Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Ovary, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent AAPC
sort sort by trenddescending
Wisconsin 6,10 12.9 (12.4, 13.5) 431 2007-2011 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.9, -1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 12.0 (12.0, 12.1) 21,341 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.7)
Marinette County 6,10 18.3 (11.0, 28.7) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10 (-49.6, 60.5)
Vilas County 6,10 17.5 (9.6, 31.2) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 13.2 (-35.2, 97.9)
Clark County 6,10 16.9 (9.5, 27.8) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (0.0, 0.0)
Waupaca County 6,10 16.7 (11.1, 24.5) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.3 (-32.2, 18.7)
Jefferson County 6,10 15.6 (10.9, 21.5) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -22.5 (-54.4, 31.7)
Sheboygan County 6,10 15.5 (11.7, 20.2) 11 2007-2011 falling falling trend -22.6 (-38.0, -3.4)
Manitowoc County 6,10 15.4 (10.9, 21.2) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.6 (-25.1, 6.7)
Columbia County 6,10 15.1 (9.9, 22.3) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.4 (-41.0, 36.3)
Ozaukee County 6,10 14.9 (10.6, 20.4) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.4 (-20.5, 22.4)
Eau Claire County 6,10 14.9 (10.4, 20.6) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 18.9 (-15.9, 68.1)
Marathon County 6,10 14.7 (11.1, 19.2) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.4 (-30.9, 40.8)
Oneida County 6,10 14.5 (9.1, 23.0) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.4 (-43.1, 38.2)
Rock County 6,10 14.5 (11.2, 18.4) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.4 (-30.7, 29.1)
Dane County 6,10 14.5 (12.4, 16.8) 36 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11 (-23.0, 2.8)
Winnebago County 6,10 13.8 (10.6, 17.7) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.5 (-11.1, 27.4)
Walworth County 6,10 13.7 (9.6, 18.9) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.6 (-17.9, 48.9)
Door County 6,10 13.6 (7.4, 24.1) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.3 (-59.6, 122.1)
Waukesha County 6,10 13.5 (11.5, 15.8) 33 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2 (-4.6, 9.1)
Barron County 6,10 13.4 (7.9, 21.5) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.1 (-57.0, 109.5)
Chippewa County 6,10 12.8 (8.1, 19.4) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.5 (-47.1, 83.1)
Milwaukee County 6,10 12.7 (11.3, 14.2) 66 2007-2011 falling falling trend -7.5 (-11.0, -3.8)
Racine County 6,10 12.7 (9.9, 16.1) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.8 (-43.9, 35.6)
Douglas County 6,10 12.7 (7.2, 20.7) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -13.3 (-58.7, 82.1)
Wood County 6,10 12.6 (8.4, 18.3) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 12 (-7.4, 35.3)
Washington County 6,10 12.4 (9.1, 16.7) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.9 (-12.3, 23.1)
Grant County 6,10 12.2 (6.8, 20.2) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.7 (-53.8, 80.4)
Fond du Lac County 6,10 12.1 (8.5, 16.8) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.7 (-24.0, 55.4)
Sauk County 6,10 12.0 (7.5, 18.4) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -13.5 (-39.3, 23.3)
Dodge County 6,10 11.7 (7.9, 16.9) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.9 (-40.9, 40.5)
Outagamie County 6,10 11.7 (8.8, 15.3) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.9 (-19.7, 17.5)
Brown County 6,10 11.6 (9.1, 14.5) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8 (-34.6, 29.3)
Kenosha County 6,10 10.9 (8.0, 14.5) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.4 (-20.5, 39.9)
La Crosse County 6,10 10.1 (6.8, 14.4) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.3 (-23.7, 53.6)
Polk County 6,10 10.0 (5.6, 16.8) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -26.7 (-63.9, 49.2)
St. Croix County 6,10 7.6 (4.3, 12.4) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.5 (-47.2, 99.1)
Adams County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Ashland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Bayfield County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Buffalo County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Burnett County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Calumet County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Crawford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Dunn County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Florence County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Forest County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Green County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Green Lake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Iowa County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Iron County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jackson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Juneau County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Kewaunee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lafayette County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Langlade County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lincoln County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Marquette County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Menominee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Monroe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Oconto County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Pepin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Pierce County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Portage County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend -14.8 (-49.1, 42.7)
Price County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Richland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Rusk County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Sawyer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Shawano County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Taylor County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Trempealeau County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Vernon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Washburn County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Waushara County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 falling falling trend -26 (-42.1, -5.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/24/2014 12:09 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are EAPCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top