Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Palo Alto County Rural No 249.3 (195.9, 314.3) 1 (1, 76) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.3)
Emmet County Rural No 247.8 (195.3, 311.5) 2 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
Madison County Urban No 245.1 (200.4, 297.0) 3 (1, 63) 23 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.5)
Clarke County Rural No 240.2 (187.6, 303.9) 4 (1, 86) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.3)
Monroe County Rural No 239.7 (181.3, 312.4) 5 (1, 90) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.7)
Pocahontas County Rural No 233.6 (178.6, 302.9) 6 (1, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.7)
Ringgold County Rural No 232.6 (165.2, 322.3) 7 (1, 97) 8 stable stable trend -29.4 (-57.5, 0.0)
Greene County Rural No 223.5 (173.1, 285.6) 8 (1, 90) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.3)
Boone County Urban No 223.3 (190.2, 260.8) 9 (1, 67) 35 rising rising trend 8.1 (0.6, 12.9)
Winnebago County Rural No 215.8 (169.0, 272.8) 10 (1, 90) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.4)
Iowa County Rural No 214.9 (176.7, 259.5) 11 (1, 83) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Pottawattamie County Urban No 213.1 (195.7, 231.7) 12 (3, 47) 117 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Montgomery County Rural No 211.0 (166.0, 266.0) 13 (1, 93) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.3)
Adams County Rural No 210.5 (132.4, 321.2) 14 (1, 99) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.4)
Wapello County Rural No 208.7 (181.5, 239.1) 15 (2, 71) 44 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.2)
Van Buren County Rural No 208.0 (156.2, 273.7) 16 (1, 97) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.5)
Chickasaw County Rural No 206.2 (165.3, 255.5) 17 (1, 90) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Union County Rural No 206.2 (162.3, 259.2) 18 (1, 93) 16 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.2)
Des Moines County Rural No 203.4 (179.4, 230.1) 19 (4, 72) 54 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 7.3)
Marion County Rural No 203.1 (176.5, 232.9) 20 (3, 75) 43 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Franklin County Rural No 203.1 (158.4, 257.8) 21 (1, 95) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.2)
Webster County Rural No 201.9 (176.2, 230.4) 22 (4, 74) 47 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Decatur County Rural No 200.8 (148.3, 267.6) 23 (1, 98) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.6)
Page County Rural No 200.0 (164.4, 241.8) 24 (2, 91) 23 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.5)
Clinton County Rural No 199.3 (177.2, 223.7) 25 (6, 73) 62 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Harrison County Urban No 199.3 (160.8, 244.9) 26 (1, 92) 19 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.9)
Ida County Rural No 198.4 (147.6, 263.6) 27 (1, 98) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.7)
Wayne County Rural No 198.1 (141.9, 271.0) 28 (1, 99) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.2)
Clayton County Rural No 198.0 (165.4, 236.2) 29 (3, 87) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Audubon County Rural No 197.2 (138.5, 275.6) 30 (1, 99) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.4)
Jackson County Rural No 195.7 (163.6, 233.0) 31 (3, 89) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Cass County Rural No 195.4 (156.4, 242.2) 32 (2, 94) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Lucas County Rural No 195.1 (150.3, 251.0) 33 (1, 98) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.3)
Lee County Rural No 193.9 (169.1, 221.7) 34 (6, 82) 47 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Davis County Rural No 193.6 (143.4, 256.3) 35 (1, 98) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.9)
Calhoun County Rural No 191.7 (148.4, 245.1) 36 (2, 97) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.8)
Polk County Urban No 191.3 (183.0, 199.9) 37 (20, 60) 431 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Grundy County Urban No 190.7 (151.2, 238.4) 38 (2, 97) 16 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.4, 14.1)
Floyd County Rural No 189.6 (155.0, 230.7) 39 (3, 94) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 0.9)
Guthrie County Urban No 189.5 (148.2, 240.4) 40 (2, 97) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.5)
Black Hawk County Urban No 189.3 (175.1, 204.3) 41 (16, 71) 139 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Marshall County Rural No 188.5 (164.4, 215.3) 42 (7, 85) 46 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Mahaska County Rural No 187.9 (156.2, 224.4) 43 (5, 94) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.0)
Fayette County Rural No 185.7 (153.4, 223.4) 44 (5, 95) 25 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Fremont County Rural No 185.6 (136.2, 250.2) 45 (1, 99) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 0.9)
Lyon County Rural No 184.1 (143.0, 234.0) 46 (2, 98) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
Cerro Gordo County Rural No 183.9 (162.5, 207.6) 47 (13, 87) 57 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Poweshiek County Rural No 183.4 (152.2, 220.1) 48 (5, 94) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Henry County Rural No 182.7 (151.2, 219.3) 49 (5, 94) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Bremer County Urban No 181.0 (152.1, 214.2) 50 (7, 95) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 5.5)
