Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

California Counties versus United States

Liver & Bile Duct

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by name
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 27,509 6.6 (6.6, 6.7) - -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
California - falling falling trend - 3,488 7.6 (7.5, 7.8) - -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Alameda County 2 rising rising trend similar 135 7.2 (6.6, 7.7) 1.1 1.1 (0.5, 1.7)
Alpine County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Amador County
**
** similar 7 9.1 (6.3, 13.2) 1.4
**
Butte County 2 rising rising trend similar 22 7.0 (5.7, 8.5) 1.1 2.4 (1.3, 3.5)
Calaveras County
**
** lower 4 4.3 (2.5, 7.4) 0.6
**
Colusa County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Contra Costa County 2 rising rising trend similar 96 6.6 (6.0, 7.2) 1.0 2.0 (1.4, 2.7)
Del Norte County
**
** similar 5 11.4 (7.1, 17.7) 1.7
**
El Dorado County 7 stable stable trend lower 14 4.5 (3.5, 5.7) 0.7 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Fresno County 1 rising rising trend higher 93 9.5 (8.7, 10.4) 1.4 2.2 (1.7, 2.7)
Glenn County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Humboldt County 1 rising rising trend higher 16 8.7 (6.8, 10.9) 1.3 2.4 (0.6, 4.2)
Imperial County 4 stable stable trend higher 17 9.5 (7.6, 11.8) 1.4 0.8 (-0.5, 2.1)
Inyo County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Kern County 1 rising rising trend higher 71 8.6 (7.7, 9.6) 1.3 3.9 (3.0, 4.7)
Kings County
**
** similar 11 8.1 (6.1, 10.6) 1.2
**
Lake County 2 rising rising trend similar 10 9.2 (6.6, 12.6) 1.4 15.8 (0.6, 33.5)
Lassen County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Los Angeles County 4 stable stable trend higher 891 7.9 (7.7, 8.2) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Madera County 1 rising rising trend higher 17 9.8 (7.8, 12.2) 1.5 3.5 (2.1, 4.9)
Marin County 7 stable stable trend lower 22 5.0 (4.1, 6.1) 0.8 1.2 (-0.2, 2.5)
Mariposa County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Mendocino County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 6.4 (4.6, 8.8) 1.0 1.0 (-0.9, 2.9)
Merced County 1 rising rising trend higher 24 9.5 (7.9, 11.4) 1.4 2.7 (1.5, 3.9)
Modoc County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Mono County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Monterey County 2 rising rising trend similar 35 7.3 (6.2, 8.5) 1.1 2.7 (1.6, 3.8)
Napa County 2 rising rising trend similar 14 6.7 (5.2, 8.6) 1.0 2.3 (0.7, 3.9)
Nevada County 7 stable stable trend lower 10 4.8 (3.6, 6.6) 0.7 1.0 (-0.3, 2.3)
Orange County 6 stable stable trend similar 265 7.0 (6.6, 7.4) 1.1 -3.7 (-9.0, 1.9)
Placer County 3 rising rising trend lower 31 5.4 (4.5, 6.3) 0.8 1.9 (0.7, 3.0)
Plumas County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Riverside County 1 rising rising trend higher 207 7.4 (7.0, 7.9) 1.1 2.9 (1.2, 4.5)
Sacramento County 5 falling falling trend higher 149 8.5 (7.9, 9.2) 1.3 -7.3 (-13.7, -0.6)
San Benito County
**
** similar 5 7.1 (4.5, 10.6) 1.1
**
San Bernardino County 1 rising rising trend higher 187 8.8 (8.3, 9.4) 1.3 3.1 (2.5, 3.7)
San Diego County 4 stable stable trend higher 289 7.6 (7.2, 8.0) 1.1 -0.6 (-3.5, 2.4)
San Francisco County 5 falling falling trend higher 95 8.7 (7.9, 9.5) 1.3 -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
San Joaquin County 4 stable stable trend higher 75 9.5 (8.6, 10.6) 1.4 -2.1 (-7.8, 3.9)
San Luis Obispo County 2 rising rising trend similar 25 6.0 (4.9, 7.2) 0.9 2.8 (1.7, 3.8)
San Mateo County 2 rising rising trend similar 67 6.8 (6.1, 7.6) 1.0 1.7 (1.0, 2.5)
Santa Barbara County 2 rising rising trend similar 37 7.0 (6.0, 8.1) 1.1 2.4 (1.5, 3.3)
Santa Clara County 4 stable stable trend higher 166 7.7 (7.2, 8.3) 1.2 -1.7 (-4.8, 1.5)
Santa Cruz County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 6.0 (4.9, 7.3) 0.9 -0.3 (-3.3, 2.7)
Shasta County 2 rising rising trend similar 19 6.4 (5.2, 7.9) 1.0 2.3 (0.8, 3.9)
Sierra County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Siskiyou County
**
** similar 4 4.8 (2.9, 7.8) 0.7
**
Solano County 1 rising rising trend higher 57 10.0 (8.8, 11.3) 1.5 4.2 (3.2, 5.1)
Sonoma County 2 rising rising trend similar 52 6.9 (6.1, 7.8) 1.0 1.7 (0.6, 2.8)
Stanislaus County 1 rising rising trend higher 48 8.2 (7.2, 9.3) 1.2 3.8 (2.6, 4.9)
Sutter County 2 rising rising trend similar 10 8.7 (6.4, 11.5) 1.3 3.3 (1.8, 4.8)
Tehama County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 7.3 (4.9, 10.5) 1.1 1.0 (-0.8, 3.0)
Trinity County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Tulare County 1 rising rising trend higher 36 8.2 (7.1, 9.5) 1.2 2.5 (1.6, 3.5)
Tuolumne County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 6.8 (4.7, 9.8) 1.0 0.7 (-1.0, 2.5)
Ventura County 3 rising rising trend lower 63 5.9 (5.2, 6.6) 0.9 1.9 (1.2, 2.7)
Yolo County 2 rising rising trend similar 17 7.3 (5.8, 9.1) 1.1 2.5 (0.9, 4.0)
Yuba County
**
** higher 9 10.9 (7.9, 14.7) 1.6
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/02/2024 6:28 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Alpine County, Colusa County, Glenn County, Inyo County, Lassen County, Mariposa County, Modoc County, Mono County, Plumas County, Sierra County, Trinity County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Amador County, Calaveras County, Del Norte County, Kings County, San Benito County, Siskiyou County, Yuba County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top