend 6.8 (-15.5, 34.9)
Chippewa County 6,10 63.9 (52.9, 76.7) 24 stable stable trend 4.6 (-5.9, 16.2)
Oneida County 6,10 75.8 (62.5, 91.7) 24 stable stable trend -2.1 (-18.0, 16.8)
Columbia County 6,10 61.4 (50.3, 74.5) 22 stable stable trend 0.7 (-16.6, 21.5)
Jefferson County 6,10 43.8 (35.8, 53.0) 22 stable stable trend 3.7 (-23.4, 40.4)
Barron County 6,10 62.7 (51.3, 76.3) 22 stable stable trend -5.8 (-21.7, 13.3)
Waupaca County 6,10 54.8 (44.6, 66.9) 21 stable stable trend 2.2 (-20.1, 30.8)
Marinette County 6,10 59.7 (48.2, 73.5) 20 stable stable trend 11.2 (-12.7, 41.7)
Sauk County 6,10 46.6 (37.6, 57.4) 19 stable stable trend 5.4 (-12.7, 27.3)
Portage County 6,10 45.3 (36.3, 56.0) 18 stable stable trend 0.5 (-23.3, 31.6)
Grant County 6,10 50.7 (40.1, 63.4) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-19.4, 21.0)
Douglas County 6,10 58.2 (46.0, 72.8) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-23.6, 32.4)
Oconto County 6,10 62.7 (49.5, 78.7) 16 stable stable trend -4.3 (-28.6, 28.4)
Monroe County 6,10 58.5 (46.1, 73.3) 16 stable stable trend 19.7 (-3.1, 47.9)
Shawano County 6,10 49.4 (38.9, 62.3) 15 stable stable trend 1.4 (-17.2, 24.1)
Lincoln County 6,10 67.1 (52.6, 85.1) 15 stable stable trend 11.2 (-5.9, 31.4)
Vilas County 6,10 65.9 (51.4, 85.0) 14
*
*
St. Croix County 6,10 35.9 (27.8, 45.5) 14
*
*
Adams County 6,10 75.9 (58.4, 98.8) 14
*
*
Door County 6,10 55.0 (42.4, 71.2) 14
*
*
Polk County 6,10 45.9 (35.6, 58.6) 14
*
*
Waushara County 6,10 69.6 (53.8, 89.7) 13
*
*
Green County 6,10 51.4 (39.2, 66.5) 12
*
*
Calumet County 6,10 46.4 (35.1, 60.2) 12
*
*
Juneau County 6,10 59.2 (44.7, 77.7) 11
*
*
Burnett County 6,10 86.2 (64.0, 115.3) 11
*
*
Clark County 6,10 51.0 (38.2, 67.0) 11
*
*
Langlade County 6,10 65.1 (48.4, 86.9) 10
*
*
Dunn County 6,10 39.3 (28.8, 52.5) 10
*
*
Trempealeau County 6,10 49.4 (36.0, 66.5) 9
*
*
Rusk County 6,10 64.4 (45.7, 89.9) 8
*
*
Vernon County 6,10 39.5 (28.1, 54.3) 8
*
*
Sawyer County 6,10 62.3 (43.1, 88.3) 8
*
*
Marquette County 6,10 59.0 (41.1, 83.9) 7
*
*
Washburn County 6,10 55.3 (38.0, 79.3) 7
*
*
Ashland County 6,10 61.6 (42.3, 87.5) 7
*
*
Crawford County 6,10 56.5 (38.8, 80.7) 7
*
*
Jackson County 6,10 52.2 (36.2, 73.6) 7
*
*
Kewaunee County 6,10 47.1 (32.4, 67.0) 7
*
*
Price County 6,10 56.7 (39.1, 81.9) 7
*
*
Iowa County 6,10 43.6 (29.8, 61.9) 7
*
*
Green Lake County 6,10 42.3 (28.5, 61.6) 6
*
*
Taylor County 6,10 46.3 (31.2, 66.9) 6
*
*
Richland County 6,10 44.1 (29.2, 64.9) 6
*
*
Buffalo County 6,10 56.5 (37.7, 83.0) 6
*
*
Pierce County 6,10 27.7 (18.1, 40.5) 5
*
*
Forest County 6,10 70.8 (46.1, 106.7) 5
*
*
Bayfield County 6,10 40.9 (26.1, 63.6) 5
*
*
Iron County 6,10 78.0 (49.5, 125.9) 5
*
*
Lafayette County 6,10 39.0 (23.9, 60.7) 4
*
*
Florence County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/02/2016 8:36 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top