Buchanan County Rural No 179.7 (147.3, 217.3) 51 (5, 97) 22 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Shelby County Rural No 179.6 (141.9, 225.7) 52 (4, 98) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.3)
Scott County Urban No 179.6 (167.6, 192.2) 53 (27, 76) 178 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Monona County Rural No 179.4 (135.8, 234.8) 54 (2, 99) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.3)
Tama County Rural No 179.3 (146.0, 218.8) 55 (5, 97) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Carroll County Rural No 178.7 (148.8, 213.4) 56 (8, 96) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Hancock County Rural No 178.6 (138.4, 228.3) 57 (4, 99) 14 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.6)
Osceola County Rural No 178.0 (129.0, 242.8) 58 (2, 99) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Hardin County Rural No 177.3 (145.4, 215.1) 59 (7, 97) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Howard County Rural No 175.5 (132.3, 229.7) 60 (3, 99) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.0)
O'Brien County Rural No 175.2 (139.3, 218.2) 61 (5, 98) 17 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Woodbury County Urban No 175.2 (159.3, 192.2) 62 (23, 86) 94 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -1.0)
Butler County Rural No 175.0 (140.8, 216.0) 63 (6, 98) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Louisa County Rural No 174.0 (132.3, 225.6) 64 (4, 99) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.8)
Crawford County Rural No 173.4 (138.2, 215.2) 65 (6, 99) 17 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.9)
Appanoose County Rural No 172.9 (136.9, 217.1) 66 (6, 98) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.0)
Mitchell County Rural No 172.4 (132.3, 222.2) 67 (4, 99) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Delaware County Rural No 171.7 (139.6, 209.6) 68 (8, 98) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 3.1)
Jasper County Urban No 170.7 (148.6, 195.5) 69 (18, 95) 44 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.7)
Cherokee County Rural No 169.0 (130.4, 216.5) 70 (5, 99) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Warren County Urban No 168.9 (147.9, 192.2) 71 (21, 94) 49 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Muscatine County Rural No 168.9 (146.2, 194.2) 72 (18, 95) 42 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Cedar County Rural No 168.1 (137.1, 204.7) 73 (12, 98) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Keokuk County Rural No 168.1 (127.1, 219.4) 74 (3, 99) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 0.8)
Plymouth County Rural No 167.8 (140.0, 199.7) 75 (13, 98) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Dubuque County Urban No 164.0 (149.4, 179.7) 76 (40, 92) 97 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Linn County Urban No 163.9 (154.0, 174.4) 77 (48, 88) 211 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Taylor County Rural No 163.6 (115.8, 227.9) 78 (4, 99) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 2.6)
Dickinson County Rural No 161.5 (133.6, 194.8) 79 (20, 99) 25 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Benton County Urban No 161.3 (134.8, 191.8) 80 (18, 98) 28 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.2)
Allamakee County Rural No 160.9 (126.3, 202.9) 81 (9, 99) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.6)
Worth County Rural No 157.1 (112.9, 215.2) 82 (5, 99) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.1, 0.6)
Kossuth County Rural No 156.6 (125.2, 194.7) 83 (15, 99) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Adair County Rural No 156.6 (113.9, 212.5) 84 (6, 99) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.9, 1.0)
Washington County Urban No 156.5 (128.7, 189.0) 85 (20, 99) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Jones County Urban No 156.4 (129.1, 188.3) 86 (21, 99) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Hamilton County Rural No 154.8 (123.2, 193.2) 87 (17, 99) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Sioux County Rural No 151.6 (127.7, 178.7) 88 (36, 99) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Mills County Urban No 150.7 (116.5, 192.6) 89 (17, 99) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.8, 1.8)
Buena Vista County Rural No 146.6 (116.5, 182.3) 90 (25, 99) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Humboldt County Rural No 146.2 (109.1, 193.6) 91 (16, 99) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.4)
Wright County Rural No 145.5 (112.4, 186.4) 92 (23, 99) 14 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.4)
Clay County Rural No 142.5 (113.9, 177.1) 93 (30, 99) 17 stable stable trend -4.4 (-7.5, 0.4)
Story County Urban No 141.4 (125.3, 159.0) 94 (63, 99) 58 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Winneshiek County Rural No 139.3 (113.1, 170.5) 95 (45, 99) 21 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.1, -0.1)
Dallas County Urban No 137.3 (121.9, 154.1) 96 (69, 99) 61 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.9, -2.1)
Johnson County Urban No 128.6 (116.3, 141.9) 97 (82, 99) 84 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -1.9)
Sac County Rural No 128.0 (93.9, 172.5) 98 (35, 99) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 0.6)
Jefferson County Rural Yes 120.1 (92.3, 154.6) 99 (58, 99) 14 falling falling trend -4.8 (-16.5, -1.9)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 10:28 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top