Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Monroe County Rural No 304.3 (236.7, 387.7) 1 (1, 54) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Lawrence County Rural No 298.3 (252.5, 350.6) 2 (1, 33) 31 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.7, 4.5)
Phillips County Rural No 296.5 (247.4, 352.9) 3 (1, 37) 28 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.3, -0.2)
Poinsett County Urban No 292.0 (250.8, 338.3) 4 (1, 32) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Chicot County Rural No 289.4 (234.4, 354.7) 5 (1, 54) 20 stable stable trend 0.6 (-5.7, 8.5)
Arkansas County Rural No 275.1 (231.0, 325.8) 6 (1, 45) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Dallas County Rural No 269.9 (202.6, 354.7) 7 (1, 73) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 0.8)
Clay County Rural No 263.4 (220.2, 313.7) 8 (1, 57) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Randolph County Rural No 261.4 (221.5, 306.9) 9 (1, 53) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Jackson County Rural No 259.2 (215.8, 309.4) 10 (1, 63) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.3)
Cross County Rural No 258.5 (215.8, 307.7) 11 (1, 59) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Calhoun County Rural No 254.4 (186.1, 344.2) 12 (1, 75) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Searcy County Rural No 254.1 (202.1, 318.3) 13 (1, 70) 17 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.1)
Crittenden County Urban No 253.4 (223.8, 285.9) 14 (2, 48) 58 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Mississippi County Rural No 251.9 (221.1, 285.8) 15 (2, 49) 53 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Lee County Rural No 249.1 (195.3, 314.6) 16 (1, 74) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.9)
Desha County Rural No 248.3 (195.3, 312.3) 17 (1, 73) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Cleveland County Rural No 245.9 (190.3, 315.3) 18 (1, 74) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.4)
Scott County Rural No 245.6 (196.7, 304.4) 19 (1, 72) 18 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 0.9)
Nevada County Rural No 238.1 (184.6, 304.1) 20 (1, 74) 14 rising rising trend 16.8 (4.4, 27.1)
Drew County Rural No 236.2 (194.2, 284.9) 21 (2, 71) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Jefferson County Rural No 235.8 (213.5, 259.8) 22 (8, 52) 90 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.6)
Clark County Rural No 234.9 (195.9, 279.9) 23 (3, 70) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Franklin County Rural No 234.0 (195.6, 278.3) 24 (3, 70) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.8)
Greene County Rural No 233.4 (206.9, 262.4) 25 (6, 61) 59 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Union County Rural No 229.4 (202.3, 259.4) 26 (7, 64) 55 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Columbia County Rural No 229.1 (192.6, 270.7) 27 (4, 72) 29 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.2)
Ouachita County Rural No 228.7 (194.3, 268.0) 28 (4, 70) 34 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Logan County Rural No 227.6 (193.6, 266.4) 29 (5, 70) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Marion County Rural No 227.3 (192.6, 267.9) 30 (5, 70) 36 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Stone County Rural No 227.2 (187.8, 274.2) 31 (3, 73) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Hempstead County Rural No 224.8 (187.7, 267.5) 32 (5, 73) 27 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.8)
Yell County Rural No 222.5 (185.2, 265.4) 33 (4, 74) 27 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Fulton County Rural No 222.4 (183.0, 269.8) 34 (5, 74) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Pike County Rural No 221.1 (173.8, 278.5) 35 (2, 75) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Crawford County Urban No 220.6 (198.4, 244.6) 36 (12, 64) 78 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Lincoln County Rural No 220.1 (173.2, 276.0) 37 (3, 75) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Lonoke County Urban No 219.5 (197.6, 243.3) 38 (11, 64) 81 falling falling trend -3.1 (-7.7, -1.6)
Craighead County Urban No 215.7 (197.7, 235.0) 39 (15, 63) 111 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Miller County Urban No 215.1 (189.3, 243.6) 40 (11, 70) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Boone County Rural No 214.9 (189.6, 242.8) 41 (12, 71) 55 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Grant County Urban No 213.6 (177.2, 255.9) 42 (7, 74) 25 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.7)
Pope County Rural No 210.5 (189.3, 233.5) 43 (18, 69) 75 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Perry County Urban No 209.6 (164.1, 265.4) 44 (4, 75) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.9)
Prairie County Rural No 209.1 (160.9, 269.4) 45 (4, 75) 13 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.0, -0.2)
Van Buren County Rural No 208.1 (174.0, 248.3) 46 (9, 74) 29 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.2)
Ashley County Rural No 206.8 (173.8, 245.3) 47 (11, 75) 28 falling falling trend -9.9 (-20.1, -2.3)
Carroll County Rural No 205.6 (178.7, 236.0) 48 (14, 74) 45 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Sebastian County Urban No 204.6 (189.5, 220.5) 49 (26, 67) 146 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Polk County Rural No 204.0 (171.3, 242.1) 50 (12, 75) 29 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Madison County Urban No 202.7 (166.5, 245.0) 51 (9, 75) 23 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Hot Spring County Rural No 202.3 (176.3, 231.3) 52 (16, 74) 46 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Sharp County Rural No 201.6 (169.9, 238.6) 53 (13, 75) 30 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Sevier County Rural No 201.5 (158.6, 252.4) 54 (6, 75) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
White County Rural No 200.5 (181.5, 221.0) 55 (26, 72) 86 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Howard County Rural No 198.6 (156.2, 249.7) 56 (8, 75) 15 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -1.2)
Johnson County Rural No 198.5 (167.6, 233.8) 57 (14, 75) 31 falling falling trend -1.7 (-4.3, -0.7)
Izard County Rural No 197.6 (163.1, 238.6) 58 (13, 75) 24 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Pulaski County Urban No 197.4 (188.5, 206.6) 59 (40, 66) 400 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.5)
Cleburne County Rural No 195.9 (170.4, 225.1) 60 (20, 75) 45 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Woodruff County Rural No 193.6 (138.2, 266.5) 61 (3, 75) 8 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.3, -0.9)
Little River County Urban No 192.0 (150.7, 242.3) 62 (8, 75) 15 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.4)
Baxter County Rural No 190.0 (170.6, 211.5) 63 (33, 75) 79 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Lafayette County Rural No 186.1 (137.1, 251.3) 64 (7, 75) 10 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.1)
Garland County Urban No 186.1 (172.3, 200.9) 65 (43, 74) 143 falling falling trend -1.9 (-5.0, -1.1)
Conway County Rural No 185.2 (153.3, 222.3) 66 (19, 75) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Newton County Rural No 183.2 (139.0, 240.9) 67 (11, 75) 12 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.2)
Washington County Urban No 183.1 (171.0, 195.9) 68 (48, 74) 183 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Faulkner County Urban No 179.8 (164.1, 196.6) 69 (44, 75) 102 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
St. Francis County Rural No 178.0 (147.2, 213.5) 70 (25, 75) 25 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.1, -2.2)
Independence County Rural No 177.9 (154.0, 204.6) 71 (36, 75) 41 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.6)
Bradley County Rural No 177.1 (132.1, 233.2) 72 (11, 75) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.0, -0.2)
Saline County Urban No 175.5 (162.1, 189.7) 73 (54, 75) 134 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Benton County Urban No 174.9 (164.8, 185.4) 74 (58, 75) 236 falling falling trend -1.9 (-6.0, -0.8)
Montgomery County Rural No 165.4 (124.7, 218.0) 75 (20, 75) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.4, 1.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 12:59 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top