Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Idaho by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Lewis County Rural No 269.1 (184.3, 385.1) 1 (1, 30) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 3.9)
Butte County Urban No 235.9 (143.8, 371.0) 2 (1, 40) 5 rising rising trend 5.5 (0.1, 25.2)
Shoshone County Rural No 214.4 (173.9, 262.7) 3 (1, 26) 22 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Caribou County Rural No 202.5 (143.6, 278.2) 4 (1, 39) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.2, 2.8)
Oneida County Rural No 196.1 (131.8, 284.1) 5 (1, 40) 6
*
*
Boundary County Rural No 191.4 (151.7, 239.4) 6 (1, 35) 18 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.3)
Elmore County Rural No 189.0 (157.5, 225.1) 7 (1, 32) 27 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.6)
Nez Perce County Urban No 181.7 (160.3, 205.4) 8 (3, 30) 54 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Twin Falls County Urban No 180.2 (163.3, 198.3) 9 (3, 26) 88 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Washington County Rural No 179.2 (141.5, 226.0) 10 (2, 38) 17 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 1.0)
Benewah County Rural No 177.7 (135.9, 230.1) 11 (1, 40) 13 stable stable trend -2.5 (-22.3, 1.2)
Minidoka County Rural No 176.0 (143.4, 213.9) 12 (2, 38) 21 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.0)
Kootenai County Urban No 175.7 (164.1, 187.8) 13 (5, 25) 190 falling falling trend -6.5 (-9.6, -2.3)
Bannock County Urban No 175.2 (156.8, 195.0) 14 (4, 30) 73 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Canyon County Urban No 173.4 (162.3, 185.0) 15 (6, 26) 198 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.2)
Lincoln County Rural No 171.9 (110.5, 255.8) 16 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 2.0)
Custer County Rural No 169.3 (113.8, 249.6) 17 (1, 42) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.2, 5.0)
Payette County Rural No 167.5 (140.4, 198.6) 18 (3, 37) 28 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Idaho County Rural No 166.5 (139.9, 198.2) 19 (4, 37) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.4)
Lemhi County Rural No 164.4 (125.4, 215.5) 20 (2, 41) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.9)
Teton County Rural No 163.3 (116.8, 221.9) 21 (1, 42) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.7, 7.3)
Latah County Rural No 161.8 (137.0, 190.0) 22 (4, 38) 32 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Bear Lake County Rural No 160.3 (108.9, 229.1) 23 (1, 42) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.1, 5.2)
Cassia County Rural No 159.7 (128.9, 195.5) 24 (4, 40) 19 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.8)
Bonner County Rural No 159.2 (140.8, 179.5) 25 (8, 37) 63 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Power County Rural No 155.4 (108.6, 216.5) 26 (2, 42) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 3.0)
Ada County Urban No 154.2 (147.3, 161.4) 27 (17, 34) 399 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Gooding County Rural No 153.6 (121.5, 192.3) 28 (4, 41) 16 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.0)
Bonneville County Urban No 153.3 (139.0, 168.7) 29 (13, 37) 88 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Owyhee County Urban No 151.5 (114.4, 197.5) 30 (3, 42) 12 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.2, -0.1)
Jerome County Urban No 151.0 (120.3, 187.0) 31 (5, 41) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.1)
Clearwater County Rural No 149.9 (116.5, 193.4) 32 (4, 41) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.9)
Bingham County Rural No 149.3 (128.3, 172.8) 33 (9, 39) 38 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Gem County Urban No 147.1 (120.9, 178.2) 34 (8, 40) 23 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.7)
Madison County Rural No 141.5 (108.2, 180.8) 35 (5, 42) 13 stable stable trend 15.7 (-0.2, 28.3)
Franklin County Urban No 132.8 (98.5, 175.3) 36 (7, 42) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.5)
Jefferson County Urban No 132.6 (105.7, 164.0) 37 (12, 42) 18 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.0, 0.2)
Fremont County Rural No 128.5 (96.8, 168.0) 38 (10, 42) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Adams County Rural No 125.6 (82.6, 192.4) 39 (4, 42) 6 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.1, 0.0)
Valley County Rural Yes 111.3 (82.9, 148.5) 40 (21, 42) 12 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.8, -2.7)
Boise County Urban Yes 108.3 (74.1, 157.3) 41 (16, 42) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.6, 2.0)
Blaine County Rural Yes 94.1 (74.5, 118.0) 42 (36, 42) 17 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.7, 0.6)
Camas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 5:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top