Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2019-2023

Tennessee Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by name

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling - 318,737 171.5 (171.3, 171.8) - -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Tennessee - falling - 7,843 202.5 (200.5, 204.6) - -1.7 (-1.8, -1.6)
Anderson County 5 falling higher 104 199.9 (182.6, 218.4) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Bedford County 5 falling higher 59 230.0 (203.1, 259.5) 1.3 -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Benton County 5 falling higher 28 224.2 (186.8, 268.0) 1.3 -6.4 (-17.9, -1.4)
Bledsoe County 7 stable lower 16 138.9 (108.6, 176.0) 0.8 -2.0 (-3.8, 0.1)
Blount County 8 falling similar 162 172.1 (160.0, 184.9) 1.0 -2.3 (-2.8, -1.9)
Bradley County 5 falling higher 124 203.4 (186.9, 220.9) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Campbell County 5 falling higher 64 233.5 (207.8, 261.7) 1.4 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Cannon County 5 falling higher 20 222.1 (178.8, 273.1) 1.3 -14.5 (-26.0, -1.1)
Carroll County 5 falling higher 47 257.3 (224.4, 293.9) 1.5 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Carter County 4 stable higher 85 202.4 (183.0, 223.6) 1.2 0.9 (-2.0, 7.4)
Cheatham County 4 stable higher 57 246.2 (216.0, 279.6) 1.4 -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Chester County 4 stable higher 25 271.8 (224.6, 326.2) 1.6 1.2 (-2.7, 9.8)
Claiborne County 5 falling higher 47 222.8 (193.8, 255.2) 1.3 -2.2 (-3.4, -0.9)
Clay County 4 stable higher 17 272.5 (214.8, 343.6) 1.6 -0.2 (-2.2, 2.0)
Cocke County 5 falling higher 62 239.8 (212.0, 270.5) 1.4 -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Coffee County 5 falling higher 76 223.4 (200.9, 247.9) 1.3 -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Crockett County 4 stable higher 22 254.7 (207.9, 309.5) 1.5 -0.5 (-2.3, 1.4)
Cumberland County 8 falling similar 112 181.8 (165.8, 199.3) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Davidson County 8 falling similar 552 187.5 (180.2, 195.1) 1.1 -2.7 (-4.0, -2.2)
DeKalb County 4 stable higher 34 253.9 (215.7, 297.4) 1.5 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Decatur County 4 stable higher 20 239.4 (193.2, 294.7) 1.4 -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Dickson County 4 stable higher 75 242.2 (217.1, 269.5) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Dyer County 4 stable higher 56 259.6 (229.1, 293.2) 1.5 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Fayette County 8 falling similar 58 189.3 (166.7, 214.4) 1.1 -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Fentress County 4 stable higher 34 254.0 (214.0, 299.9) 1.5 -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Franklin County 8 falling similar 56 194.5 (171.4, 220.0) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Gibson County 5 falling higher 81 270.1 (243.6, 298.8) 1.6 -1.2 (-2.4, -0.2)
Giles County 5 falling higher 44 216.6 (187.8, 249.1) 1.3 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Grainger County 5 falling higher 35 212.1 (179.2, 249.9) 1.2 -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Greene County 5 falling higher 114 227.2 (208.1, 247.8) 1.3 -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Grundy County 4 stable higher 23 238.3 (195.4, 288.8) 1.4 -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Hamblen County 5 falling higher 88 234.0 (211.9, 257.9) 1.4 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Hamilton County 8 falling similar 389 180.9 (172.8, 189.4) 1.1 -2.3 (-2.7, -2.0)
Hancock County 6 stable similar 12 217.0 (161.9, 287.8) 1.3 -0.6 (-2.5, 1.5)
Hardeman County 6 stable similar 33 199.1 (169.1, 233.3) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Hardin County 8 falling similar 41 198.9 (171.1, 230.6) 1.2 -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Hawkins County 4 stable higher 98 238.6 (217.1, 261.9) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Haywood County 4 stable higher 24 221.5 (182.0, 267.6) 1.3 -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Henderson County 5 falling higher 45 256.5 (223.1, 293.8) 1.5 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.2)
Henry County 5 falling higher 56 226.1 (199.2, 256.1) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Hickman County 4 stable higher 43 254.9 (220.3, 293.7) 1.5 -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Houston County 4 stable higher 15 264.4 (205.4, 336.8) 1.5 -0.3 (-1.9, 1.5)
Humphreys County 5 falling higher 29 213.0 (178.7, 252.6) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Jackson County 5 falling higher 22 218.6 (177.1, 268.8) 1.3 -1.8 (-3.3, -0.1)
Jefferson County 4 stable higher 82 219.1 (197.2, 243.0) 1.3 -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Johnson County 4 stable higher 32 234.6 (197.6, 277.2) 1.4 -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Knox County 8 falling similar 463 182.6 (175.0, 190.5) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Lake County 4 stable higher 10 272.6 (200.2, 363.5) 1.6 -1.0 (-3.7, 1.4)
