Interpretation of Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer Data
Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2019-2023
Oklahoma Counties versus United States
Breast
All Races, Female
Sorted by priority index
Explanation of Column HeadersState/County - The site and sex combination for this comparison.
Priority Index 1 - The priority index is based upon the direction of the trend and the rate comparison. An index of 1 is the highest priority - that trend is rising and the rate is already higher. An index of 9 is the lowest priority - the trend is falling and the rate is already lower.
Recent Trends - This is an interpretation of the AAPC:
- Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
- Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
- Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
AAPC (95% Confidence Interval) - The Average Annual Percent Change is the change in rate over time. These AAPCs are based upon APCs that were calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program
Other Notes
- Larger confidence intervals indicate less stability of the data. This is often due to low counts that are not quite low enough to be suppressed.
- Data is currently being suppressed if there are fewer than 16 counts for the time period.
Line by Line Interpretation of the Report
United States
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is falling because the trend is -1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.7 to -1.3.
- Rate : The death rate is 19.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 19.1 to 19.3 and 42,257 average annual deaths.
Oklahoma
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is falling because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.0 to -0.4.
- Rate : The death rate is 22.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 21.4 to 23.1 and 557 average annual deaths.
Carter County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 4.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to 1.8.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is higher compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 28.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 20.8 to 38.5 and 9 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.5
McCurtain County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 4.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to 5.2.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is higher compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 34.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 23.7 to 48.3 and 7 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.8
Sequoyah County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 4.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.7 to 4.2.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is higher compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 32.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 23.1 to 43.6 and 9 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.7
Oklahoma County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 5.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is falling because the trend is -0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.5 to -0.2.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is higher compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 23.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 21.6 to 25.6 and 108 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.2
Bryan County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.0 to 1.9.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 18.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 12.4 to 27.5 and 6 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.0
Canadian County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.5 to 0.7.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 22.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 17.8 to 27.0 and 19 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.2
Cherokee County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.6 to 2.1.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 22.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 15.6 to 31.3 and 7 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.2
Cleveland County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.5 to 1.2.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 20.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 17.7 to 24.1 and 35 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.1
Comanche County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.1 to 0.6.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 24.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 19.0 to 30.0 and 16 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.3
Creek County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -31.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -53.1 to 1.6.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 25.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 19.3 to 32.3 and 13 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.3
Custer County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.8 to 1.0.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 21.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 11.8 to 35.1 and 3 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.1
Delaware County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 2.8.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 20.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 13.2 to 31.1 and 6 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.1
Garfield County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.8 to 2.5.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 24.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 17.2 to 32.8 and 9 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.3
Garvin County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.9 to 6.5.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 18.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 10.5 to 31.6 and 3 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.0
Grady County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.8 to 4.3.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 21.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 14.8 to 29.4 and 8 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.1
Le Flore County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.8 to 1.2.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 24.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 17.1 to 33.4 and 8 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.3
Lincoln County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.3 to 1.3.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 20.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 13.1 to 30.4 and 5 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.1
Logan County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.2 to 2.7.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 20.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 14.0 to 29.9 and 6 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.1
Mayes County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.0 to 5.2.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 26.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 18.3 to 38.2 and 7 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.4
McClain County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is 2.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.0 to 6.6.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 28.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 19.9 to 39.8 and 7 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.5
Muskogee County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.6 to 1.5.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 23.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 17.4 to 31.7 and 10 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.2
Okmulgee County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.6 to 1.3.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 23.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 16.1 to 34.6 and 6 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.2
Osage County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.9 to 2.6.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 19.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 13.3 to 28.0 and 7 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.0
Ottawa County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -2.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.0 to 0.7.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 19.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 11.6 to 29.9 and 4 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.0
Payne County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.4 to 2.3.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 22.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 16.2 to 30.2 and 9 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.2
Pittsburg County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.1 to 2.3.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 24.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 16.7 to 33.7 and 8 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.3
Pottawatomie County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.8 to 3.0.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 24.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 18.2 to 31.7 and 12 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.3
Rogers County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.4 to 2.7.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 22.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 17.0 to 28.0 and 14 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.1
Stephens County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.0 to 3.7.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 22.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 15.6 to 31.9 and 8 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.2
Wagoner County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.7 to 2.1.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 19.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 14.8 to 26.4 and 11 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.0
Washington County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 6.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.7 to 2.0.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 24.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 17.3 to 33.2 and 9 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.3
Pontotoc County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 7.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is stable because the trend is -2.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.9 to 0.7.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is lower compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 10.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 6.2 to 18.2 and 3 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 0.6
Tulsa County
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index is 8.
- Recent Trend(2) : The trend is falling because the trend is -2.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.0 to -1.1.
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 20.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 18.2 to 22.2 and 82 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.1
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 30.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 18.4 to 48.9 and 4 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.6
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 30.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 18.8 to 46.1 and 5 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.6
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is higher compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 45.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 26.7 to 72.4 and 4 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 2.3
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 23.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 16.7 to 33.2 and 8 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.2
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 23.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 14.1 to 38.1 and 4 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.2
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : This death rate is similar compared to the US rate
- Rate : The death rate is 30.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 19.4 to 46.1 and 5 average annual deaths.
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : The rate ratio is 1.6
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
- Priority Index(1) : The priority index cannot be determined.
- Recent Trend(2) : **
- County Death Rate Compared to US Rate : *
- Rate : *
- Rate Ratio(3) County to US : *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 9:13 am.
Rising
when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.Stable
when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.Falling
when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.Rate Comparison
Above
when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10Similar
when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.Below
when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Adair County, Alfalfa County, Atoka County, Beaver County, Blaine County, Choctaw County, Cimarron County, Coal County, Cotton County, Craig County, Dewey County, Ellis County, Grant County, Greer County, Harmon County, Harper County, Haskell County, Jackson County, Jefferson County, Johnston County, Kingfisher County, Kiowa County, Latimer County, Love County, Major County, Marshall County, Murray County, Noble County, Nowata County, Okfuskee County, Pawnee County, Pushmataha County, Roger Mills County, Texas County, Tillman County, Washita County, Woods County, Woodward County
Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Beckham County, Caddo County, Hughes County, Kay County, McIntosh County, Seminole County
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States do not include Puerto Rico.


