Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Melanoma of the Skin, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Wisconsin 6,10 17.0 (16.4, 17.7) 530 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.9 (-2.7, 10.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 15.8 (15.7, 15.9) 26,903 § 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Adams County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Ashland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Barron County 6,10 19.3 (11.8, 29.6) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.5 (-43.2, 74.3)
Bayfield County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Brown County 6,10 28.3 (24.2, 32.8) 36 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.7 (-12.5, 40.1)
Buffalo County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Burnett County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Calumet County 6,10 33.1 (23.7, 45.0) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.6 (-28.4, 14.1)
Chippewa County 6,10 19.1 (12.8, 27.4) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 9 (-6.8, 27.3)
Clark County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.7 (-36.6, 76.3)
Columbia County 6,10 14.1 (8.8, 21.4) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 41.7 (-9.7, 122.4)
Crawford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Dane County 6,10 18.7 (16.3, 21.3) 46 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.8, 3.3)
Dodge County 6,10 18.3 (13.0, 24.9) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 27.4 (-10.0, 80.3)
Door County 6,10 31.4 (20.2, 47.1) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -17.9 (-51.8, 39.9)
Douglas County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Dunn County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Eau Claire County 6,10 18.8 (13.6, 25.3) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.2 (-29.6, 66.2)
Florence County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Fond du Lac County 6,10 29.8 (23.5, 37.2) 16 2007-2011 rising rising trend 10.8 (0.2, 22.6)
Forest County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Grant County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Green County 6,10 21.5 (13.0, 33.5) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -15.8 (-46.4, 32.1)
Green Lake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Iowa County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Iron County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jackson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jefferson County 6,10 12.4 (8.2, 17.9) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 27.7 (-12.6, 86.7)
Juneau County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Kenosha County 6,10 9.0 (6.4, 12.3) 8 2007-2011 rising rising trend 19.2 (3.5, 37.2)
Kewaunee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
La Crosse County 6,10 18.0 (13.4, 23.6) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend 22.6 (-27.6, 107.4)
Lafayette County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Langlade County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lincoln County 6,10 19.7 (10.9, 32.8) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (0.0, 0.0)
Manitowoc County 6,10 31.7 (24.6, 40.1) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.9 (-38.0, 42.9)
Marathon County 6,10 15.7 (11.8, 20.5) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.6 (-20.5, 43.0)
Marinette County 6,10 14.6 (8.2, 24.1) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.3 (-61.2, 102.9)
Marquette County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Menominee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Milwaukee County 6,10 10.4 (9.2, 11.7) 54 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.7 (-19.2, 19.6)
Monroe County 6,10 23.6 (15.4, 34.5) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 9.5 (-43.2, 111.1)
Oconto County 6,10 22.4 (13.9, 34.2) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -16.1 (-41.3, 19.8)
Oneida County 6,10 15.3 (9.0, 24.9) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.5 (-30.2, 30.9)
Outagamie County 6,10 26.7 (22.1, 31.9) 25 2007-2011 rising rising trend 23.8 (6.3, 44.3)
Ozaukee County 6,10 21.8 (16.2, 28.7) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.9 (-32.6, 12.7)
Pepin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Pierce County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Polk County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Portage County 6,10 17.7 (11.7, 25.5) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -21.4 (-54.2, 34.6)
Price County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Racine County 6,10 8.9 (6.5, 11.9) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -13 (-42.5, 31.6)
Richland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Rock County 6,10 16.4 (12.7, 20.8) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.5 (-24.4, 10.8)
Rusk County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Sauk County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Sawyer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Shawano County 6,10 19.2 (11.8, 29.5) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 17 (-37.0, 117.0)
Sheboygan County 6,10 21.1 (16.2, 27.0) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend 9.9 (-21.0, 53.0)
St. Croix County 6,10 10.2 (6.3, 15.6) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.7 (-13.6, 29.2)
Taylor County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Trempealeau County 6,10 25.7 (14.8, 41.4) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -30.2 (-74.9, 93.6)
Vernon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Vilas County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Walworth County 6,10 23.8 (18.4, 30.3) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.8 (-4.7, 28.9)
Washburn County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Washington County 6,10 18.6 (14.3, 23.9) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.8 (-38.3, 53.2)
Waukesha County 6,10 22.1 (19.3, 25.1) 49 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.2 (-15.4, 6.2)
Waupaca County 6,10 22.0 (15.0, 31.4) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.2 (-46.0, 100.8)
Waushara County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Winnebago County 6,10 23.9 (19.5, 28.9) 22 2007-2011 stable stable trend 28.2 (-8.2, 79.1)
Wood County 6,10 11.3 (7.2, 16.9) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.3 (-15.3, 10.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/22/2014 2:52 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top