Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, death years through 2013
South Dakota Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites
All Races, Both Sexes
Sorted by Priority Index
County
sort state ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

sort index descending
Recent
Trend2

County Death Rate
Compared to
US Rate

Average Deaths per year
2009-2013

sort count ascending
Annual
Death
Rate
2009-2013

deaths per 100,000

(95% Confidence Interval)
sort death rate ascending
Rate
Ratio3
County to USsort ascending by the rate ratio
Recent Average Annual
Percent Change2
in Death Rates

(95% Confidence Interval)
sort AAPC ascending
Recent Trend Period2
United States-falling  -577,303168.5 (168.3, 168.7)-0.0-1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)2009 - 2013
South Dakota8falling  similar  1,606162.5 (158.9, 166.2)1.0-1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)2009 - 2013
Sanborn County2rising  similar  5143.0 (92.0, 217.0)0.851.0 (16.8, 95.2)2009 - 2013
Todd County4stable  above  13238.8 (181.4, 306.8)1.4-1.6 (-3.4, 0.3)2009 - 2013
Aurora County6stable  similar  7158.3 (109.3, 226.0)0.9-1.0 (-3.2, 1.2)2009 - 2013
Bennett County6stable  similar  6170.0 (112.7, 246.2)1.0-1.2 (-4.1, 1.7)2009 - 2013
Bon Homme County6stable  similar  16145.0 (113.6, 183.6)0.9-0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)2009 - 2013
Brookings County6stable  similar  45162.6 (141.8, 185.6)1.0-0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)2009 - 2013
Brule County6stable  similar  13174.9 (133.8, 225.7)1.0-0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)2009 - 2013
Butte County6stable  similar  26194.3 (162.2, 231.4)1.2-0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)2009 - 2013
Charles Mix County6stable  similar  24181.9 (149.8, 219.5)1.1-0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)2009 - 2013
Clark County6stable  similar  10138.4 (101.0, 188.8)0.8-1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)2009 - 2013
Clay County6stable  similar  21170.9 (138.9, 208.0)1.0-0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)2009 - 2013
Corson County6stable  similar  7195.9 (136.0, 272.6)1.2-1.0 (-2.9, 0.8)2009 - 2013
Custer County6stable  similar  22158.7 (128.7, 195.2)0.9-1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)2009 - 2013
Davison County6stable  similar  41151.2 (130.4, 174.6)0.9-1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)2009 - 2013
Day County6stable  similar  17150.3 (119.0, 189.7)0.9-1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)2009 - 2013
Dewey County6stable  similar  10229.8 (169.9, 303.1)1.40.1 (-1.8, 2.0)2009 - 2013
Douglas County6stable  similar  9166.5 (115.1, 236.5)1.0-0.8 (-3.0, 1.5)2009 - 2013
Edmunds County6stable  similar  11162.6 (122.3, 215.0)1.0-1.7 (-3.5, 0.2)2009 - 2013
Fall River County6stable  similar  25187.8 (155.6, 226.9)1.1-0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)2009 - 2013
Faulk County6stable  similar  6146.6 (97.0, 218.1)0.9-1.7 (-4.2, 0.8)2009 - 2013
Grant County6stable  similar  16150.3 (118.3, 189.4)0.9-0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)2009 - 2013
Gregory County6stable  similar  13169.4 (127.4, 223.6)1.0-0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)2009 - 2013
Haakon County6stable  similar  6170.8 (109.2, 261.5)1.0-0.6 (-3.6, 2.6)2009 - 2013
Hamlin County6stable  similar  12145.4 (109.6, 190.1)0.9-0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)2009 - 2013
Hand County6stable  similar  8130.6 (89.6, 187.6)0.8-1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)2009 - 2013
Hanson County6stable  similar  5154.1 (100.6, 226.4)0.9-0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)2009 - 2013
Hughes County6stable  similar  33162.5 (138.0, 190.2)1.0-0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)2009 - 2013
Jackson County6stable  similar  5148.3 (95.1, 220.9)0.9-2.0 (-4.4, 0.4)2009 - 2013
