Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Iowa Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by rateratio
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 315,770 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) - -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Iowa - falling falling trend - 3,407 185.3 (182.5, 188.1) - -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
Winneshiek County 9 falling falling trend lower 19 132.2 (106.5, 163.1) 0.7 -1.8 (-2.9, -0.8)
Sioux County 9 falling falling trend lower 28 142.3 (119.2, 168.7) 0.8 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Johnson County 9 falling falling trend lower 87 146.0 (132.1, 160.9) 0.8 -9.4 (-17.9, -0.1)
Taylor County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 150.1 (103.4, 213.5) 0.8 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Story County 9 falling falling trend lower 61 150.8 (134.1, 169.1) 0.8 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Buena Vista County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 152.2 (121.5, 188.5) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Jefferson County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 153.2 (122.2, 190.3) 0.9 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Howard County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 156.9 (116.9, 207.9) 0.9 -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Kossuth County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 156.9 (127.0, 193.2) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Jones County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 157.0 (129.6, 189.2) 0.9 -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3)
Hancock County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 158.6 (122.1, 204.2) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Crawford County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 159.2 (126.5, 198.1) 0.9 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Franklin County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 159.8 (120.5, 209.3) 0.9 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Dallas County 8 falling falling trend similar 59 159.9 (141.8, 179.6) 0.9 -2.9 (-3.7, -2.0)
Audubon County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 161.7 (114.5, 227.0) 0.9 -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Hamilton County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 164.1 (130.4, 204.7) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Winnebago County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 168.0 (127.3, 219.0) 0.9 -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Humboldt County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 168.1 (126.1, 221.1) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.9, -0.8)
Page County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 168.1 (135.6, 206.9) 0.9 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Appanoose County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 168.3 (134.3, 210.1) 0.9 -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Wright County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 168.4 (132.2, 212.7) 0.9 -2.3 (-3.1, -1.4)
Bremer County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 168.7 (141.2, 200.5) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Warren County 8 falling falling trend similar 46 168.9 (147.2, 192.9) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Osceola County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 170.5 (122.3, 235.1) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
O'Brien County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 173.7 (139.1, 215.5) 1.0 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Dickinson County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 175.0 (144.5, 211.2) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Clay County 6 stable stable trend similar 21 175.1 (142.4, 214.0) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Dubuque County 8 falling falling trend similar 99 175.2 (159.9, 191.8) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Guthrie County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 175.7 (136.9, 223.9) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Mitchell County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 176.4 (136.4, 226.1) 1.0 -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Washington County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 176.5 (146.4, 211.4) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Clayton County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 176.9 (146.2, 213.1) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Allamakee County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 177.3 (141.1, 221.0) 1.0 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Louisa County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 177.8 (135.5, 229.7) 1.0 -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Benton County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 178.1 (150.4, 209.7) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Fayette County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 178.9 (147.8, 215.3) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Keokuk County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 179.0 (137.4, 230.8) 1.0 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Lyon County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 179.8 (138.8, 229.9) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Delaware County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 181.8 (148.3, 221.2) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Linn County 8 falling falling trend similar 223 183.8 (173.0, 195.2) 1.0 -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Scott County 8 falling falling trend similar 176 183.9 (171.6, 196.8) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Fremont County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 184.5 (135.1, 248.9) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Harrison County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 185.2 (148.0, 229.7) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Plymouth County 6 stable stable trend similar 30 185.2 (156.0, 218.6) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Poweshiek County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 186.2 (153.8, 224.4) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Davis County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 187.2 (138.0, 248.8) 1.1 -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Carroll County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 188.0 (156.3, 224.8) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Sac County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 188.1 (144.7, 242.2) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Marshall County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 188.6 (165.0, 214.8) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Adair County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 188.6 (137.7, 254.4) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Woodbury County 8 falling falling trend similar 100 189.2 (172.5, 207.1) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Shelby County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 189.9 (151.0, 237.7) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Clinton County 8 falling falling trend similar 60 190.0 (168.6, 213.6) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Mills County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 190.9 (153.2, 235.7) 1.1 -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Cedar County 6 stable stable trend similar 25 191.4 (158.2, 230.1) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Boone County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 191.4 (161.6, 225.4) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Chickasaw County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 192.4 (151.9, 241.6) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Floyd County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 192.4 (158.2, 233.0) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Iowa County 6 stable stable trend similar 21 192.5 (156.2, 235.3) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Polk County 8 falling falling trend similar 417 192.6 (184.1, 201.3) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Webster County 8 falling falling trend similar 44 192.6 (167.5, 220.6) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Buchanan County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 193.1 (159.9, 231.5) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Muscatine County 8 falling falling trend similar 48 193.1 (168.7, 220.2) 1.1 -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Jackson County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 193.3 (161.1, 230.9) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Jasper County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 193.9 (169.6, 220.9) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Black Hawk County 8 falling falling trend similar 140 194.1 (179.7, 209.4) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Cerro Gordo County 2 rising rising trend similar 58 194.7 (172.4, 219.3) 1.1 6.5 (2.0, 11.3)
Butler County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 195.0 (158.9, 237.9) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Tama County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 195.3 (159.9, 236.9) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Des Moines County 8 falling falling trend similar 53 195.9 (172.5, 221.9) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Henry County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 196.0 (162.6, 234.7) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Calhoun County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 199.1 (155.3, 252.9) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Wapello County 8 falling falling trend similar 43 200.8 (174.2, 230.5) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Lee County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 201.2 (175.5, 230.0) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Grundy County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 201.6 (160.9, 250.6) 1.1 -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Mahaska County 6 stable stable trend similar 28 201.6 (168.9, 239.1) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Lucas County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 203.6 (157.4, 261.2) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Worth County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 204.1 (153.3, 268.6) 1.2 -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Cherokee County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 204.6 (163.7, 254.3) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Monona County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 208.4 (161.5, 267.1) 1.2 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Marion County 5 falling falling trend higher 42 210.9 (182.9, 242.1) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Hardin County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 213.3 (178.0, 254.5) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Adams County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 215.2 (139.1, 322.8) 1.2 -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Pottawattamie County 5 falling falling trend higher 119 215.9 (198.4, 234.6) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Madison County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 217.2 (176.1, 265.4) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Montgomery County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 220.3 (172.9, 278.3) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Emmet County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 223.4 (173.6, 284.5) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Decatur County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 224.0 (167.7, 294.7) 1.3 -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Union County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 226.0 (180.8, 280.0) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Monroe County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 226.4 (171.2, 295.5) 1.3 0.3 (-1.1, 1.6)
Ida County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 230.0 (176.2, 298.2) 1.3 -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Wayne County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 234.7 (173.0, 313.4) 1.3 -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Clarke County 4 stable stable trend higher 14 234.8 (181.7, 299.4) 1.3 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Cass County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 236.1 (193.1, 287.0) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Greene County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 241.0 (189.4, 304.0) 1.4 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Palo Alto County 5 falling falling trend higher 16 241.8 (190.3, 304.7) 1.4 -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Pocahontas County 4 stable stable trend higher 13 242.5 (185.5, 314.6) 1.4 -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Van Buren County 4 stable stable trend higher 13 246.0 (189.4, 316.5) 1.4 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Ringgold County 4 stable stable trend higher 13 326.4 (249.8, 423.2) 1.8 1.3 (-0.2, 2.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/03/2024 4:08 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top