Lauderdale County 4 stable higher 36 260.9 (221.9, 304.8) 1.5 -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Lawrence County 5 falling higher 59 230.2 (203.5, 259.6) 1.3 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Lewis County 4 stable higher 25 276.1 (227.7, 332.8) 1.6 -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Lincoln County 5 falling higher 51 223.8 (196.3, 254.4) 1.3 -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Loudon County 8 falling similar 83 171.4 (154.1, 190.3) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.8, -0.8)
Macon County 5 falling higher 33 235.8 (199.4, 277.1) 1.4 -2.3 (-12.5, -0.4)
Madison County 5 falling higher 110 196.1 (179.4, 214.1) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Marion County 5 falling higher 44 231.3 (200.2, 266.2) 1.3 -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Marshall County 5 falling higher 43 212.6 (183.4, 245.2) 1.2 -2.1 (-3.2, -0.9)
Maury County 8 falling similar 108 186.3 (170.0, 203.8) 1.1 -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
McMinn County 5 falling higher 78 214.7 (193.2, 238.1) 1.3 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
McNairy County 5 falling higher 40 226.3 (194.6, 262.2) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Meigs County 6 stable similar 20 213.1 (170.4, 264.2) 1.2 -0.8 (-3.0, 1.7)
Monroe County 5 falling higher 71 212.3 (189.4, 237.4) 1.2 -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Montgomery County 5 falling higher 160 206.1 (191.1, 222.0) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Moore County 6 stable similar 7 138.2 (95.2, 197.0) 0.8 -0.4 (-3.2, 2.9)
Morgan County 4 stable higher 32 226.9 (192.1, 266.5) 1.3 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.5)
Obion County 5 falling higher 49 241.4 (210.9, 275.4) 1.4 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Overton County 4 stable higher 39 257.2 (220.9, 298.3) 1.5 -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Perry County 6 stable similar 11 167.6 (125.4, 221.4) 1.0 -2.3 (-4.6, 0.2)
Pickett County 4 stable higher 12 249.3 (186.7, 332.6) 1.5 0.3 (-1.8, 2.9)
Polk County 5 falling higher 29 230.4 (192.3, 274.5) 1.3 -1.9 (-3.4, -0.1)
Putnam County 4 stable higher 94 216.2 (196.4, 237.4) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Rhea County 4 stable higher 53 251.8 (221.1, 285.8) 1.5 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Roane County 8 falling similar 81 190.0 (171.2, 210.7) 1.1 -2.2 (-2.9, -1.6)
Robertson County 5 falling higher 88 228.5 (206.2, 252.6) 1.3 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Rutherford County 5 falling higher 253 196.3 (184.6, 208.4) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Scott County 4 stable higher 28 208.2 (174.1, 247.4) 1.2 -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Sequatchie County 6 stable similar 23 196.6 (160.4, 239.4) 1.1 9.8 (-4.5, 31.9)
Sevier County 4 stable higher 135 208.3 (192.0, 225.7) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Shelby County 5 falling higher 841 202.1 (195.7, 208.6) 1.2 -1.9 (-2.2, -1.5)
Smith County 4 stable higher 28 221.6 (184.7, 264.2) 1.3 0.9 (-2.5, 7.1)
Stewart County 4 stable higher 21 225.0 (182.4, 275.3) 1.3 -1.4 (-3.2, 0.5)
Sullivan County 5 falling higher 242 213.5 (201.2, 226.3) 1.2 -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Sumner County 5 falling higher 201 192.2 (180.0, 205.1) 1.1 -3.6 (-8.0, 0.0)
Tipton County 5 falling higher 77 238.7 (214.2, 265.3) 1.4 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Trousdale County 6 stable similar 12 223.3 (167.8, 290.9) 1.3 -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Unicoi County 5 falling higher 29 218.1 (183.0, 258.8) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Union County 4 stable higher 34 258.1 (217.8, 304.3) 1.5 -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Van Buren County 6 stable similar 11 220.0 (161.9, 295.1) 1.3 -0.2 (-3.0, 3.1)
Warren County 4 stable higher 55 226.6 (199.5, 256.5) 1.3 -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Washington County 5 falling higher 174 205.7 (191.8, 220.4) 1.2 -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Wayne County 4 stable higher 26 236.0 (196.0, 282.3) 1.4 -0.7 (-2.5, 1.3)
Weakley County 5 falling higher 44 218.8 (190.0, 251.0) 1.3 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
White County 5 falling higher 42 224.8 (194.4, 259.1) 1.3 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Williamson County 7 stable lower 171 140.0 (130.4, 150.2) 0.8 2.7 (-3.1, 7.3)
Wilson County 8 falling similar 151 186.1 (172.2, 200.9) 1.1 -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/25/2026 10:16 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States do not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top