Jerauld County6stable  similar  6161.3 (103.8, 245.8)1.00.6 (-1.7, 3.0)2009 - 2013
Kingsbury County6stable  similar  15165.5 (129.4, 210.9)1.0-1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)2009 - 2013
Lake County6stable  similar  26155.3 (129.2, 185.8)0.9-1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)2009 - 2013
Lawrence County6stable  similar  55161.8 (142.8, 182.9)1.0-0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)2009 - 2013
Marshall County6stable  similar  14187.6 (144.7, 241.3)1.10.4 (-1.2, 2.0)2009 - 2013
McCook County6stable  similar  17202.5 (160.7, 253.3)1.20.1 (-1.5, 1.8)2009 - 2013
Meade County6stable  similar  40147.9 (127.8, 170.3)0.9-1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)2009 - 2013
Mellette County6stable  similar  5240.1 (156.7, 352.8)1.40.6 (-1.7, 2.9)2009 - 2013
Miner County6stable  similar  8183.1 (128.9, 258.6)1.1-0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)2009 - 2013
Moody County6stable  similar  14166.0 (128.3, 212.0)1.00.2 (-1.1, 1.7)2009 - 2013
Perkins County6stable  similar  11209.6 (154.6, 282.0)1.21.1 (-1.3, 3.6)2009 - 2013
Potter County6stable  similar  8145.7 (102.5, 210.7)0.9-0.4 (-2.5, 1.7)2009 - 2013
Roberts County6stable  similar  25179.9 (148.7, 216.2)1.1-0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)2009 - 2013
Spink County6stable  similar  17153.9 (121.9, 193.5)0.9-1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)2009 - 2013
Sully County6stable  similar  4179.1 (107.6, 289.7)1.1-1.5 (-4.7, 1.8)2009 - 2013
Tripp County6stable  similar  15162.1 (126.6, 206.3)1.0-0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)2009 - 2013
McPherson County7stable  below  597.3 (61.6, 155.6)0.630.1 (-5.8, 79.6)2009 - 2013
Beadle County8falling  similar  40161.7 (139.4, 186.9)1.0-1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)2009 - 2013
Brown County8falling  similar  74154.6 (138.8, 171.8)0.9-1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)2009 - 2013
Codington County8falling  similar  56166.4 (147.2, 187.5)1.0-1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)2009 - 2013
Lyman County8falling  similar  6136.6 (92.3, 196.0)0.8-2.7 (-4.8, -0.5)2009 - 2013
Minnehaha County8falling  similar  312184.3 (175.1, 193.9)1.1-0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)2009 - 2013
Pennington County8falling  similar  187159.7 (149.5, 170.5)0.9-1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)2009 - 2013
Shannon County8falling  similar  16217.9 (170.5, 273.3)1.3-1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)2009 - 2013
Stanley County8falling  similar  6159.7 (104.9, 234.3)0.9-2.4 (-4.6, -0.1)2009 - 2013
Turner County8falling  similar  20154.3 (124.3, 190.3)0.9-2.5 (-3.8, -1.3)2009 - 2013
Union County8falling  similar  29166.5 (139.9, 196.9)1.0-1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)2009 - 2013
Walworth County8falling  similar  15146.4 (114.3, 187.1)0.9-1.8 (-3.5, -0.2)2009 - 2013
Deuel County9falling  below  8113.9 (81.1, 158.1)0.7-2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)2009 - 2013
Hutchinson County9falling  below  18130.4 (102.2, 165.6)0.8-2.1 (-3.9, -0.4)2009 - 2013
Lincoln County9falling  below  46120.0 (104.5, 137.0)0.7-6.8 (-9.8, -3.8)2009 - 2013
Yankton County9falling  below  41137.1 (118.5, 158.0)0.8-1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)2009 - 2013
Buffalo County
*
**
*
*
*
*
**
**
Campbell County
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Harding County
*
**
*
*
*
*
**
**
Hyde County
*
**
*
*
*
*
**
**
Jones County
*
**
*
*
*
*
**
**
Ziebach County
*
**
*
*
*
*
**
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/29/2016 1:18 am.
Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trendestimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program (Version 4.3.0.0). Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate.

Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).